IP Library Granted Patent US 9,881,216
Granted Patent B2
US 9,881,216 · App. 15/198,848 · Granted Jan 30, 2018

Object tracking and alerts

Inventor: Christopher J. Buehler (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: Sensormatic Electronics, LLC
G06K9/00771G06K9/00718G06K9/00758G06T7/0004G08B13/1966G08B13/19602G08B13/19608G08B13/19641G08B13/19671G08B13/19691G08B13/19697G08B13/248H04N7/181H04N17/002G06K2009/00738G06T2207/30108
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,881,216
App. No.
15/198,848
Granted
Jan 30, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

An integrated surveillance system combining video surveillance and data from other sensor-based security networks is used to identify activities that may require attention.

Claims (34)

1. A system comprising:

at least one memory for storing computer-executable instructions; and

at least one processor for executing the instructions stored on the at least one memory, wherein execution of the instructions programs the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving data from a video surveillance system comprising a plurality of cameras—each having a field of view, each field of view comprising a plurality of sub-regions;

receiving data from a non-video transmitter-receiver system comprising a plurality of stations, each station configured to detect physical tags within a respective operational radius;

determining a probability that a first one of the sub-regions and a first one of the operational radii are associated;

increasing the probability that the first sub-region and the first operational radius are associated by detecting, at a plurality of different times, a simultaneous presence of a tracked object in the first sub-region and the first operational radius; and

determining that the first sub-region and the first operational radius are associated when the probability meets a threshold probability of association.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the non-video transmitter-receiver system comprises a radio-frequency identification (RFID) system, the stations comprise RFID stations, and the physical tags comprise RFID tags.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the video surveillance system is configured to capture visual representations of objects moving among the fields of view of the cameras.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the non-video transmitter-receiver system is configured to capture spatial information associated with objects moving among the operational radii of the stations.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein, in determining the association between the first sub-region and the first operational radius, at least one of the following is unknown: (i) a location of the camera having the field of view comprising the first sub-region, and (ii) a location of the station associated with the first operational radius.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise chronologically representing physical locations of tracked objects based on data received from the video surveillance system and the non-video transmitter-receiver system.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise creating an alert upon identifying a violation of a rule by one or more of the chronological representations of the physical locations of one or more of the tracked objects.

8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the video surveillance system and the non-video transmitter-receiver system operate within a region, the region comprising at least one ineffective area outside the fields of view of the cameras and the operational radii of the stations.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise inferring a location of the tracked object as the tracked object passes through at least one ineffective area.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise inferring a next camera location for the tracked object as the tracked object passes through an ineffective area, the next camera location being inferred based on a previously known location of the tracked object.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein the video surveillance system and the non-video transmitter-receiver system are calibrated independently of each other.

12. A method implemented using one or more computers each comprising at least one memory storing computer-executable instructions and at least one processor for executing the instructions, the method comprising:

receiving data from a video surveillance system comprising a plurality of cameras each having a field of view, each field of view comprising a plurality of sub-regions;

receiving data from a non-video transmitter-receiver system comprising a plurality of stations, each station configured to detect physical tags within a respective operational radius;

determining a probability that a first one of the sub-regions and a first one of the operational radii are associated;

increasing the probability that the first sub-region and the first operational radius are associated by detecting, at a plurality of different times, a simultaneous presence of a tracked object in the first sub-region and the first operational radius; and

determining that the first sub-region and the first operational radius are associated when the probability meets a threshold probability of association.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the non-video transmitter-receiver system comprises a radio-frequency identification (RFID) system, the stations comprise RFID stations, and the physical tags comprise RFID tags.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the video surveillance system is configured to capture visual representations of objects moving among the fields of view of the cameras.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the non-video transmitter-receiver system is configured to capture spatial information associated with objects moving among the operational radii of the stations.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein, in determining the association between the first sub-region and the first operational radius, at least one of the following is unknown: (i) a location of the camera having the field of view comprising the first sub-region, and (ii) a location of the station associated with the first operational radius.

17. The method of claim 12 , further comprising chronologically representing physical locations of tracked objects based on data received from the video surveillance system and the non-video transmitter-receiver system.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising creating an alert upon identifying a violation of a rule by one or more of the chronological representations of the physical locations of one or more of the tracked objects.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the video surveillance system and the non-video transmitter-receiver system operate within a region, the region comprising at least one ineffective area outside the fields of view of the cameras and the operational radii of the stations.

20. The method of claim 19 , further comprising inferring a location of the tracked object as the tracked object passes through at least one ineffective area.

21. The method of claim 19 , further comprising inferring a next camera location for the tracked object as the tracked object passes through an ineffective area, the next camera location being inferred based on a previously known location of the tracked object.

22. The method of claim 12 , wherein the video surveillance system and the non-video transmitter-receiver system are calibrated independently of each other.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 23, 2024
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
To: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 068494/0384 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2022
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS US HOLDINGS LLC
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
Reel/Frame 058955/0394 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2022
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 058955/0472 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2022
From: SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS, LLC
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS US HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 058957/0138 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 30, 2021
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS US HOLDINGS LLC
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
Reel/Frame 058600/0080 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 30, 2021
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS INC
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 058600/0126 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 30, 2021
From: SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS LLC
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS US HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 058600/0001 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 14687358 · Apr 15, 2015
Continuation 11443500 · May 30, 2006
Provisional Application 60713679 · Sep 2, 2005
Provisional Application 60714020 · Sep 2, 2005
Related Publication 20170053171A1 · Feb 23, 2017