Methods for using organizational behavior for risk ratings
Among other things, traces are received of activities of an online user who is associated with an entity. By analysis of the traces a security state of the entity is inferred. Also, a map is generated between (a) technical assets that contribute to security characteristics of respective entities and (b) the identities of the entities that are associated with the respective technical assets. At least part of the generating of the map is done automatically. A user can be engaged to assist in the generating of the map by presenting to the user through a user interface (a) data about the technical assets of entities and (b) an interactive tool for associating the technical assets with the identities of the entities.
1. A method comprising:
receiving traces of activities of a plurality of online users who are associated with an entity, wherein the traces of the online users' activities are received from a plurality of disassociated sources including a shared service servicing multiple entities, the traces comprising indications of security characteristics with respect to electronic signals associated with the online users; and
inferring, by analysis of the traces of the online users' activities and the use of a shared service, a security rating for the entity, wherein at least one trace originated in a context controlled by the entity and at least one trace originated in a context not controlled by the entity,
wherein the analysis comprises a comparison of traces that originated in different contexts of online activities of a user of the plurality of online users,
wherein the different contexts comprise different times,
wherein the traces that originated at one of the times reflect a user deletion relative to the traces that originated at an earlier time, and
wherein the traces that originated at one of the times reflect a user deletion of malicious data or code relative to the traces at the earlier time.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the traces indicate successful attacks on computer systems of the entity.
3. The method of claim 1 comprising distinguishing between traces that represent a less satisfactory security state of the entity and traces that represent a more satisfactory security state of the entity.
4. The method of claim 1 in which the different contexts comprise a context the security of which is controlled by the entity and a context the security of which is at least partly uncontrolled by the entity.
5. The method of claim 4 in which the controlled context comprises a computer system or device made accessible by the entity to the user, and the partly uncontrolled context comprises a computer system or device owned by the user.
6. The method of claim 1 in which the traces comprise tracking of an identity of the online user between two of the different contexts.
7. The method of claim 6 in which the tracking comprises cookies associated with advertising directed to the online user.
8. The method of claim 1 in which the security characteristics comprise indications of whether email messages conform to DomainKeys Identified Mail standards or email domains conform to Sender Policy Framework.
9. The method of claim 1 in which the traces of activities comprise logs of online activities of employees of the entity.
10. The method of claim 1 in which the traces of activities comprise information associated with a user device that represents online activities.
11. The method of claim 10 in which the information associated with the user device comprises information about one or more cookies stored in a memory of the user device.
12. The method of claim 1 in which the traces of activities comprise information about social media activities.
13. The method of claim 1 in which the traces of activities comprise information about email communications.
14. The method of claim 1 in which the traces of activities comprise information about content presented to the online users.
15. The method of claim 1 in which the traces of activities comprise information about receipt by a user of the plurality of online users of malicious mail and the compromise of a domain identified as an origin of the malicious mail.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein an entity comprises an individual or business that has electronic data and that communicates electronically with other individuals and businesses.