IP Library Granted Patent US 10,147,419
Granted Patent B2
US 10,147,419 · App. 15/251,868 · Granted Dec 4, 2018

Automated recognition system for natural language understanding

Inventors: Yoryos Yeracaris (Boston, MA); Larissa Lapshina (Shirley, MA); Alwin B. Carus (Waban, MA)
Assignee: INTERACTIONS LLC
G10L15/063H04M3/4936G10L15/1822G10L2015/0635G10L2015/0638H04M3/5166
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,147,419
App. No.
15/251,868
Granted
Dec 4, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

An interactive response system directs input to a software-based router, which is able to intelligently respond to the input by drawing on a combination of human agents, advanced recognition and expert systems. The system utilizes human “intent analysts” for purposes of interpreting customer input. Automated recognition subsystems are trained by coupling customer input with IA-selected intent corresponding to the input, using model-updating subsystems to develop the training information for the automated recognition subsystems.

Claims (38)

1. A system for processing an interaction with a person, comprising:

a routing processor configured to receive data representing an input provided by the person;

an analyst user interface device in communication with the routing processor, configured to present to at least one human analyst information related to the input in perceptible form and to accept an intent from the at least one human analyst; and

a training subsystem configured to:

determine a level of end-user traffic;

based on the level of end-user traffic, determine a number of human intent analysts to assign to interpret user input;

receive the information and the intent;

select a target vocabulary based on a business meaning corresponding to the input as determined by at least one of the human intent analysts;

train a first model used by a training ASR and generated based at least in part on the information and the intent and using the target vocabulary to interpret the input, the training ASR configured to generate statistics responsive to the information; and

train a second model used by the real-time ASR responsive to the statistics.

2. The system of claim 1 , the system further comprising a real-time automated speech recognizer (ASR) in communication with the routing processor and configured to receive therefore the data, wherein the training subsystem is configured to train the real-time ASR by updating the second model.

3. The system of claim 1 , the system further comprising a real-time automated speech recognizer (ASR) in communication with the routing processor and configured to receive therefore the data, wherein the training subsystem is configured to continue training the real-time ASR responsive to the real-time ASR not reaching a performance threshold.

4. A computer-implemented method for operating an interactive response system comprising:

determining a level of end-user traffic;

based on the level of end-user traffic, determining a number of intent analysts to assign to interpret user input

receiving data representing an input from a person;

using a processor, automatically presenting information relating to the input to at least one of the intent analysts through an analyst user interface;

accepting an intent from the at least one intent analyst through the analyst user interface;

providing the information and the intent to a training subsystem;

accepting from the training subsystem a target vocabulary selected based on a business meaning corresponding to the input as determined by the at least one intent analyst;

accepting from the training subsystem a training model used by a training automated speech recognizer (ASR), the training ASR generated responsive to the information and the intent and using the target vocabulary to interpret the input;

accepting from the training ASR statistics generated responsive to the information; and

training, via the statistics, a second model used by a real-time ASR in order to improve performance thereof.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the training comprises updating the second model.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the training comprises testing performance of the real-time ASR and continuing training responsive to the performance not exceeding a performance threshold.

7. A system for managing interactions with a person, comprising non-transitory computer storage media storing programming instructions executable by at least one processor for:

determining a level of end-user traffic;

based on the level of end-user traffic, determining a number of intent analysts to assign to interpret user input

receiving data representing an input from a person;

using a processor, automatically presenting information relating to the input to at least one of the intent analysts through an analyst user interface;

accepting an intent from the at least one intent analyst through the analyst user interface;

providing the information and the intent to a training subsystem;

accepting from the training subsystem a target vocabulary based on a business meaning corresponding to the input as determined by the at least one intent analyst;

accepting from the training subsystem a training model used by a training automated speech recognizer (ASR), the training ASR generated responsive to the information and the intent and using the target vocabulary to interpret the input;

accepting from the training ASR statistics generated responsive to the information; and

training, via the statistics, a second model used by a real-time ASR in order to improve performance thereof.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the training comprises updating the second model.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the training comprises testing performance of the real-time ASR and continuing training responsive to the performance not exceeding a performance threshold.

Assignments (11)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2025
From: RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP., AS AGENT
To: INTERACTIONS CORPORATION; INTERACTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 072802/0931 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE APPLICATION NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 060445 FRAME: 0733. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 1, 2023
From: INTERACTIONS LLC; INTERACTIONS CORPORATION
To: RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Reel/Frame 062919/0063 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME: 049387/0687 Recorded Jun 30, 2022
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: INTERACTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 060557/0919 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME: 049388/0082 Recorded Jun 30, 2022
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: INTERACTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 060558/0474 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME: 043039/0808 Recorded Jun 30, 2022
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: INTERACTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 060557/0636 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 27, 2022
From: INTERACTIONS LLC; INTERACTIONS CORPORATION
To: RUNWAY GROWTH FINANCE CORP.
Reel/Frame 060445/0733 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 5, 2019
From: INTERACTIONS CORPORATION
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 049387/0687 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 5, 2019
From: INTERACTIONS LLC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 049388/0082 →
AMENDED AND RESTATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 29, 2017
From: INTERACTIONS LLC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 043039/0808 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: INTERACTIONS CORPORATION
To: INTERACTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 039998/0458 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: YERACARIS, YORYOS; LAPSHINA, LARISSA; CARUS, ALWIN B
To: INTERACTIONS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 039999/0753 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 14050658 · Oct 10, 2013
Continuation In Part 12985174 · Jan 5, 2011
Related Publication 20160372109A1 · Dec 22, 2016
Cited By (1)
US 12,380,877