IP Library Granted Patent US 10,640,111
Granted Patent B1
US 10,640,111 · App. 15/258,324 · Granted May 5, 2020

Speed planning for autonomous vehicles

Inventors: Jens-Steffen Ralf Gutmann (Cupertino, CA); Vadim Furman (Los Gatos, CA); Tobias Kunz (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Waymo LLC
B60W30/143
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,640,111
App. No.
15/258,324
Granted
May 5, 2020
Kind
B1
Abstract

Aspects of the disclosure relate to identifying and adjusting speed plans for controlling a vehicle in an autonomous driving mode. In one example, an initial speed plan for controlling speed of the vehicle for a first predetermined period of time corresponding to an amount of time along a route of the vehicle is identified. Data identifying an object and characteristics of that object is received from a perception system of the vehicle. A trajectory for the object that will intersect with the route at an intersection point at particular point in time is predicted using the data. A set of constraints is generated based on at least the trajectory. The speed plan is adjusted in order to satisfy the set of constraints for a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time. The vehicle is maneuvered in the autonomous driving mode according to the adjusted speed plan.

Claims (57)

1. A method of maneuvering a vehicle in an autonomous driving mode, the method comprising:

identifying, by one or more processors, an initial speed plan for controlling speed of the vehicle for a first predetermined period of time corresponding to an amount of time along a route of the vehicle, the initial speed plan corresponding to a selected speed of the vehicle defined at least in part by a legal speed limit on the speed of the vehicle for a roadway on which the vehicle is currently located;

receiving, by the one or more processors, from a perception system of the vehicle, data identifying an object and characteristics of that object;

predicting, by the one or more processors, a trajectory for the object that will intersect with the route at an intersection point at a particular point in time using the data;

generating, by the one or more processors, a set of constraints including a first constraint based on at least the trajectory and a second constraint based on expected comfort of at least one of a passenger within the vehicle or a person associated with the object;

determining whether the first and second constraints can both be satisfied during a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time;

upon determining that both of the first and second constraints can be satisfied;

adjusting, by the one or more processors, the initial speed plan in order to satisfy the first and second constraints for a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time;

maneuvering, by the one or more processors, the vehicle in the autonomous driving mode according to the adjusted initial speed plan; and

upon determining that the first and second constraints cannot both be satisfied:

comparing an expected result if the vehicle were to return to the selected speed with an expected result if the vehicle were to come to a complete stop.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initial speed plan corresponds to a previously adjusted initial speed plan such that the initial speed plan is adjusted as an iterative process.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a constraint of the set of constraints includes constraint that the vehicle should not be within a predetermined distance of the intersection point at the particular point in time.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a status of a traffic signal, and wherein generating a constraint of the set of constraints is based on the determined status.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving from the perception system of the vehicle, second data identifying a second object and characteristics of the second object including a speed of the second object, wherein the second object corresponds to a road user;

predicting a second trajectory of the second object that indicates that the vehicle will pass the second object; and

wherein the set of constraints includes a constraint that limits the speed of the vehicle relative to the speed of the second object when the vehicle passes the second object.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving from the perception system of the vehicle, second data identifying a second object and characteristics of the second object including a signal of the second object, wherein the second object corresponds to a road user, and wherein generating the set of constraints includes generating a first constraint of the set of constraints based on the signal of the second object.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising, adjusting the adjusted initial speed plan to generate a speed plan based on the first constraint where the signal does not persist while the speed plan is being generated, and wherein the signal is a hand signal and the second object is a bicyclist.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a constraint of the set of constraints is selected from a group consisting of:

a constraint that includes a deceleration limit corresponding to a mechanical limit of deceleration for the vehicle;

a constraint that includes a deceleration limit for the vehicle corresponding to a level of deceleration less than a recommended deceleration level to safely operate the vehicle;

a constraint that includes a headway distance limit between the vehicle and the object corresponding to a distance greater than a recommended headway distance to safely operate the vehicle; and

a constraint that includes a lateral gap distance limit between the vehicle and the object corresponding to a lateral gap distance greater than a recommended lateral gap distance to safely operate the vehicle.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the speed of the vehicle remains constant during the initial speed plan.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the second constraint based on the expected comfort includes determining an expected jerk value associated with the vehicle during the second period of time.

11. A system for maneuvering a vehicle in autonomous driving mode, the system comprising one or more processors configured to:

identify an initial speed plan for controlling speed of the vehicle for a first predetermined period of time corresponding to an amount of time along a route of the vehicle, the initial speed plan corresponding to a selected speed of the vehicle defined at least in part by a legal speed limit on the speed of the vehicle for a roadway on which the vehicle is currently located;

receive from a perception system of the vehicle, data identifying an object and characteristics of that object;

predict a trajectory for the object that will intersect with the route at an intersection point at a particular point in time using the data;

generate a set of constraints including a first constraint based on at least the trajectory and a second constraint based on expected comfort of at least one of a passenger within the vehicle or a person associated with the object;

determine whether the first and second constraints can both be satisfied during a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time;

upon determining that both of the first and second constraints can be satisfied;

adjust the initial speed plan in order to satisfy the set of constraints for a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time;

maneuvering the vehicle in the autonomous driving mode according to the adjusted initial speed plan; and

upon determining that the first and second constraints cannot both be satisfied:

compare an expected result if the vehicle were to return to the selected speed with an expected result if the vehicle were to come to a complete stop.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the initial speed plan corresponds to a previously adjusted initial speed plan such that the initial speed plan is adjusted as an iterative process.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein a constraint of the set of constraints is selected from a group consisting of:

a constraint that includes constraint that the vehicle should not be within a predetermined distance of the intersection point at the particular point in time;

a constraint that includes a deceleration limit for the vehicle corresponding to a level of deceleration less than a recommended deceleration level to safely operate the vehicle;

a constraint that includes a headway distance limit between the vehicle and the object corresponding to a distance greater than a recommended headway distance to safely operate the vehicle; and

a constraint that includes a lateral gap distance limit between the vehicle and the object corresponding to a lateral gap distance greater than a recommend lateral gap distance to safely operate the vehicle.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to determine a status of a traffic signal, and generating a constraint of the set of constraints is based on the status.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the speed of the vehicle remains constant during the initial speed plan.

16. A non-transitory computer readable medium on which instructions are stored, the instructions when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform a method of controlling a vehicle in an autonomous driving mode, the method comprising:

identifying an initial speed plan for controlling speed of the vehicle for a first predetermined period of time corresponding to an amount of time along a route of the vehicle, the initial speed plan corresponding to a selected speed of the vehicle defined at least in part by a legal speed limit on the speed of the vehicle for a roadway on which the vehicle is currently located;

receiving from a perception system of the vehicle, data identifying an object and characteristics of that object;

determining whether the first and second constraints can both be satisfied during a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time;

upon determining that both of the first and second constraints can be satisfied;

predicting a trajectory for the object that will intersect with the route at an intersection point at a particular point in time using the data;

generating a set of constraints including a first constraint based on at least the trajectory and a second constraint based on expected comfort of at least one of a passenger within the vehicle or a person associated with the object;

adjusting the initial speed plan in order to satisfy the set of constraints for a second predetermined period of time corresponding to the amount of time;

maneuvering the vehicle according to the adjusted initial speed plan; and

upon determining that the first and second constraints cannot both be satisfied:

comparing an expected result if the vehicle were to return to the selected speed with an expected result if the vehicle were to come to a complete stop.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2017
From: WAYMO HOLDING INC.
To: WAYMO LLC
Reel/Frame 042108/0021 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 27, 2017
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: WAYMO HOLDING INC.
Reel/Frame 042099/0935 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2016
From: GUTMANN, JENS-STEFFEN RALF; FURMAN, VADIM; KUNZ, TOBIAS
To: GOOGLE INC.
Reel/Frame 039676/0001 →
Cited By (1)
US 12,189,349