IP Library Granted Patent US 10,272,264
Granted Patent B2
US 10,272,264 · App. 15/269,870 · Granted Apr 30, 2019

Generating time-efficient treatment field trajectories for external-beam radiation treatments

Inventors: Santtu Ollila (Helsinki, FI); Mikko Vainio (Espoo, FI); Jarkko Peltola (Tuusula, FI); Janne Nord (Espoo, FI); Esa Kuusela (Espoo, FI); Juha Kauppinen (Espoo, FI); Viljo Petäjä (Espoo, FI); Marko Rusanen (Espoo, FI)
Assignee: Varian Medical Systems International AG
A61N5/1042A61N5/1031A61N5/1039A61N5/1045A61N5/1047
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,272,264
App. No.
15/269,870
Granted
Apr 30, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a radiation treatment plan that includes a plurality of treatment fields of multiple treatment modalities, such as IMRT modality and dynamic treatment path modality (e.g., VMAT and conformal arc therapy), an optimized spatial point sequence may be determined that optimizes the total treatment time, which includes both the beam-on time (i.e., during the delivery of radiation dose) and the beam-off time (i.e., during transitions between consecutive treatment fields). The result is a time-ordered field trajectory that intermixes and interleaves different treatment fields. In one embodiment, a dynamic treatment path may be cut into a plurality of sections, and one or more IMRT fields may be inserted between the plurality of sections.

Claims (93)

1. A computer-implemented method of determining a treatment field trajectory for delivering a desired dose of radiation to a treatment target within a patient using an external-beam radiation treatment system, the method comprising:

receiving a radiation treatment plan having a first treatment field of an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) modality and a second treatment field of a dynamic treatment path modality, the first treatment field having a first spatial point associated with a first set of values for treatment axes of the radiation treatment system, and the second treatment field defining a treatment path having a start spatial point associated with a start set of values for the treatment axes and an end spatial point associated with an end set of values for the treatment axes;

identifying, using a computer system, a plurality of intermediate spatial points along the treatment path of the second treatment field, each intermediate spatial point dividing the treatment path into a first section and a second section, and each intermediate spatial point associated with a respective intermediate set of values for the treatment axes;

for each of the plurality of intermediate spatial points:

determining, using the computer system, a transition time for changing the treatment axes from the respective intermediate set of values to the first set of values of the first spatial point and changing from the first set of values back to the respective intermediate set of values;

selecting, using the computer system, an optimal intermediate spatial point among the plurality of intermediate spatial points to achieve an optimal total treatment time, the optimal total treatment time including the transition time and beam-on time for administering the first treatment field and the second treatment field;

determining the treatment field trajectory by interleaving the first treatment field between the first section and the second section of the second treatment field; and

updating the radiation treatment plan using the determined treatment field trajectory, wherein the radiation treatment plan is to be used by the external-beam radiation treatment system for delivering the desired dose of radiation.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising transmitting the updated radiation treatment plan to control circuitry of the radiation treatment system to cause the radiation treatment system to deliver the desired dose of radiation to the patient in a chronological order in accordance with the determined treatment field trajectory.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first spatial point of the first treatment field is not on the treatment path of the second treatment field.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the start spatial point;

administering the first section of the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point; and

administering the second section of the second treatment field from the optimal intermediate spatial point to the end spatial point.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein:

the optimal intermediate spatial point corresponds to a first intermediate control point and a second intermediate control point;

administering the first section of the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the optimal intermediate spatial point comprises administering the first section of the second treatment field from a start control point corresponding to the start spatial point to the first intermediate control point; and

administering the second section of the second treatment field from the optimal intermediate spatial point to the end spatial point comprises administering the second section of the second treatment field from the second intermediate control point to an end control point corresponding to the end spatial point.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the start spatial point; and

administering the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the end spatial point.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the start spatial point;

administering the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the end spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point; and

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the end spatial point;

administering the second section of the second treatment field from the end spatial point to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point; and

administering the first section of the second treatment field from the optimal intermediate spatial point to the start spatial point.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the radiation treatment plan further includes a third treatment field of either the IMRT modality or the dynamic treatment path modality, and determining the treatment field trajectory further comprises:

determining an optimal chronological order of administering the first treatment field, the first section and the second section of the second treatment field, and the third treatment field to achieve the optimal total treatment time.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dynamic treatment path modality comprises volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the IMRT modality comprises a static IMRT modality where leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) do not move while radiation dose is being delivered.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the IMRT modality comprises a dynamic IMRT modality where leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) move while radiation dose is being delivered.

13. A computer product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a plurality of instructions that when executed control a computer system to determine a treatment field trajectory for delivering a desired dose of radiation to a treatment target within a patient using an external-beam radiation treatment system, the instructions comprising:

receiving a radiation treatment plan having a first treatment field of an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) modality and a second treatment field of a dynamic treatment path modality, the first treatment field having a first spatial point associated with a first set of values for treatment axes of the radiation treatment system, and the second treatment field defining a treatment path having a start spatial point associated with a start set of values for the treatment axes and an end spatial point associated with an end set of values for the treatment axes;

identifying, using the computer system, a plurality of intermediate spatial points along the treatment path of the second treatment field, each intermediate spatial point dividing the treatment path into a first section and a second section, and each intermediate spatial point associated with a respective intermediate set of values for the treatment axes;

for each of the plurality of intermediate spatial points:

determining, using the computer system, a transition time for changing the treatment axes from the respective intermediate set of values to the first set of values of the first spatial point and changing from the first set of values back to the respective intermediate set of values;

selecting, using the computer system, an optimal intermediate spatial point among the plurality of intermediate spatial points to achieve an optimal total treatment time, the optimal total treatment time including the transition time and beam-on time for administering the first treatment field and the second treatment field;

determining the treatment field trajectory by interleaving the first treatment field between the first section and the second section of the second treatment field; and

updating the radiation treatment plan using the determined treatment field trajectory, wherein the radiation treatment plan is to be used by the external-beam radiation treatment system for delivering the desired dose of radiation.

14. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein the instructions further comprise:

transmitting the updated radiation treatment plan to control circuitry of the radiation treatment system to cause the radiation treatment system to deliver the desired dose of radiation to the patient in a chronological order in accordance with the determined treatment field trajectory.

15. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein the first spatial point of the first treatment field is not on the treatment path of the second treatment field.

16. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the start spatial point;

administering the first section of the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point; and

administering the second section of the second treatment field from the optimal intermediate spatial point to the end spatial point.

17. The computer product of claim 16 , wherein:

the optimal intermediate spatial point corresponds to a first intermediate control point and a second intermediate control point;

administering the first section of the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the optimal intermediate spatial point comprises administering the first section of the second treatment field from a start control point corresponding to the start spatial point to the first intermediate control point; and

administering the second section of the second treatment field from the optimal intermediate spatial point to the end spatial point comprises administering the second section of the second treatment field from the second intermediate control point to an end control point corresponding to the end spatial point.

18. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the start spatial point; and

administering the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the end spatial point.

19. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the start spatial point;

administering the second treatment field from the start spatial point to the end spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point; and

moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point.

20. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein delivering the desired dose of radiation includes:

moving the treatment axes to the end spatial point;

administering the second section of the second treatment field from the end spatial point to the optimal intermediate spatial point;

moving the treatment axes to the first spatial point;

administering the first treatment field at the first spatial point; moving the treatment axes to the optimal intermediate spatial point; and

administering the first section of the second treatment field from the optimal intermediate spatial point to the start spatial point.

21. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein the radiation treatment plan further includes a third treatment field of either the IMRT modality or the dynamic treatment path modality, and determining the treatment field trajectory further comprises:

determining an optimal chronological order of administering the first treatment field, the first section and the second section of the second treatment field, and the third treatment field to achieve the optimal total treatment time.

22. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein the dynamic treatment path modality comprises volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).

23. The computer product of claim 13 , wherein the IMRT modality comprises a static IMRT modality where leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) do not move while radiation dose is being delivered, or a dynamic IMRT modality where leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) move while radiation dose is being delivered.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 25, 2024
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 066369/0779 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SECOND INVENTOR LAST NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 040966 FRAME: 0969. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jan 26, 2017
From: OLLILA, SANTTU; VAINIO, MIKKO; PELTOLA, JARKKO; NORD, JANNE; KUUSELA, ESA; KAUPPINEN, JUHA; PETÄJÄ, VILJO; RUSANEN, MARKO
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 041511/0454 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 12, 2017
From: OLLILA, SANTTU; MIKKO, MIKKO; PELTOLA, JARKKO; NORD, JANNE; KUUSELA, ESA; KAUPPINEN, JUHA; PETÄJÄ, VILJO; RUSANEN, MARKO
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 040966/0969 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180078789A1 · Mar 22, 2018
Cited By (5)
US 12,239,850 US 12,290,704 US 12,311,198 US 12,390,662 US 12,646,596