IP Library Granted Patent US 10,252,400
Granted Patent B1
US 10,252,400 · App. 15/277,891 · Granted Apr 9, 2019

Methods for improving jet cutting performance via force sensing

Inventors: Charles D. Burnham (Southbury, CT); Mohamed A. Hashish (Bellevue, WA)
Assignee: Flow International Corporation
B24C7/0015B24C3/32B24C7/0023B24C7/0061
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,252,400
App. No.
15/277,891
Granted
Apr 9, 2019
Kind
B1
Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for improving the performance of a fluid jet cutting system by testing and adjusting characteristics of the system based on the effect of the characteristics on forces imparted by the system to a workpiece being cut. Also disclosed are systems and methods for monitoring and validating the performance of fluid jet cutting systems, and for diagnosing such systems. In some cases, the technologies described herein can be used to determine whether components of a fluid jet system require maintenance, or that characteristics of the system require adjustment.

Claims (34)

1. A method of improving fluid jet performance, the method comprising:

selecting a first setting for a characteristic of a fluid jet system;

forming a first cut in a coupon of material using the fluid jet system having the first setting for the characteristic;

while forming the first cut in the coupon, measuring a first history of reactive forces imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon during at least a portion of the first cut;

selecting a second setting for the characteristic of the fluid jet system;

forming a second cut in the coupon using the fluid jet system having the second setting for the characteristic;

while forming the second cut in the coupon, measuring a second history of reactive forces imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon during at least a portion of the second cut;

designating the first setting as an optimal setting if an average or typical value of the first history of reactive forces is lower than an average or typical value of the second history of reactive forces and a quality criterion of the first cut is acceptable; and

designating the second setting as an optimal setting if the average or typical value of the second history of reactive forces is lower than the average or typical value of the first history of reactive forces and a quality criterion of the second cut is acceptable.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a translation speed of a cutting head of the fluid jet system.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a size of a fluid jet orifice of the fluid jet system which generates a fluid jet during operation to perform the first and second cuts.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a fluid pressure developed within the fluid jet system immediately upstream of an orifice that generates a fluid jet during operation to perform the first and second cuts.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a type of an abrasive introduced into a fluid jet generated by the fluid jet system during operation to perform the first and second cuts.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a mesh size of an abrasive introduced into a fluid jet generated by the fluid jet system during operation to perform the first and second cuts.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a flow rate of an abrasive introduced into a fluid jet generated by the fluid jet system during operation to perform the first and second cuts.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a size of a mixing tube of the fluid jet system from which a fluid jet is discharged during operation to perform the first and second cuts.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic is a first characteristic, the optimal setting is a first optimal setting, and the method further comprises:

selecting a first setting for a second characteristic of the fluid jet system;

forming a first supplemental cut in the coupon using the fluid jet system having the first setting for the second characteristic;

while forming the first supplemental cut in the coupon, measuring a first supplemental history of reactive forces imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon during at least a portion of the first supplemental cut;

selecting a second setting for the second characteristic of the fluid jet system;

forming a second supplemental cut in the coupon using the fluid jet system having the second setting for the second characteristic;

while forming the second supplemental cut in the coupon, measuring a second supplemental history of reactive forces imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon during at least a portion of the second supplemental cut;

designating the first setting for the second characteristic as a second optimal setting if an average or typical value of the first supplemental history of reactive forces is lower than an average or typical value of the second supplemental history of reactive forces and a quality of the first supplemental cut is acceptable; and

designating the second setting for the second characteristic as a second optimal setting if the average or typical value of the second supplemental history of reactive forces is lower than the average or typical value of the first supplemental history of reactive forces and a quality of the second supplemental cut is acceptable.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein:

the first characteristic includes one of: a translation speed of a cutting head of the fluid jet system; a size of a fluid jet orifice of the fluid jet system which generates a fluid jet; a fluid pressure developed within the fluid jet system immediately upstream of the fluid jet orifice; a type of an abrasive introduced into the fluid jet; a mesh size of an abrasive introduced into the fluid jet; a flow rate of an abrasive introduced into the fluid jet; and a size of a mixing tube of the fluid jet system from which the fluid jet is discharged; and

the second characteristic includes another of: the translation speed of the cutting head of the fluid jet system; the size of the fluid jet orifice of the fluid jet system which generates the fluid jet; the fluid pressure developed within the fluid jet system immediately upstream of the fluid jet orifice; the type of an abrasive introduced into the fluid jet; the mesh size of an abrasive introduced into the fluid jet; the flow rate of an abrasive introduced into the fluid jet; and the size of the mixing tube of the fluid jet system from which the fluid jet is discharged.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first supplemental history of reactive forces is a history of net force imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first supplemental history of reactive forces is a history of a horizontal component of a net force imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the first supplemental history of reactive forces is a history of a vertical component of a net force imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first history of reactive forces is a history of net force imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first history of reactive forces is a history of a horizontal component of a net force imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first history of reactive forces is a history of a vertical component of a net force imparted by the fluid jet system to the coupon.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2024
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.; FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; H2O JET, INC.; KMT WATERJET SYSTEMS, INC.; DYNAMIC ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; KMT AQUA-DYNE, INC.
Reel/Frame 068980/0809 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2024
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
To: SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.; FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; H2O JET, INC.; KMT WATERJET SYSTEMS, INC.; DYNAMIC ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; KMT AQUA-DYNE, INC.
Reel/Frame 068980/0831 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 10, 2024
From: SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.,; FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; DYNAMIC ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; H2O JET, INC.; KMT WATERJET SYSTEMS, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 068922/0390 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 6, 2024
From: FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
To: ATLANTIC PARK STRATEGIC CAPITAL FUND II, L.P., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 068882/0219 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2018
From: ALLY BANK
To: KMT ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; H2O JET, INC.; FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 047829/0140 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2018
From: FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.; H2O JET, INC.; KMT WATERJET SYSTEMS, INC.; DYNAMIC ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; KMT AQUA-DYNE, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE, AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 046438/0130 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2018
From: FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.; H2O JET, INC.; KMT WATERJET SYSTEMS, INC.; DYNAMIC ROBOTIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; KMT AQUA-DYNE, INC.
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 046438/0157 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 28, 2017
From: SHAPE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.; FLOW INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; KMT WATERJET SYSTEMS, INC.
To: ALLY BANK, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 044514/0559 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 62234499 · Sep 29, 2015
Cited By (1)
US 12,240,080