Inserter sealer system
An optimized system and method for application of liquid for moistening adhesive on envelope flaps as part of an automated mail production process. Envelopes with open envelope flaps are transported beneath a moistening brush so that an interior side of the flaps, having adhesive thereon, come into contact with a lower end of the moistening brush. A flow of liquid is provided from a liquid supply coupled to the moistening brush to keep the moistening brush wet as moisture is transferred to the envelope flaps. The rate at which liquid is regulated such that moisture is maintained on the brush and a selected quantity of liquid (a dose) is provided for each envelope flap that it moistened. The dose is automatically determined as a function of physical dimensions of the envelope flap, and to optimize sealing of the envelope without excess dripping.
1. A method for optimized application of liquid for moistening adhesive on envelope flaps as part of an automated mail production process; the method comprising:
transporting open envelope flaps beneath a moistening brush so that an interior side of the flaps, having adhesive thereon, come into contact with a lower end of the moistening brush, thereby transferring moisture from the moistening brush to the interior side of the flaps;
providing a flow of liquid from a liquid supply coupled to the moistening brush to keep the moistening brush wet as moisture is transferred to the envelope flaps;
regulating a rate at which liquid is supplied to the moistening brush with a controlled pump included in the liquid supply, a flow of liquid to the brush regulated such that moisture is maintained on the brush and a selected quantity of liquid (a dose) is provided for each envelope flap that it moistened, and wherein the dose is automatically determined as a function of physical dimensions of the envelope flap, and the dose is adequate for sealing the envelopes, but less than an amount where the brush would drip; performing an auto-priming operation after a predetermined idle time in which liquid has not been supplied to the brush; and wherein the auto priming operation comprises causing the controlled pump to supply liquid to the brush so that the brush is fully saturated with liquid and then causing the system to moisten a series of waste envelopes to remove any excess liquid prior to resuming normal operation.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step determining the dose is based on the physical dimensions corresponding to height, width, and slope of the envelope flap.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of determining the dose is further based on a general formula that is determined by a least squares analysis that, determines parameter values for the formula to correspond to measured data for optimal dosages for a variety of different envelope types having different flap dimensions.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the parameter values are further determined in the least squares analysis by minimizing a difference between the measured data for optimal dosage for the different envelope types and calculated values using the general formula with the parameter values.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the auto-priming operation further comprises: wherein the number waste envelopes to be run is numerator five divided by the dose, where the dose is expressed as a fraction of a cycle of the controlled pump.
6. The method of claim 1 further including:
storing liquid in a tank having a tank outlet for supplying liquid for moistening;
filtering liquid from the tank with a filter coupled to the outlet of the tank for removing impurities in the liquid from the tank, the filter having a filter inlet and a filter outlet;
sensing pressure with a pressure sensor having sensor ports coupled at both the filter inlet and filter outlet, the pressure sensor in operative communication with a controller;
sensing liquid flow with a flow sensor in operative communication with the controller, positioned downstream of the pressure sensor, and through which liquid passes on its way to the brush.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein a signal from the pressure sensor port at the filter inlet is scaled and processed in the controller to correspond to a liquid level in the tank, and providing a “liquid level low” error signal when a pressure at the filter inlet goes below a predetermined threshold.
8. The method of claim 6 including measuring a differential pressure across the filter inlet and filter outlet with pressure sensor, and providing a “fitter clogged” error signal when the differential pressure goes above a predetermined threshold the tank, and providing a “liquid level low” error signal when a pressure at the filter inlet goes below a predetermined threshold.