IP Library Granted Patent US 9,978,257
Granted Patent B1
US 9,978,257 · App. 15/348,444 · Granted May 22, 2018

Alarm signaling technology

Inventors: Stephen Scott Trundle (Falls Church, VA); Alison Jane Slavin (Vienna, VA); Jean-Paul Martin (Oakton, VA)
Assignee: Alarm.com Incorporated
G08B29/046G08B29/185
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,978,257
App. No.
15/348,444
Granted
May 22, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Techniques are described for handling an event where a control panel or an alarm signaling device is tampered with or destroyed by a disablement tactic, e.g., a “crash and smash intrusion”.

Claims (30)

1. A server comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable storage medium coupled to the at least one processor having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving alarm system data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations;

aggregating the received alarm system data in geographic regions to enable detection of patterns of events in the geographic regions;

analyzing the aggregated data to identify a regionalized pattern of events associated with a particular geographic region; and

based on the identification of the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region, taking action for alarm systems in the particular geographic region.

2. The server of claim 1 , wherein receiving alarm system data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations comprises receiving alarm system data related to alarm system destruction detection.

3. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises identifying alarm system data associated with instances in which alarm system events were incorrectly detected and identifying the regionalized pattern of events in which alarm system events were incorrectly detected.

4. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises identifying alarm system data associated with instances in which alarm system events were correctly detected and identifying the regionalized pattern of events in which alarm system events were correctly detected.

5. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises identifying alarm system data associated with instances in which alarm system events occurred, but were not detected and identifying the regionalized pattern of events in which alarm system events occurred, but were not detected.

6. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises tracking the received alarm system data and identifying whether the tracked alarm system data is associated with a particular type of alarm system event.

7. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises correlating different types of alarm events together.

8. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises correlating another type of data with alarm events.

9. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises evaluating successful alarm event detections in the particular geographic region and identifying similar alarm system behavior in the successful detections.

10. The server of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises evaluating unsuccessful alarm event detections in the particular geographic region, identifying similar alarm system behavior in the unsuccessful detections, and discounting the similar alarm system behavior.

11. The server of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise updating the regionalized pattern continuously as new data from the particular geographic region is aggregated and analyzed.

12. The server of claim 1 , wherein taking action for alarm systems in the particular geographic region comprises using the regionalized pattern to modify one or more parameters used by the alarm systems in the particular geographic region for detecting events.

13. The server of claim 1 , wherein using the regionalized pattern to modify one or more parameters used by the alarm systems in the particular geographic region for detecting events comprises reducing a parameter to provide faster detection of future alarm system events in the geographic particular region.

14. The server of claim 1 , wherein using the regionalized pattern to modify one or more parameters used by the alarm systems in the particular geographic region for detecting events comprises reducing an escrow period for alarm signals from the alarm systems in the particular geographic region based on the regionalized pattern indicating an increase in a number of alarm system events in the particular geographic region.

15. The server of claim 1 , wherein taking action for alarm systems in the particular geographic region comprises comparing the regionalized pattern to future alarm system behavior patterns to identify similar patterns that indicate alarm system events and, based on identification of similar patterns, providing enhanced alarm system event detection.

16. A method comprising:

receiving alarm system data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations;

aggregating the received alarm system data in geographic regions to enable detection of patterns of events in the geographic regions;

analyzing the aggregated data to identify a regionalized pattern of events associated with a particular geographic region; and

based on the identification of the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region, taking action for alarm systems in the particular geographic region.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein receiving alarm system data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations comprises receiving alarm system data related to alarm system destruction detection.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises identifying alarm system data associated with instances in which alarm system events were incorrectly detected and identifying the regionalized pattern of events in which alarm system events were incorrectly detected.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises identifying alarm system data associated with instances in which alarm system events were correctly detected and identifying the regionalized pattern of events in which alarm system events were correctly detected.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein analyzing the aggregated data to identify the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region comprises identifying alarm system data associated with instances in which alarm system events occurred, but were not detected and identifying the regionalized pattern of events in which alarm system events occurred, but were not detected.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2021
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: ENERGYHUB, INC.; ICN ACQUISITION, LLC; ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 055069/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2017
From: ALARM.COM, INCORPORATED; ENERGYHUB, INC.; ICN ACQUISITION, LLC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 044167/0235 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 11, 2016
From: TRUNDLE, STEPHEN SCOTT; SLAVIN, ALISON JANE; MARTIN, JEAN-PAUL
To: ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 040704/0526 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 14691196 · Apr 20, 2015
Continuation 14252325 · Apr 14, 2014
Continuation 13947207 · Jul 20, 2013
Continuation 13053994 · Mar 22, 2011
Provisional Application 61316034 · Mar 22, 2010