Methods and apparatus to improve viewer assignment by adjusting for a localized event
Methods, apparatus, systems and articles of manufacture to improve viewer assignment by adjusting for a localized event are disclosed. An example method includes identifying, by executing an instruction with a processor, heavy tuning data associated with panelists in a first area based on (1) a first number of households tuned to first media in the first area and (2) a first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area. The example method also includes determining, by executing an instruction with the processor, if the heavy tuning data represents a local bias based on a second percentage of exposure minutes tuned to second media in a second area.
1. An apparatus to perform viewership assignment, the apparatus comprising:
a localized event engine to:
obtain first tuning data associated with first panelists having tuned to first media in a first area from media meters that are unable to identify respective ones of the first panelists;
identify a subset of the first tuning data as heavy tuning data when (1) a first number of households tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies a first threshold and (2) a first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies a second threshold; and
determine that the heavy tuning data represents a local bias when a difference between a second percentage of exposure minutes associated with second panelists having viewed second media in a second area and a third percentage of exposure minutes associated with third panelists having tuned to the second media in the first area satisfies a third threshold, the second media being comparable media to the first media; and
a localized event selector to:
obtain viewing data associated with the second panelists in the second area from people meters that are able to identify respective ones of the second panelists; and
impute the viewing data associated with the second panelists in the second area for tuning data included in the heavy tuning data when the heavy tuning data is determined to represent the local bias, at least one of the localized event engine or the localized event selector implemented with hardware.
2. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further including a heavy exposure classifier to:
determine that the first number of households tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies the first threshold, the first threshold being a household number threshold, wherein respective ones of the first number of households have respective household sizes of two members; and
determine that the first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies the second threshold, the first percentage being a total number of exposure minutes tuned to the first media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes tuned to a plurality of media in the first area, the second threshold being an exposure percentage threshold.
3. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further including:
a comparable media identifier to identify the second media, the second media being comparable media to the first media; and
a comparable media percentage calculator to:
calculate the second percentage of exposure minutes, the second percentage being a first comparable media exposure percentage associated with the second area based on the comparable media, the second percentage corresponding to a first total number of exposure minutes associated with viewing the second media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes associated with viewing a plurality of media associated with the second area;
calculate the third percentage of exposure minutes, the third percentage being a second comparable media exposure percentage associated with the first area based on the comparable media, the third percentage corresponding to a second total number of exposure minutes tuned to the second media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes tuned to a plurality of media associated with the first area; and
calculate the difference between the first comparable media exposure percentage and the second comparable media exposure percentage.
4. The apparatus as defined in claim 3 , further including a localized event recipient data identifier to determine that the heavy tuning data represents the local bias when the difference satisfies the third threshold.
5. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the heavy tuning data is first heavy tuning data, the apparatus further including:
a localized event donor data identifier to identify second heavy tuning data associated with a third area exhibiting the local bias when the first heavy tuning data represents the local bias; and
a most likely viewer engine to impute media consumption behavior associated with the third area to the panelists in the first area.
6. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further including a collection engine to collect data associated with panelists in the first area and the second area via the media meters and the people meters.
7. A method to perform viewership assignment, the method comprising:
obtaining, by executing an instruction with a processor, first tuning data associated with first panelists having tuned to first media in a first area from media meters that are unable to identify respective ones of the first panelists;
identifying a subset of the first tuning data as heavy tuning data when (1) a first number of households tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies a first threshold and (2) a first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies a second threshold;
determining, by executing an instruction with the processor, that the heavy tuning data represents a local bias when a difference between a second percentage of exposure minutes associated with second panelists having viewed second media in a second area and a third percentage of exposure minutes associated with third panelists having tuned to the second media in the first area satisfies a third threshold, the second media being comparable media to the first media;
obtaining viewing data associated with the second panelists in the second area from people meters that are able to identify respective ones of the second panelists; and
imputing the viewing data associated with the second panelists in the second area for tuning data included in the heavy tuning data when the heavy tuning data is determined to represent the local bias.
8. The method as defined in claim 7 , wherein the identifying of the heavy tuning data includes:
determining that the first number of households tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies the first threshold, the first threshold being a household number threshold, wherein respective ones of the first number of households have respective household sizes of two members; and
determining that the first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies the second threshold, the first percentage being a total number of exposure minutes tuned to the first media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes tuned to a plurality of media in the first area, the second threshold being an exposure percentage threshold.
9. The method as defined in claim 7 , wherein the determining if the heavy tuning data represents a local bias includes:
identifying the second media, the second media being comparable media to the first media;
calculating the second percentage of exposure minutes, the second percentage being a first comparable media exposure percentage associated with the second area based on the comparable media, the second percentage corresponding to a first total number of exposure minutes associated with viewing the second media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes associated with viewing a plurality of media associated with the second area; and
calculating the third percentage of exposure minutes, the third percentage being a second comparable media exposure percentage associated with the first area based on the comparable media, the third percentage corresponding to a second total number of exposure minutes tuned to the second media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes tuned to a plurality of media associated with the first area.
10. The method as defined in claim 9 , further including:
calculating the difference between the first comparable media exposure percentage and the second comparable media exposure percentage; and
determining that the heavy tuning data represents a local bias when the difference satisfies the third threshold.
11. The method as defined in claim 9 , wherein the comparable media corresponds to a media station or a media genre associated with the first media.
12. The method as defined in claim 7 , wherein the heavy tuning data is first heavy tuning data, the method further including:
in response to determining that the first heavy tuning data represents a local bias, identifying second heavy tuning data associated with a third area exhibiting the local bias; and
imputing media consumption behavior associated with the third area to the panelists in the first area.
13. The method as defined in claim 7 , wherein the heavy tuning data corresponds to data points related to media consumption behavior of the panelists in the first area during a first time period of a plurality of time periods.
14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause a machine to at least:
obtain first tuning data associated with first panelists having tuned to first media in a first area from media meters that are unable to identify respective ones of the first panelists;
identify a subset of the first tuning data as heavy tuning data when (1) a first number of households tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies a first threshold and (2) a first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies a second threshold;
determine that the heavy tuning data represents a local bias when a difference between a second percentage of exposure minutes associated with second panelists having viewed second media in a second area and a third percentage of exposure minutes associated with third panelists having tuned to the second media in the first area satisfies a third threshold, the second media being comparable media to the first media;
obtain viewing data associated with the second panelists in the second area from people meters that are able to identify respective ones of the second panelists; and
impute the viewing data associated with the second panelist in the second area for viewing data included in the heavy tuning data when the heavy tuning data is determined to represent the local bias, at least one of the localized event engine or the localized event selector implemented with hardware.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as defined in claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the machine to identify the heavy tuning data by:
determining that the first number of households tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies the first threshold, the first threshold being a household number threshold, wherein respective ones of the first number of households have respective household sizes of two members; and
determining that the first percentage of exposure minutes tuned to the first media in the first area satisfies the second threshold, the first percentage being a total number of exposure minutes tuned to the first media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes tuned to a plurality of media in the first area, the second threshold being an exposure percentage threshold.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as defined in claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the machine to determine if the heavy tuning data represents a local bias by:
identifying the second media, the second media being comparable media to the first media;
calculating the second percentage of exposure minutes, the second percentage being a first comparable media exposure percentage associated with the second area based on the comparable media, the second percentage corresponding to a first total number of exposure minutes associated with viewing the second media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes associated with viewing a plurality of media associated with the second area; and
calculating the third percentage of exposure minutes, the third percentage being a second comparable media exposure percentage associated with the first area based on the comparable media, the third percentage corresponding to a second total number of exposure minutes tuned to the second media with respect to a plurality of exposure minutes tuned to a plurality of media associated with the first area.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as defined in claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the machine to:
calculate the difference between the first comparable media exposure percentage and the second comparable media exposure percentage; and
determine that the heavy tuning data represents a local bias when the difference satisfies the third threshold.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as defined in claim 14 , wherein the comparable media is to correspond to a media station or a media genre associated with the first media.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as defined in claim 14 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the machine to:
identify second heavy tuning data associated with a third area exhibiting the local bias when the heavy tuning data represents the local bias; and
impute media consumption behavior associated with the third area to the panelists in the first area.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as defined in claim 14 , wherein the heavy tuning data corresponds to data points related to media consumption behavior of the panelists in the first area during a first time period of a plurality of time periods.