IP Library Granted Patent US 10,298,042
Granted Patent B2
US 10,298,042 · App. 15/363,876 · Granted May 21, 2019

Resilient battery charging strategies to reduce battery degradation and self-discharging

Inventors: Seyyed Ali Pourmousavi Kani (San Jose, CA); Babak Asghari (San Jose, CA); Ratnesh Sharma (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: NEC Corporation
H02J7/0068H01M10/44H02J3/32H02J3/382H02J7/0057Y02E70/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,298,042
App. No.
15/363,876
Granted
May 21, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Computer-implemented methods and, a system are provided. A method includes constructing by an Energy Management System (EMS), one or more optimization-based techniques for resilient battery charging based on an optimization problem having an EMS cost-based objective function. The one or more optimization-based techniques are constructed to include a battery degradation metric in the optimization problem. The method further includes charging, by the EMS, one or more batteries in a power system in accordance with the one or more optimization-based techniques.

Claims (32)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

constructing, by an Energy Management System (EMS), one or more post-processing-based techniques for resilient battery charging, the one or more post-processing-based techniques being constructed to modify an existing EMS battery profile for a given battery under management by the EMS, wherein one of the one or more post-processing-based techniques includes formulating a stochastic approach based on a confidence interval and worst case scenario for the resilient battery charging to manipulate the existing EMS battery profile to achieve a lower amount of battery degradation of the given battery; and

charging, by the EMS, one or more batteries in a power system in accordance with the one or more optimization-based techniques.

2. The computer implement method of claim 1 , wherein the EMS existing battery profile is modified to decrease battery idle times and battery charge rates for the given battery.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising mining the existing EMS battery profile to generate one or more predictions of battery charging opportunities for decreasing battery idle times and battery charging rates.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the confidence interval is determined based on statistically-possible scenarios, including the worst case scenario.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

forecasting load demand and renewable energy generation to generate predictions of battery charging opportunities;

calculating any uncertainties associated with the predictions of battery charging opportunities; and

calculating a confidence interval to account for a worst case scenario regarding conditions relating to the battery charging opportunities.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the post-processing-based techniques are constructed to reduce at least one of cyclic battery aging and calendar battery aging.

7. A non-transitory article of manufacture tangibly embodying a computer readable program which when executed causes a computer to perform the steps of claim 1 .

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

constructing, by an Energy Management System (EMS), one or more optimization-based techniques for resilient battery charging based on an optimization problem having an EMS cost-based objective function, the one or more optimization-based techniques being constructed to include a battery degradation metric in the optimization problem such that the optimization problem includes a multi-objective function optimization problem including an the battery degradation metric is added as an additional objective function to the EMS cost-based objective function to alter the EMS cost-based objective function; and

charging, by the EMS, one or more batteries in a power system in accordance with the one or more optimization-based techniques.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the EMS cost-base objective function is formulated to minimize an EMS cost.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein said constructing step comprises:

adding the battery degradation metric to the EMS cost-based objective function to alter the EMS cost-based objective function; and

solving a new optimization problem, formulated to include the altered EMS cost-based objective function, as a multi-objective optimization.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein said constructing step comprises adding the battery degradation metric as a battery degradation cost to the EMS cost-based objective function to modify charging rates during charging events and idle times after charging events and discharging events relative to a state of the EMS cost-based objective function prior to adding the battery degradation cost.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein said adding step comprises:

converting a battery degradation function into a cost function; and

adding the cost function to the EMS cost-based objective function in the optimization problem.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein said constructing step comprises adding the battery degradation metric to the optimization problem by defining constraints for battery idle time and charging rates.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the constraints are defined in order to decrease a battery degradation to a minimum without changing a current objective function in the EMS cost-based objective function.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more optimization-based techniques are constructed to mitigate at least one of cyclic battery aging and calendar battery aging.

16. A non-transitory article of manufacture tangibly embodying a computer readable program which when executed causes a computer to perform the steps of claim 8 .

17. A system, comprising:

an Energy Management System (EMS), having a processor and a memory operable coupled to the processor, the EMS configured to:

constructing, by an Energy Management System (EMS), one or more post-processing-based techniques for resilient battery charging, the one or more post-processing-based techniques being constructed to modify an existing EMS battery profile for a given battery under management by the EMS, wherein one of the one or more post-process-based techniques includes formulating a stochastic approach based on a confidence interval and worst case scenario for the resilient battery charging to manipulate the existing EMS battery profile to achieve a lower amount of battery degradation of the given battery; and

charge one or more batteries in a power system in accordance with the one or more optimization-based techniques.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the EMS cost-based objective function is formulated to minimize an EMS cost.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2019
From: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
To: NEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 048592/0586 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 29, 2016
From: POURMOUSAVI KANI, SEYYED ALI; ASGHARI, BABAK; SHARMA, RATNESH K.
To: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 040455/0694 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62291639 · Feb 5, 2016
Related Publication 20170229881A1 · Aug 10, 2017