IP Library Granted Patent US 9,704,176
Granted Patent B2
US 9,704,176 · App. 15/365,157 · Granted Jul 11, 2017

Methods and apparatus to determine efficiencies of media delivery across platforms

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,704,176
App. No.
15/365,157
Granted
Jul 11, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus to determine efficiencies of media delivery across platforms are disclosed. An example method includes measuring, with a sensor, first neuro-response data from a person when exposed to media output via a first media delivery platform type. Measuring second neuro-response data from the person when exposed to media output via a second media delivery platform type, different than the first media delivery platform type. Accessing a first and second performance metric for the respective media delivery platform type, the performance metrics based on a first and second reach of the respective media delivery platform types with respect to a target group of audience members. Accessing a first and second effectiveness metric for the respective media delivery platform types, the effectiveness metric based on the respective neuro-response data. Rating at least one of the first or second media delivery platform types based on the first and the second platform metrics.

Claims (45)

1. An apparatus, comprising:

a sensor to measure first neuro-response data from a person when exposed to media output via a first media delivery platform type, the sensor to measure second neuro-response data from the person when exposed to media output via a second media delivery platform type, the first media delivery platform type being different than the second media delivery platform type;

a performance estimator to:

calculate a first performance metric based on a first reach of the first media delivery platform type with respect to a target group of audience members and a first effectiveness metric for the first media delivery platform type, the first effectiveness metric based on the first neuro-response data; and

calculate a second performance metric based on a second reach of the second media delivery platform type with respect to the target group of audience members and a second effectiveness metric for the second media delivery platform type, the second effectiveness metric based on the second neuro-response data; and

a platform selector to rate at least one of the first media delivery platform type or the second media delivery platform type based on the first and the second performance metrics, at least one of the performance estimator, the sensor or the platform selector including hardware.

2. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further including a performance per unit cost estimator to:

access a first ad campaign cost for the first media delivery platform type and a second ad campaign cost for the second media delivery platform type;

calculate a first platform performance per unit cost for the first media delivery platform type based on the first performance metric and the first ad campaign cost; and

calculate a second platform performance per unit cost for the second media delivery platform type based on the second performance metric and the second ad campaign cost; and

wherein the platform selector is further to select the first media delivery platform type or the second media delivery platform type for an ad campaign based on the first platform performance per unit cost and the second platform performance per unit cost.

3. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the person is representative of the target group.

4. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the first effectiveness metric measures at least one of: engagement, attention, memory, persuasion, effectiveness, emotion, or purchase intent.

5. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the performance estimator estimates a total performance of a media campaign based on the first and second performance metrics.

6. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the first media delivery platform type is one of a television platform, a mobile platform, an online platform, an outdoor platform, a radio platform or a print media platform.

7. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the first performance metric includes a product of the first effectiveness metric and the first reach.

8. A tangible computer readable storage medium comprising computer readable instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to at least:

measure, with a sensor, first neuro-response data from a person when exposed to media output via a first media delivery platform type, measure, with the sensor, second neuro-response data from the person when exposed to media output via a second media delivery platform type, the first media delivery platform type being different than the second media delivery platform type;

calculate a first performance metric based on a first reach of the first media delivery platform type with respect to a target group of audience members and a first effectiveness metric for the first media delivery platform type, the first effectiveness metric based on the first neuro-response data; and

calculate a second performance metric based on a second reach of the second media delivery platform type with respect to the target group of audience members and a second effectiveness metric for the second media delivery platform type, the second effectiveness metric based on the second neuro-response data; and

rate at least one of the first media delivery platform type or the second media delivery platform type based on the first and the second performance metrics.

9. The tangible computer readable storage medium as defined in claim 8 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to:

access a first ad campaign cost for the first media delivery platform type and a second ad campaign cost for the second media delivery platform type;

calculate a first platform performance per unit cost for the first media delivery platform type based on the first performance metric and the first ad campaign cost; and

calculate a second platform performance per unit cost for the second media delivery platform type based on the second performance metric and the second ad campaign cost; and

select the first media delivery platform type or the second media delivery platform type for an ad campaign based on the first platform performance per unit cost and the second platform performance per unit cost.

10. The tangible computer readable storage medium as defined in claim 8 , wherein the person is representative of the target group.

11. The tangible computer readable storage medium as defined in claim 8 , wherein the first effectiveness metric measures at least one of: engagement, attention, memory, persuasion, effectiveness, emotion, or purchase intent.

12. The tangible computer readable storage medium as defined in claim 8 , wherein the instructions cause the processor to estimate a total performance of a media campaign based on the first and second performance metrics.

13. The tangible computer readable storage medium as defined in claim 8 , wherein the first media delivery platform type is one of a television platform, a mobile platform, an online platform, an outdoor platform, a radio platform or a print media platform.

14. The tangible computer readable storage medium as defined in claim 8 , wherein the first performance metric includes a product of the first effectiveness metric and the first reach.

15. A method, comprising:

measuring, with a sensor, first neuro-response data from a person when exposed to media output via a first media delivery platform type;

measuring, with the sensor, second neuro-response data from the person when exposed to media output via a second media delivery platform type, the first media delivery platform type being different than the second media delivery platform type;

accessing, by executing an instruction with a processor, a first performance metric for the first media delivery platform type and a second performance metric for the second media delivery platform type, the first performance metric based on a first reach of the first media delivery platform type with respect to a target group of audience members and a first effectiveness metric for the first media delivery platform type, the first effectiveness metric based on the first neuro-response data, the second performance metric based on a second reach of the second media delivery platform type with respect to the target group and a second effectiveness metric for the second media delivery platform type, the second effectiveness metric based on the second neuro-response data; and

rating, by executing an instruction with the processor, at least one of the first media delivery platform type or the second media delivery platform type based on the first and the second platform metrics.

16. The method as defined in claim 15 , further including:

accessing, by executing an instruction with the processor, a first ad campaign cost for the first media delivery platform type and a second ad campaign cost for the second media delivery platform type;

calculating, by executing an instruction with the processor, a first platform performance per unit cost for the first media delivery platform type based on the first performance metric and the first ad campaign cost;

calculating, by executing an instruction with the processor, a second platform performance per unit cost for the second media delivery platform type based on the second performance metric and the second ad campaign cost;

selecting, by executing an instruction with the processor, the first media delivery platform type or the second media delivery platform type for an ad campaign based on the first platform performance per unit cost and the second platform performance per unit cost.

17. The method as defined in claim 15 , wherein the person is representative of the target group.

18. The method as defined in claim 15 , wherein the first effectiveness metric measures at least one of: engagement, attention, memory, persuasion, effectiveness, emotion, or purchase intent.

19. The method as defined in claim 15 , further including estimating, by executing an instruction with the processor, a total performance of a media campaign based on the first and second performance metrics.

20. The method as defined in claim 15 , wherein the first media delivery platform type is one of a television platform, a mobile platform, an online platform, an outdoor platform, a radio platform or a print media platform.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE (REEL 053473 / FRAME 0001) Recorded May 11, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: A. C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 063603/0001 →
RELEASE (REEL 054066 / FRAME 0064) Recorded May 11, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: A. C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 063605/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2023
From: GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; GRACENOTE, INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063574/0632 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2023
From: GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; GRACENOTE, INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 063561/0381 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 31, 2023
From: GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; GRACENOTE, INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 063560/0547 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENTS LISTED ON SCHEDULE 1 RECORDED ON 6-9-2020 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 053473 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SUPPLEMENTAL IP SECURITY AGREEMENT. Recorded Oct 7, 2020
From: A.C. NIELSEN (ARGENTINA) S.A.; A.C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; ACN HOLDINGS INC.; ACNIELSEN CORPORATION; ACNIELSEN ERATINGS.COM; AFFINNOVA, INC.; ART HOLDING, L.L.C.; ATHENIAN LEASING CORPORATION; CZT/ACN TRADEMARKS, L.L.C.; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC; NIELSEN AUDIO, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER INSIGHTS, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER NEUROSCIENCE, INC.; NIELSEN FINANCE CO.; NIELSEN FINANCE LLC; NIELSEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; NIELSEN MOBILE, LLC; NMR INVESTING I, INC.; TCG DIVESTITURE INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; VIZU CORPORATION; VNU MARKETING INFORMATION, INC.; NMR LICENSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.; NIELSEN HOLDING AND FINANCE B.V.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY B.V.; VNU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
To: CITIBANK, N.A
Reel/Frame 054066/0064 →
SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 9, 2020
From: A. C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; ACN HOLDINGS INC.; ACNIELSEN CORPORATION; ACNIELSEN ERATINGS.COM; AFFINNOVA, INC.; ART HOLDING, L.L.C.; ATHENIAN LEASING CORPORATION; CZT/ACN TRADEMARKS, L.L.C.; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC; NIELSEN AUDIO, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER INSIGHTS, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER NEUROSCIENCE, INC.; NIELSEN FINANCE CO.; NIELSEN FINANCE LLC; NIELSEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; NIELSEN MOBILE, LLC; NIELSEN UK FINANCE I, LLC; NMR INVESTING I, INC.; TCG DIVESTITURE INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; VIZU CORPORATION; VNU MARKETING INFORMATION, INC.; NMR LICENSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.; NIELSEN HOLDING AND FINANCE B.V.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY B.V.; VNU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053473/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 1, 2016
From: GURUMOORTHY, RAMACHANDRAN; KNIGHT, ROBERT T.
To: THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
Reel/Frame 040484/0266 →