IP Library Granted Patent US 10,431,020
Granted Patent B2
US 10,431,020 · App. 15/369,090 · Granted Oct 1, 2019

Method and apparatus for implementing a vehicle inspection waiver program

Inventors: Charles Michael McQuade (Issaquah, WA); Fred Fakkema (Des Moines, WA); Brett Brinton (Seattle, WA); William Brinton (Kent, WA)
Assignee: ZONAR SYSTEMS, INC.
G07C5/0808B60W30/143B60W40/09B60W50/14F01N9/002F02D41/029G06Q30/018G07C5/008G07C5/0816B60W2510/0638B60W2510/0657B60W2520/10B60W2530/10B60W2540/28B60W2550/142B60W2550/143B60W2550/402B60W2550/404B60W2750/40F02D2200/701
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,431,020
App. No.
15/369,090
Granted
Oct 1, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Position data received wirelessly from a vehicle enrolled in an inspection waiver program are employed to determine when the enrolled vehicle is approaching an inspection station. After determining that the enrolled vehicle is approaching an inspection station, and if the enrolled vehicle has a valid inspection waiver, a bypass confirmation can selectively be provided to the vehicle operator, authorizing the operator to bypass the inspection station. The task of determining when an enrolled vehicle is approaching the location of an inspection station can be performed using a processor disposed in the vehicle, or at a remote location separate from both the vehicle and the inspection station, or at the inspection station. The inspection stations can be mobile so that their locations are varied to prevent operators from intentionally avoiding an inspection, as may occur with fixed inspection stations.

Claims (40)

1. A method of administering a vehicle inspection program, utilizing inspection stations, each having an inspection station location, on an enrolled fleet of vehicles that each includes a suite of sensors, including a position sensor, that produce sensor data as each enrolled vehicle is being operated, sensor data being collected on a bus, and each enrolled fleet vehicle having a driver, and comprising:

continuously comparing the position sensor data for each vehicle with the inspection station locations to determine if any fleet vehicle is approaching an inspection station;

for each fleet vehicle, continuously delivering vehicle sensor data from the bus to a computer and using the computer to analyze vehicle sensor data, thereby creating a set of analysis results;

for each instance of a fleet vehicle approaching an inspection station, making a determination as to whether to permit the fleet vehicle approaching the inspection station to bypass inspection, based at least in part on the analysis results;

presenting the determination to each driver of a fleet vehicle approaching the inspection station and personnel of the inspection station being approached; and

inspecting fleet vehicles wherein a determination has been to not permit a fleet vehicle to bypass inspection, and not inspecting fleet vehicles wherein a determination has been made to permit a fleet vehicle to bypass inspection.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each set of analysis results includes a preliminary assessment of driver proficiency, and wherein the preliminary assessment of driver proficiency is used in making each determination as to whether to permit a fleet vehicle to bypass inspection.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein each preliminary assessment of driver proficiency, uses at least one from a group of alerts, received during a preceding time period and consisting essentially of:

a hard-braking alert;

a roll stability control alert; and

an anti-lock braking system alert.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein each fleet vehicle also produces accelerometer data and each preliminary assessment of driver proficiency includes an analysis of accelerometer data to arrive at an indication of driver steadiness within a preceding time period.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein some vehicles in the fleet of vehicles have engaged in a number of sudden accelerations, each having a severity, and wherein each analysis of accelerometer data includes a computation of a sudden acceleration score, based on the number and severity of sudden accelerations.

6. The method of claim 4 , further wherein in instances in which a fleet vehicle is inspected, inspection results are automatically compared with an accelerometer data history to determine the accuracy of analysis and improve the accuracy of analysis.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein each set of analysis results also relate to vehicle integrity.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to integrity of each enrolled fleet vehicle approaching the inspection station.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of faults.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of a brake system fault.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of a safety fault.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the probability of a condition which could cause an on-road failure, requiring a fleet vehicle approaching the inspection station to pull to the side of the roadway.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the probability of engine overheating.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein inspection station utilization rate is an additional factor in determining whether to permit a fleet vehicle approaching the inspection station to bypass inspection.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein said analysis is performed in a computer that is onboard each fleet vehicle.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein said analysis is performed at a remote computer that receives data by telemetry from each fleet vehicle.

17. A system for selectively granting bypass permissions to a fleet of vehicles that are enrolled in an inspection bypass program, the method comprising:

a suite of sensors, disposed within each fleet vehicle, and adapted to gather a set of parameters, including brake temperature, oil temperature, brake pressure, roll stability control and anti-lock braking system status;

a bus assembly adapted to gather said information from said sensors;

a mechanism for determining when an enrolled fleet vehicle is approaching an inspection station;

a telematics and data processing assembly, configured to, for each fleet vehicle, receive data from said suite of sensors and to analyze the data from said suite of sensors, thereby creating a set of analysis results and to make a determination as to whether to permit any of the fleet vehicles that are approaching an inspection station to bypass inspection, based at least in part on the analysis results for that vehicle.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein each set of analysis results includes a preliminary assessment of driver proficiency.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein each preliminary assessment of driver proficiency, use at least one from a group of alerts, received during a preceding time period and consisting essentially of:

a hard-braking alert;

a roll stability control alert; and

an anti-lock braking system alert.

20. The system of claim 17 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to vehicle integrity.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of faults.

22. The system of claim 21 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of a brake system fault.

23. The system of claim 20 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of a safety fault.

24. The system of claim 23 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the presence of a safety fault which could cause an on road failure, requiring a fleet vehicle to pull to the side of the roadway.

25. The system of claim 20 , wherein each set of analysis results relate to the probability of engine overheating.

Assignments (1)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 2, 2024
From: ZONAR SYSTEMS, INC.
To: TWIN BROOK CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 069466/0630 →
Continuity (24)
Continuation In Part 15233705 · Aug 10, 2016
Continuation In Part 15005746 · Jan 25, 2016
Continuation In Part 14287184 · May 26, 2014
Continuation In Part 14214008 · Mar 14, 2014
Continuation In Part 14206760 · Mar 12, 2014
Continuation In Part 13857982 · Apr 5, 2013
Continuation In Part 13854919 · Apr 1, 2013
Continuation In Part 13725128 · Dec 21, 2012
Continuation In Part 13725266 · Dec 21, 2012
Continuation In Part 13725886 · Dec 21, 2012
Continuation In Part 13725183 · Dec 21, 2012
Continuation In Part 13719211 · Dec 18, 2012
Continuation In Part 13719208 · Dec 18, 2012
Continuation In Part 13719218 · Dec 18, 2012
Continuation 12959182 · Dec 2, 2010
Provisional Application 61800726 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 61801082 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 61802191 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 61801725 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 61621456 · Apr 6, 2012
Provisional Application 61618827 · Apr 1, 2012
Provisional Application 61580197 · Dec 24, 2011
Provisional Application 61580190 · Dec 23, 2011
Related Publication 20170084091A1 · Mar 23, 2017