IP Library Granted Patent US 9,639,087
Granted Patent B1
US 9,639,087 · App. 15/371,045 · Granted May 2, 2017

Emergency landing using inertial sensors

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,639,087
App. No.
15/371,045
Granted
May 2, 2017
Kind
B1
Abstract

An emergency landing procedure that includes a sequence of control settings is continuously generated. An aircraft is landed, including by using the sequence of control settings and a set of one or more inertial sensors to control an actuator.

Claims (66)

1. An aircraft, comprising:

an actuator;

a set of one or more inertial sensors; and a processor configured to:

continuously generate an emergency landing procedure that includes a sequence of control settings;

detect a local maximum in the other one of the desired signal and the measured signal;

determine if a time difference between the local minimum and the local maximum does not exceed a time threshold;

determine if an amplitude difference between the local minimum and the local maximum exceeds an amplitude threshold;

in the event it is determined that the time difference does not exceed the time threshold and it is determined that the amplitude difference exceeds the amplitude threshold,

decide to land the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator; and

land the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator.

2. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein:

the actuator is associated with one of a plurality of rotors in a multicopter; and

the sequence of control settings are associated with rotational speed.

3. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein:

the sequence of control settings includes a sequence of desired attitudes;

the emergency landing procedure further includes a plurality of execution times at which the sequence of desired attitudes are executed; and

landing the aircraft further includes executing the sequence of desired attitudes according to the plurality of execution times.

4. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein:

the processor is further configured to receive an indication to land the aircraft; and

the processor lands the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator, in response to receiving the indication.

5. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein:

the processor is further configured to receive an indication to land the aircraft;

the processor lands the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator, in response to receiving the indication; and

the indication is transmitted from an on-the-ground controller.

6. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein:

the processor is further configured to receive an indication to land the aircraft;

the processor lands the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator, in response to receiving the indication; and

the indication is received via a controller included in the aircraft.

7. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive a set of one or more actuator control signals;

receive state information associated with the aircraft and which results from the set of one or more actuator control signals; and

set, based at least in part on the set of actuator control signals and the state information, a setting associated with continuously generating the emergency landing procedure.

8. A method, comprising:

continuously generating, using a processor, an emergency landing procedure that includes a sequence of control settings;

detecting a local maximum in the other one of the desired signal and the measured signal;

determining if a time difference between the local minimum and the local maximum does not exceed a time threshold;

determining if an amplitude difference between the local minimum and the local maximum exceeds an amplitude threshold;

in the event it is determined that the time difference does not exceed the time threshold and it is determined that the amplitude difference exceeds the amplitude threshold,

deciding to land the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator; and

landing an aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and a set of one or more inertial sensors to control the actuator.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the actuator is associated with one of a plurality of rotors in a multicopter; and

the sequence of control settings are associated with rotational speed.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the sequence of control settings includes a sequence of desired attitudes;

the emergency landing procedure further includes a plurality of execution times at which the sequence of desired attitudes are executed; and

landing the aircraft further includes executing the sequence of desired attitudes according to the plurality of execution times.

11. The method of claim 8 further including receiving an indication to land the aircraft, wherein landing the aircraft includes using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator, in response to receiving the indication.

12. The method of claim 8 further including receiving an indication to land the aircraft, wherein:

landing the aircraft includes using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator, in response to receiving the indication; and

the indication is transmitted from an on-the-ground controller.

13. The method of claim 8 further including receiving an indication to land the aircraft, is wherein:

landing the aircraft includes using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator, in response to receiving the indication; and

the indication is received via a controller included in the aircraft.

14. The method of claim 8 further including:

receiving a set of one or more actuator control signals;

receiving state information associated with the aircraft and which results from the set of one or more actuator control signals; and

setting, based at least in part on the set of actuator control signals and the state information, a setting associated with continuously generating the emergency landing procedure.

15. A computer program product, the computer program product being embodied in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:

continuously generating an emergency landing procedure that includes a sequence of control settings;

detecting a local maximum in the other one of the desired signal and the measured signal;

determining if a time difference between the local minimum and the local maximum does not exceed a time threshold;

determining if an amplitude difference between the local minimum and the local maximum exceeds an amplitude threshold;

in the event it is determined that the time difference does not exceed the time threshold and it is determined that the amplitude difference exceeds the amplitude threshold,

deciding to land the aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and the set of inertial sensors to control the actuator; and

landing an aircraft, including by using the sequence of control settings and a set of one or more inertial sensors to control the actuator.

Assignments (7)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2023
From: ONE AERO, LLC
To: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063713/0367 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2022
From: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
To: ONE AERO, LLC
Reel/Frame 059503/0382 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2021
From: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
To: ONE AERO, LLC
Reel/Frame 058029/0610 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2020
From: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
To: ONE AERO, LLC
Reel/Frame 054206/0714 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2018
From: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
To: ONE AERO, LLC
Reel/Frame 047739/0947 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2018
From: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
To: ONE AERO, LLC
Reel/Frame 047308/0927 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2017
From: CUTLER, MARK JOHNSON
To: KITTY HAWK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041202/0471 →