IP Library Granted Patent US 10,503,611
Granted Patent B1
US 10,503,611 · App. 15/390,415 · Granted Dec 10, 2019

Data protection management for distributed storage

Inventors: Shashwat Srivastav (Seattle, WA); Mikhail Danilov (Saint-Petersburg, RU); Sriram Sankaran (Redmond, WA); Jun Luo (Bellevue, WA); Subba R. Gaddamadugu (Westborough, MA); Peter M. Musial (Arlington, MA); Andrew D. Robertson (Washington, DC); Chen Wang (Shanghai, CN)
Assignee: EMC IP Holding Company LLC
G06F11/1469G06F3/064G06F3/065G06F3/067G06F3/0619G06F11/1076G06F11/1451G06F11/1464H03M13/154G06F2201/805G06F2201/82
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,503,611
App. No.
15/390,415
Granted
Dec 10, 2019
Kind
B1
Abstract

An efficient and scalable method of managing data protection in a geographically distributed storage system is provided using erasure coding. Each zone in the geographically distributed storage system of multiple zones or clusters encodes primary backup chunks replicated from original data chunks in remote zones to create coding chunks. The zone retains one of the coding chunks and distributes the remaining coding chunks to remote zones for future recovery from dual and more complex failures. Upon completion, the primary backup chunks and peer backup chunks can safely be deleted to reduce overhead. Encoding k primary backup chunks to create m coding chunks, and distributing the m coding chunks to different remote zones assures recovery from 1 to m zone/cluster/chunk failures. After 1 to m zone failures the unaffected zones are each able to recover all of the unavailable chunks by retrieving from each other any of the unaffected zone's distributed coding chunks and still available original data chunks, and restoring the content of the unavailable chunks by decoding the combination of the retained coding chunk, distributed coding chunk, and any still available original data chunks.

Claims (56)

1. A computer-executable method of managing data protection in a distributed storage system, the method comprising:

configuring a distributed storage system into a plurality of at least k+m zones in which each zone accumulates k equal-sized primary backup chunks and one or more peer backup chunks of original data chunks replicated from different remote zones; and

preparing the distributed storage system for recovery from a failure of 1 to m zones of the plurality of the at least k+m zones by performing the operations of:

encoding, at each zone of the plurality of at least k+m zones, the k equal-sized primary backup chunks to create m equalized-sized redundant coding chunks using an erasure coding such that the distributed storage system has at least k+m chunks of data,

retaining one of the m coding chunks in that zone of the plurality of at least k+m zones,

distributing each of the remaining m−1 coding chunks to a different one of the remaining m−1 zones, and

deleting each of k equal-sized primary backup chunks and the one or more peer backup chunks in that zone of plurality of at least k+m zones to reduce storage overhead.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

recovering unavailable chunks from a failure of 1 to m zones including performing, in each of the zones unaffected by the failure, any one or more of:

identifying any of still available coding chunks created and retained by the zone, and

retrieving any of the still available coding chunks distributed to the zone from another zone, and

creating local copies of any of the still available original data chunks from which the still available coding chunks were created; and

reconstructing as many unavailable chunks as possible from the still available coding chunks and the still available original data chunks.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of at least k+m zones into which the distributed storage system is configured is distributed across a geographical area.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distributed storage system is a cloud-based storage system accessible over an inter-network.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the m coding chunks are equal-sized and belong to a set of blocks of data stored in a partitioned disk space.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein an index layer maps one or more file-names to data stored within the distributed data storage system, and wherein the index layer is to manage secondary indices used to manage the data stored on the distributed data storage system.

7. A distributed storage system comprising:

a cluster of nodes in communication with one or more data storage arrays and a storage engine, each node having a processor configured to execute an application, the storage engine enabling the application to process data I/O requests to and from the one or more data storage arrays, the processor further configured to:

configure the cluster of nodes into a plurality of k+m zones in which each zone manages data stored in the one or more data storage arrays, the data including k equal-sized primary backup chunks and one or more peer backup chunks of original data chunks replicated from different remote zones; and

prepare the cluster of nodes for recovery from a failure of any one or more zones in the plurality of zones, including causing each zone in the plurality of zones to:

encode the equal-sized primary backup chunks to create m coding chunks using erasure coding such that the distributed storage system has at least k+m chunks of data,

retain one of the m coding chunks in the zone,

distribute each of the other m−1 coding chunks not retained to different zones in the plurality of zones, and

delete any primary backup chunks and any peer backup chunks from the zone to reduce storage overhead.

8. The distributed storage system of claim 7 , the processor further configured to:

detect the failure of the any one or more zones in the plurality of zones;

recover from the failure, including causing an unaffected zone unaffected by the failure to:

retrieve from other unaffected zones any of the still available coding chunks;

create local copies of any of still available original data chunks from which the coding chunks were created; and

reconstruct any unavailable chunks from the still available coding chunks and the still available original data chunks.

9. The distributed storage system of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of zones into which the cluster of nodes is configured is distributed across a geographical area.

10. The distributed storage system of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of zones into which the cluster of nodes is configured is a cloud-based storage system accessible over an inter-network.

11. The distributed storage system of claim 7 , wherein the erasure coding used to encode the primary backup chunks into coding chunks is bit matrix erasure coding.

12. The system of claim 7 , wherein each of the m coding chunks are equal-sized and belong to a set of blocks of data stored in a partitioned disk space.

13. The system of claim 7 , wherein an index layer maps one or more file-names to data stored within the distributed data storage system, and wherein the index layer is to manage secondary indices used to manage the data stored on the distributed data storage system.

14. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations for data protection management in a distributed storage system, the operations comprising:

configuring a cluster of nodes into a plurality of k+m zones in which each zone manages data stored in the one or more data storage arrays, the data including k equal-sized primary backup chunks and one or more peer backup chunks of original data chunks replicated from different remote zones; and

preparing the cluster of nodes for recovery from a failure of any one or more zones in the plurality of zones, including causing each zone in the plurality of zones to:

encode the k equal-sized primary backup chunks to create in coding chunks using erasure coding,

retain one of the m coding chunks in the zone,

distribute each of the other m−1 coding chunks not retained to different zones in the plurality of zones, and

delete any primary backup chunks from which coding chunks were created and any peer backup chunks from the zone to reduce storage overhead.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , the operations further comprising:

detecting the failure of the any one or more zones in the plurality of zones; and

recovering from the failure, including causing an unaffected zone unaffected by the failure to:

retrieve from other unaffected zones any of still available coding chunks,

create local copies of any of the still available original data chunks, from which the still available coding chunks were created and

reconstruct any unavailable chunks from the still available coding chunks and the still available original data chunks.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the erasure coding used to encode the primary backup chunks to create coding chunks is bit matrix erasure coding.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein:

the plurality of zones into which the cluster is configured is at least k+m zones;

the any one or more zones in the plurality of the at least k+m zones from which the cluster of nodes can recover is from 1 to m zones of the plurality of the at least k+m zones; and

the erasure coding used to encode primary backup chunks to create coding chunks is a bit matrix encoding function having parameters k+m, in which k primary backup chunks are encoded to create m coding chunks.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , each of the m coding chunks are equal-sized and belong to a set of blocks of data stored in a partitioned disk space.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein an index layer maps one or more file-names to data stored within the distributed data storage system, and wherein the index layer is to manage secondary indices used to manage the data stored on the distributed data storage.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053546/0001) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 071642/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (052216/0758) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 060438/0680 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AF REEL 052243 FRAME 0773 Recorded Nov 2, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 058001/0152 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2020
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053546/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 26, 2020
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 052243/0773 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES) Recorded Mar 24, 2020
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 052216/0758 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 21, 2019
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049452/0223 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2017
From: SRIVASTAV, SHASHWAT; DANILOV, MIKHAIL; SANKARAN, SRIRAM; LUO, JUN; GADDAMADUGU, SUBBA R.; MUSIAL, PETER M.; ROBERTSON, ANDREW D.; WANG, CHEN
To: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 041587/0256 →
Cited By (6)
US 12,204,657 US 12,248,566 US 12,411,962 US 12,450,223 US 12,561,428 US 12,693,803