IP Library Granted Patent US 10,026,274
Granted Patent B2
US 10,026,274 · App. 15/421,921 · Granted Jul 17, 2018

Method and apparatus for alert validation

Inventor: Ehud B. Reiter (Aberdeen, GB)
Assignee: ARRIA DATA2TEXT LIMITED
G08B5/36G06F17/2247G06F17/248G06F17/27G06F17/2881G06F19/30G08B5/22G08B23/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,026,274
App. No.
15/421,921
Granted
Jul 17, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products are described herein that are configured to enable validation of an alert condition. In some example embodiments, a method is provided that comprises detecting an alert condition. The method of this embodiment may also include generating a set of messages based on one or more key events in a primary data channel and one or more significant events in one or more related data channels in response to the alert condition. The method of this embodiment may also include determining a validity of the alert condition based on the set of messages that express the one or more key events, the one or more significant events, a relationship between the one or more key events and the one or more significant events, an alert context and the one or causes of the alert condition.

Claims (38)

1. A method for determining a validity of an alert condition associated with one or more data channels, the method comprising:

determining, using at least one processor, at least one key event in each of one or more primary data channels, wherein the at least one key event indicates the alert condition;

identifying, using the at least one processor, one or more secondary data channels, wherein the one or more secondary data channels are related to the one or more primary data channels, and each of the one or more secondary data channels includes at least one significant event;

determining, based on at least one of the one or more primary data channels, the one or more secondary data channels, and an event relationship between the at least one key event and the at least one significant event, whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to a notification time; and

in response to determining that the alert condition is not intermittently active, generating an alert condition validation text, wherein the alert condition validation text is configured to linguistically express at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and one or more causes of the alert condition.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

in response to determining that the alert condition is intermittently active, generating an alert condition invalidation text, wherein the alert condition invalidation text is configured to linguistically express that the alert condition is intermittently active and at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and the one or more causes of the alert condition.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying, using at least one processor, one or more historical data channels, wherein the one or more historical data channels include historical information relating to at least one of the alert condition, the one or more primary data channels, and the one or more secondary data channels.

4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time includes:

determining, based on the one or more historical data channels, whether at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, wherein the at least one prior alert condition is related to the at least one key event;

in response to determining that the at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, calculating a time period between the at least one prior alert condition and the alert condition; and

determining, using the at least one processor, whether the time period satisfies a pre-determined threshold.

5. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

determining whether at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition; and

in response to determining that the at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition, identifying at least one alert validation outcome.

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time is based at least partially on the at least one alert validation outcome.

7. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the pre-determined threshold is determined based on at least one of a domain model, a global parameter, and one or more user inputs.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the notification time is an alert condition time or a user-defined time.

9. An apparatus for determining a validity of an alert condition associated with one or more data channels, the apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one non-transitory memory including program code, the at least one memory and the program code being configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

determine, using at least one processor, at least one key event in each of one or more primary data channels, wherein the at least one key event indicates the alert condition;

identify, using the at least one processor, one or more secondary data channels, wherein the one or more secondary data channels are related to the one or more primary data channels, and each of the one or more secondary data channels includes at least one significant event;

determine, based on at least one of the one or more primary data channels, the one or more secondary data channels, and an event relationship between the at least one key event and the at least one significant event, whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to a notification time; and

in response to determining that the alert condition is not intermittently active, generate an alert condition validation text, wherein the alert condition validation text is configured to linguistically express at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and one or more causes of the alert condition.

10. The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein the at least one non-transitory memory and the program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

in response to determining that the alert condition is intermittently active, generate an alert condition invalidation text, wherein the alert condition invalidation text is configured to linguistically express that the alert condition is intermittently active and at least one of the at least one key event, the at least one significant event, the event relationship, and the one or more causes of the alert condition.

11. The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein the at least one non-transitory memory and the program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

identify, using at least one processor, one or more historical data channels, wherein the one or more historical data channels include historical information relating to at least one of the alert condition, the one or more primary data channels, and the one or more secondary data channels.

12. The apparatus according to claim 11 , wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time includes:

determine, based on the one or more historical data channels, whether at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, wherein the at least one prior alert condition is related to the at least one key event;

in response to determining that the at least one prior alert condition exists before the alert condition, calculate a time period between the at least one prior alert condition and the alert condition; and

determine, using the at least one processor, whether the time period satisfies a pre-determined threshold.

13. The apparatus according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one non-transitory memory and the program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to:

determine whether at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition; and

in response to determining that the at least one alert validation is performed for the at least one prior alert condition, identify at least one alert validation outcome.

14. The apparatus according to claim 5 , wherein determining whether the alert condition is intermittently active leading up to the notification time is based at least partially on the at least one alert validation outcome.

15. The apparatus according to claim 12 , wherein the pre-determined threshold is determined based on at least one of a domain model, a global parameter, and one or more user inputs.

16. The apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein the notification time is an alert condition time or a user-defined time.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 9, 2025
From: ARRIA DATA2TEXT LIMITED
To: COLLATERAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072202/0480 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2018
From: REITER, EHUD B.
To: DATA2TEXT LIMITED
Reel/Frame 045305/0740 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 21, 2018
From: DATA2TEXT LIMITED
To: ARRIA DATA2TEXT LIMITED
Reel/Frame 045305/0852 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 14311806 · Jun 23, 2014
Continuation 14023023 · Sep 10, 2013
Continuation PCTUS2012053115 · Aug 30, 2012
Related Publication 20170365137A1 · Dec 21, 2017