IP Library Granted Patent US 10,220,862
Granted Patent B2
US 10,220,862 · App. 15/422,055 · Granted Mar 5, 2019

Method for operating a transport assembly in the form of a linear stator linear motor

Inventors: Stefan Huber (Salzburg, AT); Helmut Herzog (Salzburg, AT)
Assignee: B&R INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION GMBH
B61L23/34B60L13/03B61L23/14B61L25/021B61L25/025B61L2201/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,220,862
App. No.
15/422,055
Granted
Mar 5, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

In order to avoid a collision between transport units, which are moving along a transport path of a transport assembly, and/or the collision of a transport unit with a barrier and/or the surpassing of a local speed limit, for at least one transport unit (TEi) it is preemptively determined if for the transport unit (TEi) a stopping maneuver (SMi) with a predetermined cinematic may be performed, without causing a violation of these safety requirements. In case of violation of a safety requirement, the stopping maneuver is effectively activated.

Claims (17)

1. A method for operating a transport assembly in the form of a long stator linear motor, in which a plurality of transport units are moved along a transport path, comprising:

controlling the movement of the transport units along the transport path by setting setpoints of movement through at least one transport unit control;

preemptively determining for at least one first transport unit if a stopping maneuver for the transport unit is executable with a predetermined kinematic, so that

a) a collision of this transport unit with a preceding second transport unit or with a barrier of the transport path is avoided, or

b) exceeding a predetermined local speed limitation in a position of the transport path by the first transport unit is avoided, or

c) a matching movement of the first transport unit to a speed of a preceding second transport unit is possible; and

when at least one of a), b) or c) is violated, effectively activating a stopping maneuver of the first transport unit.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein for the preceding second transport unit, the method further comprises checking a stopping maneuver if, during an assumed stopping maneuver, the first transport unit is within a predetermined minimum distance to the second transport unit.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein for the first transport unit and for the second transport unit based on knowledge of a kinematic implementation of a respective stopping maneuver, the method further comprises calculating and comparing a stopping point or a stopping distance in order to determine, if the first transport unit and the second transport unit are within the predetermined minimum to each other.

4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising checking if the first transport unit during an assumed stopping maneuver is within a predetermined minimum distance to the barrier.

5. The method according to claim 2 , further setting a minimum distance, which indicates how close the transport unit can get to the preceding transport unit or the barrier.

6. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising checking if the speed of the first transport unit during an assumed stopping maneuver is reducible from a current actual speed to a limit speed set by the speed limitation, without the first transport unit getting within a predetermined minimum distance to the defined area of speed limitation.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein, from knowledge of the kinematic implementation of the assumed stopping maneuver, the method further comprises calculating a speed point or a braking distance for the first transport unit and determining if the speed of the transport unit is reducible to the limit speed before the area of speed limitation.

8. The method according to claim 6 , further comprising setting a minimum distance, which indicates how close the transport unit may get to the area of speed limitation.

9. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising checking if the speed of the first transport unit in case of an assumed stopping maneuver is reducible from a current actual speed to a speed of the second transport unit, so that between the first transport unit and the second transport unit a safety distance, which is obtained from the concrete kinematic implementation of the stopping maneuver is maintained.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein, from knowledge of the kinematic implementation of the stopping maneuver, the method further comprises calculating a speed point or a matching distance for the first transport unit and determining if the speed of the first transport unit is reducible to the speed of the second transport unit.

11. The method according to claim 9 , wherein a minimum distance to be maintained is considered in addition to the safety distance.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2025
From: B&R INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION GMBH
To: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
Reel/Frame 070109/0889 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NUMBER OF RECORDED PROPERTY #18 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 044861 FRAME: 0829. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Oct 10, 2018
From: BERNECKER + RAINER INDUSTRIE-ELEKTRONIK GES.M.B.H.
To: B&R INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION GMBH
Reel/Frame 047211/0782 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 13, 2017
From: BERNECKER + RAINER INDUSTRIE-ELEKTRONIK GES.M.B.H.
To: B&R INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION GMBH
Reel/Frame 044861/0929 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 10, 2017
From: HUBER, STEFAN; HERZOG, HELMUT
To: BERNECKER + RAINER INDUSTRIE-ELEKTRONIK GES.M.B.H.
Reel/Frame 041975/0169 →
Priority Claims (1)
AT A 50058/2016 · Feb 2, 2016 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20170217460A1 · Aug 3, 2017
Cited By (1)
US 12,421,056