IP Library Granted Patent US 9,989,490
Granted Patent B2
US 9,989,490 · App. 15/444,940 · Granted Jun 5, 2018

Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in sensor systems, devices, and related methods

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,989,490
App. No.
15/444,940
Granted
Jun 5, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A diagnostic Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) procedure is applied to measure values of impedance-related parameters for one or more sensing electrodes. The parameters may include real impedance, imaginary impedance, impedance magnitude, and/or phase angle. The measured values of the impedance-related parameters are then used in performing sensor diagnostics, calculating a highly-reliable fused sensor glucose value based on signals from a plurality of redundant sensing electrodes, calibrating sensors, detecting interferents within close proximity of one or more sensing electrodes, and testing surface area characteristics of electroplated electrodes. Advantageously, impedance-related parameters can be defined that are substantially glucose-independent over specific ranges of frequencies. An Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) enables implementation of the EIS-based diagnostics, fusion algorithms, and other processes based on measurement of EIS-based parameters.

Claims (28)

1. A method of calculating a single, fused sensor glucose value based on respective glucose measurement signals of a plurality of redundant sensing electrodes, comprising:

performing respective electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) procedures for each of the plurality of redundant sensing electrodes to obtain values of at least one impedance-based parameter for each said sensing electrode;

measuring the electrode current (Isig) for each of the plurality of redundant sensing electrodes;

calculating a bound-check reliability index and a noise-check reliability index for each said sensing electrode based on said measured Isig and said values of the at least one impedance-based parameter;

calculating a dip reliability index for each said sensing electrode based on one or more of said at least one impedance-based parameter;

calculating a sensitivity-loss reliability index for each said sensing elect le based on one or more of said at least one impedance-based parameter;

calculating a single fused Isig based on the respective bound-check reliability index, noise-check reliability index, dip reliability index, sensitivity-loss reliability index, and respective Isig of each of the plurality of redundant sensing electrodes; and

calibrating said single fused Isig to obtain said single fused sensor glucose value, wherein said single fused Isig is calibrated by using a blood glucose (BG) value.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said at least one impedance-based parameter includes at least one of real impedance, imaginary impedance, and Nyquist slope.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said at least one impedance-based parameter is 1 kHz real impedance.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein calculation of said bound check reliability index and said noise check reliability index include determining whether each said measured Isig and said values of the 1 kHz real impedance fall within respective predetermined ranges for said bound check and noise check.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein said predetermined range for the 1 kHz real impedance bound check is between 0.3e+4 and 2e+4.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said at least one impedance-based parameter is imaginary impedance.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein said imaginary impedance is measured at about 1 kHz over a period of time.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein calculation of said bound check reliability index and said noise check reliability index include determining Whether said values of the 1 kHz imaginary impedance fall within respective predetermined ranges for said bound check and noise check.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein said predetermined range for the 1 kHz imaginary impedance bound check is between −2e+3 and zero.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein, prior to calculation of said single fused Isig, said respective measured Isig of each of the plurality of redundant sensing electrodes is first filtered to remove any EIS-induced spikes therein.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein each said respective EIS procedure is performed for a range of frequencies.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the at least one impedance-based parameter are substantially glucose-independent.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculation of said dip reliability index is additionally based on the measured Isig for each said electrode.

14. The method of claim 1 , further including calculating, for each of the plurality of electrodes, a weight based on said electrode's bound-check reliability index, noise-check reliability index, dip reliability index, sensitivity-loss reliability index.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein said single fused sensor glucose value is calculated based on the respective weights and Isigs of each of the plurality of redundant sensing electrodes.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein said bound-check reliability index and noise-check reliability index are calculated based on values of 1 kHz imaginary impedance and 1 kHz real impedance.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein calculation of said bound-check reliability index and noise-check reliability index is further based on values of 0.105 Hz imaginary impedance and 0.105 Hz real impedance.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein calculation of said bound check reliability index and said noise check reliability index include determining whether said values of the 0.105 Hz real impedance fall between 2e+4 and 7e+4.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein calculation of said bound check reliability index and said noise check reliability index include determining whether said values of the 0.105 Hz imaginary impedance fall between −2e+5 and 0.25e+5.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein calculation of said bound-check, reliability index and noise-check reliability index is further based on values of Nyquist slope.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein calculation of said bound check reliability index and said noise check reliability index include determining whether said values of Nyquist slope fall between 2 and 5.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 16, 2026
From: MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.; COMPANION MEDICAL, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 074394/0237 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 28, 2017
From: YANG, NING; GAUTHAM, RAGHAVENDHAR; LIANG, BRADLEY C.; SHAH, RAJIV
To: MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC.
Reel/Frame 041400/0190 →