IP Library Granted Patent US 10,865,635
Granted Patent B2
US 10,865,635 · App. 15/458,877 · Granted Dec 15, 2020

Method of controlling a gas vent system for horizontal wells

Inventors: Kalpesh Singal (Glenville, NY); Deepak Aravind (Bangalore, IN); Jeremy Daniel VanDam (Edmond, OK); Yashwanth Tummala (Chicago, IL)
Assignee: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, LLC
E21B47/06E21B43/128E21B43/38
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,865,635
App. No.
15/458,877
Granted
Dec 15, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of controlling a gas vent system to vent gas from a wellbore that includes a substantially horizontal portion. The method includes determining an initial operating mode of the gas vent system; generating one or more control signals established for the determined initial operation mode; and transmitting the one or more control signals to a gas vent valve that commands the closing or opening of the gas vent valve. A controller for use in venting gas from a wellbore is additionally disclosed.

Claims (53)

1. A method of controlling a gas vent system to vent gas from a wellbore that includes a substantially horizontal portion, the wellbore configured to channel a mixture of fluids, said method comprising:

determining an initial operating mode of the gas vent system, wherein the step of determining an initial operating mode includes determining a downhole pressure (PDH) and a gas venting rate of the gas vent system, wherein determining a downhole pressure (PDH) includes determining an initial target downhole pressure (PDH) set point, and wherein determining the gas venting rate includes setting the gas venting rate to one of: (i) fluctuate above an initial target gas venting rate set point (ii) fluctuate below an initial target gas venting rate set point, or (iii) remain at an initial target gas venting rate set point, and measuring, and comparing a dynamic response of the downhole pressure (PDH) to the gas venting rate;

generating one or more control signals established for the determined initial operation mode; and

transmitting the one or more control signals to a gas vent choke valve that commands a closing or opening of the gas vent choke valve.

2. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein measuring and comparing a dynamic response of the downhole pressure (PDH) to the gas venting rate include at least one of:

calculating and comparing a phase difference in oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) with oscillations in the initial target venting rate set point;

calculating and comparing a gradient with a target gradient; or

calculating and comparing a measured current with a target electric submersible pump (ESP) current.

3. The method in accordance with claim 2 , further comprising employing one or more control laws for a gradient mode of operation as a result of:

a calculated phase difference between oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) and oscillations in the target gas venting rate set point less than a target phase difference;

a calculated gradient less than the target gradient; or

a calculated ESP current less than the target electric submersible pump (ESP) current.

4. The method in accordance with claim 3 , further comprising changing the operating mode of the gas vent system from the gradient mode to a level mode by increasing the gas venting rate to decrease the downhole pressure (PDH).

5. The method in accordance with claim 2 , further comprising employing one or more control laws for a level mode of operation as a result of:

a calculated phase difference between oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) and oscillations in the target gas venting rate set point is more than a target phase difference;

a calculated gradient greater than the target gradient; or

a calculated ESP current greater than the target electric submersible pump (ESP) current.

6. The method in accordance with claim 1 , further comprising:

positioning a gas vent conduit within the wellbore, the gas vent conduit including a gas vent intake passage situated within the substantially horizontal portion of the wellbore; and

facilitating a first flow of gaseous substances through the gas vent conduit, wherein the first flow of gaseous substances through the gas vent conduit is controlled by the gas vent choke valve situated outside the wellbore.

7. The method in accordance with claim 6 , further comprising purging the gas vent conduit with a pressurized gas in response to a determination that a gas vent flow measurement is substantially zero or significantly decreases.

8. The method in accordance with claim 6 , further comprising:

positioning a gas probe conduit within the wellbore, the gas probe conduit including a gas probe intake passage within the substantially horizontal portion of the wellbore, wherein the gas probe intake passage is situated at a different location than the gas vent intake passage; and

facilitating a second flow of gaseous substances through the gas probe conduit.

9. The method in accordance with claim 8 , therein the gas probe conduit includes a diameter different from a diameter of gas vent conduit.

10. The method in accordance with claim 8 , wherein the gas vent conduit and the gas probe conduit are embedded within a casing of the wellbore.

11. The method in accordance with claim 8 , wherein the gas probe conduit is situated annularly inward from the gas vent conduit.

12. A method of controlling a gas vent system that includes a gas vent choke valve to vent gas from a wellbore that includes a substantially horizontal portion, the wellbore configured to channel a mixture of fluids, said method comprising:

determining an initial operating mode of the gas vent system by determining an initial target downhole pressure (PDH) set point, setting a gas venting rate to fluctuate above and below the initial target downhole pressure (PDH) set point and measuring and comparing a dynamic response of the downhole pressure (PDH) to the gas venting rate;

generating one or more control signals established for the determined initial operation mode; and

transmitting the one or more control signals to a gas vent choke valve that commands a closing or opening of the gas vent choke valve.

13. The method in accordance with claim 12 , wherein generating one or more control signals established for the determined initial operation mode comprises:

employing one or more control laws for a gradient mode of operation as a result of:

a calculated phase difference between oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) and oscillations in the target gas venting rate set point less than a target phase difference;

a calculated gradient less than the target gradient; or

a calculated ESP current less than the target electric submersible pump (ESP) current, or

employing one or more control laws for a level mode of operation as a result of:

a calculated phase difference between oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) and oscillations in the target gas venting rate set point is more than a target phase difference;

a calculated gradient greater than the target gradient; or

a calculated ESP current greater than the target electric submersible pump (ESP) current.

14. The method in accordance with claim 12 , wherein employing one or more control laws for a gradient mode of operation further comprises:

changing the operating mode of the gas vent system from the gradient mode to a level mode by increasing the gas venting rate to decrease the downhole pressure (PDH).

15. A controller for use in venting gas from a wellbore, the wellbore including a substantially horizontal portion, the wellbore configured to channel a mixture of fluids, said controller configured to:

determine an initial operating mode of a gas vent system by determining a downhole pressure (PDH) and a gas venting rate of the gas vent system;

generate one or more control signals established for the determined initial operation mode;

detect whether a periodic increase in the gas venting rate results in one of an increase or a decrease of the downhole pressure (PDH) by calculating and comparing one of:

calculating and comparing a phase difference in oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) with oscillations in the initial target venting rate set point calculating and comparing a gradient with a target gradient; or

calculating and comparing a measured current with a target electric submersible pump (ESP) current, and

employ one or more control laws for one of:

a gradient mode of operation as a result of one of a calculated phase difference between oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) and oscillations in the target gas venting rate set point less than a target phase difference, a calculated gradient less than the target gradient, or a calculated ESP current less than the target ESP current, or

a level mode of operation as a result of one of a calculated phase difference between oscillations in downhole pressure (PDH) and oscillations in the target gas venting rate set point is more than a target phase difference, a calculated gradient greater than the target gradient, or a calculated ESP current greater than the target ESP current; and

transmit the one or more control signals to a gas vent choke valve that commands a closing or opening of the gas vent choke valve.

16. The controller in accordance with claim 15 , wherein employing one or more control laws for a gradient mode of operation further comprises changing the operating mode of the gas vent system from the gradient mode to a level mode by increasing the gas venting rate to decrease the downhole pressure (PDH).

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2023
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063144/0844 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2020
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 051708/0186 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 16, 2020
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 051620/0304 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2017
From: SINGAL, KALPESH; ARAVIND, DEEPAK; VANDAM, JEREMY DANIEL; TUMMALA, YASHWANTH
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 041577/0932 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180266209A1 · Sep 20, 2018