IP Library Granted Patent US 10,924,874
Granted Patent B2
US 10,924,874 · App. 15/471,231 · Granted Feb 16, 2021

Systems and method for monitoring cinema loudspeakers and compensating for quality problems

Inventors: Brian John Bonnick (Oakville, CA); Denis G. Tremblay (Brampton, CA)
Assignee: IMAX Corporation
H04S7/301H04R3/04H04R27/00H04R29/002H04R29/007H04S3/002H04R29/001H04R2227/007
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,924,874
App. No.
15/471,231
Granted
Feb 16, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and processes for compensating for changes in a theatre sound system positioned in a theatre are described. A subsequent response of a loudspeaker to a test signal is captured and compared to a previously obtained signature response of the loudspeaker to the test signal. An audio signal can be processed based on the comparison to compensate for changes to loudspeaker performance, or otherwise.

Claims (41)

1. A method comprising:

capturing, by a microphone positioned at a secondary location in a theatre that includes an audience-seating area, a response to a test signal of a loudspeaker that has been tuned in the theatre, the secondary location being a location that is within an audio dispersion path of the loudspeaker and that is other than the audience-seating area to avoid interfering with a view of a visual presentation in the theatre for any patron positioned in the audience-seating area, the response having localized acoustical effects and being degraded as a result of the microphone being positioned at the secondary location;

treating the response as being what a desired response would be if the response was instead captured at a location that interfered with the view of the visual presentation by at least one patron positioned in the audience-seating area in the theatre;

storing the response;

subsequent to capturing the response, capturing, by the microphone positioned at the secondary location, a subsequent response of the loudspeaker to (a) the test signal; and

providing the subsequent response and the response that is treated as the desired response, for comparing the subsequent response to predetermined limits determined based on the response.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the secondary location is positioned along a wall in the theatre.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

tuning a theatre sound system that includes the loudspeaker prior to capturing the response to the test signal.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the test signal comprises an audio signal to which the response of the loudspeaker is in at least one frequency in a hearing range of a human.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein capturing, by the microphone positioned at the secondary location, the subsequent response of the loudspeaker to the test signal comprises capturing the test signal simultaneously with at least one person seated in the audience seating in the theatre.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the predetermined limits as offsets to the response;

comparing the subsequent response to the offsets to the response; and

outputting to a user interface a result of comparing the subsequent response to the offsets to the response.

7. A system comprising:

a microphone positionable at a secondary location in a theatre that includes an audience-seating area, the secondary location being a location that is within an audio dispersion path of a loudspeaker and that is other than the audience-seating area to avoid interfering with a view of a visual presentation in the theatre for any patron positioned in the audience-seating area, the microphone being configured to:

capture a response to a test signal of a loudspeaker that has been tuned in the theatre, the response having localized acoustical effects and being degraded as a result of the microphone being positioned at the secondary location; and

capture a subsequent response of the loudspeaker to (a) the test signal; and

an equalizer unit communicatively coupled to the microphone to treat the response as being what a desired response would be if the response was instead captured at a location that interfered with the view of the visual presentation by at least one patron positioned in the audience-seating area, the subsequent response and the response that is treated as the desired response being usable to compare the subsequent response to predetermined limits determined based on the response.

8. The system of claim 7 , further comprising:

a tuning computer having instructions that are executable to:

receive the response and the subsequent response from the equalizer unit; determine the predetermined limits as offsets to the response;

compare the subsequent response to the offsets to the response; and

output to a user interface a result of comparing the subsequent response to the offsets to the response.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the secondary location is along a wall in the theatre.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the test signal comprises an audio signal to which the response of the loudspeaker is in at least one frequency in a hearing range of a human.

11. The system of claim 7 , wherein the microphone is configured to capture the subsequent response of the loudspeaker to the test signal simultaneously with at least one person seated in the audience seating in the theatre.

12. A system comprising:

an equalizer unit configured for receiving responses of a loudspeaker to signals captured by a microphone positionable at a secondary location in a theatre that includes an audience-seating area, the secondary location being a location that is within an audio dispersion path of the loudspeaker and that is other than the audience-seating area to avoid interfering with a view of the one or more visual presentations in the theatre for any patron positioned in the audience-seating area, the responses having localized acoustical effects and including:

a first response by the loudspeaker in a tuned state to a test signal, the first response being a degraded response as compared to a desired response as a result of the position of the microphone in the secondary location; and

a second response by the loudspeaker to (a) the test signal provided to the loudspeaker subsequent in time to the equalizer unit receiving the first response, the equalizer unit being configured to store the first response as the desired response of the loudspeaker by having the response represent what the desired response would be if the response was instead captured at a location that interfered with the view of the one or more visual presentations by at least one patron positioned in the audience-seating area in the theatre,

wherein the equalizer unit is configured to output the response and the subsequent response for comparing the subsequent response to predetermined limits determined based on the response.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the secondary location is along a wall in the theatre.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the loudspeaker is configured to be in a tuned state by the theatre sound system that includes the loudspeaker being tuned prior to the response to the test signal being received.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the test signal comprises an audio signal to which the response of the loudspeaker is in at least one frequency in a hearing range of a human.

16. The system of claim 12 , further comprising the microphone that is configured to capture the test signal simultaneously with at least one person seated in the audience seating in the theatre.

17. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a tuning computer having instructions that are executable to:

receive the response and the subsequent response from the equalizer unit; determine the predetermined limits as offsets to the response;

compare the subsequent response to the offsets to the response; and

output to a user interface a result of comparing the subsequent response to the offsets to the response.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 29, 2022
From: IMAX CORPORATION
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 059771/0488 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 28, 2017
From: BONNICK, BRIAN JOHN; TREMBLAY, DENIS G.
To: IMAX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041763/0748 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 13388428
Provisional Application 61230833 · Aug 3, 2009
Related Publication 20170201845A1 · Jul 13, 2017