IP Library Patent Application 15477872
Patent Application
App. No. 15/477,872

PROCESSING A REQUEST SIGNAL REGARDING OPERATION OF AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/477,872
Abstract

Among other things, a vehicle drives autonomously on a trajectory through a road network to a goal location based on an automatic process for planning the trajectory without human intervention; and an automatic process alters the planning of the trajectory to reach a target location based on a request received from an occupant of the vehicle to engage in a speed-reducing maneuver.

Claims (44)

1 . A method comprising:

(a) causing a vehicle to drive autonomously on a road network,

(b) by a computer receiving a signal representing a request for an emergency stop or an identification of an emergency condition,

(b) by a computer analyzing the request or the emergency condition and data, to identify a target location for stopping, and

(c) causing the vehicle to move autonomously to and stop at the target location.

2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising receiving the signal from (a) an occupant, (b) a teleoperator, or (c) a software or hardware process that identifies the emergency condition.

3 . The method of claim 1 , in which receiving the signal comprises receiving at least some of the data from a user interface in the vehicle resulting from an interaction by an occupant of the vehicle.

4 . The method of claim 3 , in which the interface comprises a button, a switch, a pull-cord, a pedal, a pad, a sensor, a whistle, a display, or a voice assistant, or a combination of two or more of them.

5 . The method of claim 1 , in which receiving the signal comprises receiving a command from a teleoperator via telecommunications.

6 . The method of claim 1 , in which the signal is initiated by a software or hardware process based on degradation in performance of the vehicle.

7 . The method of claim 6 , in which the degradation in performance comprises degradation in performance of a sensor or a component of the vehicle.

8 . The method of claim 1 , in which the signal is initiated by detection of an event on the road network.

9 . The method of claim 1 , in which the data or the signal comprises a degree of urgency.

10 . The method of claim 9 , in which the degree of urgency has been indicated an initiator of the signal.

11 . The method of claim 9 , comprising inferring the degree of urgency by an algorithmic analysis on the signal.

12 . The method of claim 11 , in which the algorithmic analysis comprises analysis of a frequency, a volume, a sound, a voice, or a type, or two or more of them, of an oral request.

13 . The method of claim 1 , in which the data or the signal comprises an expected stopping time interval.

14 . The method of claim 13 , in which the expected stopping time interval is received from an initiator of the signal.

15 . The method of claim 13 , in which the expected stopping time interval is inferred by an algorithmic analysis on the signal.

16 . The method of claim 15 , in which the algorithmic analysis comprises analyzing the data.

17 . The method of claim 1 , in which the data comprises traffic data, sensor data, map data, or two or more of them.

18 . The method of claim 1 , in which analyzing the request comprises evaluating quality of one or more target locations.

19 . The method of claim 18 , in which the quality is evaluated offline relative to the vehicle.

20 . The method of claim 18 , in which the quality is evaluated online when the vehicle is driving.

21 . The method of claim 20 , in which evaluating the quality comprises computing a quality based on one or more of the following factors: the emergency condition, a location of the vehicle on the road network, a traffic speed, a traffic volume, a traffic composition, a lane choice, a blockage degree, a sightline from another vehicle, a distance from an intersection, presence of a dedicated lane, terrain, and a road slope.

22 . The method of claim 21 , in which one or more of the factors are represented by numerical values.

23 . The method of claim 22 , in which each of the numerical values is mapped to a pre-defined range.

24 . The method of claim 21 , in which the computing of the quality comprises assigning weights to one or more of the factors.

25 . The method of claim 24 , in which the weights are based on one or more of the following: features of the request, a type of the vehicle, a regulation, a degree of urgency, and an expected stopping time interval.

26 . The method of claim 21 , comprising ignoring a target location based on its quality value or information specifying its exclusion.

27 . The method of claim 21 , comprising classifying target locations in quality categories.

28 . The method of claim 1 , in which the analyzing comprises applying a minimum quality threshold to identify one or more acceptable target locations.

29 . The method of claim 28 , comprising computing the minimum quality threshold based on one or more of the following: a degree of urgency, an expected stopping time interval, and a conflicting rule.

30 . The method of claim 1 , in which analyzing the data comprises identifying a region for choosing a target location.

31 . The method of claim 30 , in which the region comprises a drivable area or a non-drivable area or both.

32 . The method of claim 30 , in which the region comprises an area faced by a forward-facing side of the vehicle.

33 . The method of claim 30 , in which the region comprises a shape or a size or both.

34 . The method of claim 33 , comprising determining the shape or the size based on a traffic condition or on a degree of urgency or on both.

35 . The method of claim 30 , comprising determining the region based on qualities of one or more target locations.

36 . The method of claim 30 , comprising expanding the region when no target location is identified.

37 . The method of claim 30 , comprising updating the region based on a new location of the vehicle.

38 . The method of claim 30 , in which choosing a target location comprises discretizing the region into potential target places.

39 . The method of claim 30 , in which choosing a target location comprises using availability data.

40 . The method of claim 39 , comprising acquiring the availability data from one or more of the following: a crowd-sourced database, a sensor, a perception process, a historical database, a parking lot database, a parking space database, the vehicle, and another vehicle.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2020
From: MOTIONAL AD INC.
To: MOTIONAL AD LLC
Reel/Frame 053961/0619 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 25, 2020
From: NUTONOMY INC.
To: MOTIONAL AD INC.
Reel/Frame 053892/0220 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE OF ALL THREE INVENTORS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 041850 FRAME 0032. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded May 3, 2017
From: RAVICHANDRAN, HARSHAVARDHAN; IAGNEMMA, KARL; WOLFF, ERIC
To: NUTONOMY INC.
Reel/Frame 042397/0862 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2017
From: RAVICHANDRAN, HARSHAVARDHAN; IAGNEMMA, KARL; WOLFF, ERIC
To: NUTONOMY INC.
Reel/Frame 041850/0032 →