Antenna control method and non-transitory computer-readable medium thereof

1. An antenna control method for controlling an antenna device to switch among a plurality of beams, comprising steps of:

(a) communicating by using the beams one after another, and performing a scanning process on each of the beams, so as to retrieve a communication quality parameter;

(b) comparing all of the communication quality parameters with each other, and selecting one of the beams having the best communication quality parameter as a main communication beam;

(c) performing a saturation determination process on the main communication beam; and

(d) switching to another beam adjacent to the main communication beam as a substitute communication beam responsive to determining that the main communication beam causes saturation of a power amplifier.

2. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the scanning process of the step (a) comprises:

measuring a plurality of communication sample values of the corresponding beam at intervals;

during a preset time period, continuously calculating a plurality of moving average values of the respective communication sample values;

averaging the moving average values of the respective communication sample values, so as to obtain a plurality of final average values corresponding to the respective communication sample values; and

using the final average values as the communication quality parameter of the corresponding beam.

3. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein each of the communication quality parameters comprises RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power), RSRQ (Reference Signal Received Quality), and SINR (Signal to Interference-plus-Noise Ratio).

4. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the step (b) further comprises:

comparing the RSRP of each of the communication quality parameters with a first threshold value;

responsive to determining that at least one RSRP of the communication quality parameters is not lower than the first threshold value, selecting one of the beams having the best RSRP as the main communication beam; and

responsive to determining that all of the RSRPs of the communication quality parameters are lower than the first threshold value, selecting one of the beams having the best RSRQ as the main communication beam.

5. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the saturation determination process of the step (c) comprises:

during a predetermined time period, measuring a plurality of communication sample values of the main communication beam at intervals;

continuously calculating a plurality of moving average values of the communication sample values;

averaging the moving average values, so as to obtain a final average value; and

using the final average value as a saturation condition parameter of the main communication beam.

6. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the saturation condition parameter comprises RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power), and SINR (Signal to Interference-plus-Noise Ratio).

7. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the saturation determination process of the step (c) further comprises:

comparing the RSRP of the saturation condition parameter with a second threshold value;

comparing the SINR of the saturation condition parameter with a third threshold value;

responsive to determining that the RSRP of the saturation condition parameter is higher than or equal to the second threshold value, and the SINR of the saturation condition parameter is lower than or equal to the third threshold value, determining that the main communication beam causes the saturation of the power amplifier; and

responsive to determining that the RSRP of the saturation condition parameter is lower than the second threshold value, or the SINR of the saturation condition parameter is higher than the third threshold value, determining that the main communication beam does not cause the saturation of the power amplifier.

8. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

(e) performing the saturation determination process and a strength determination process on the substitute communication beam.

9. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 8 , further comprising:

(f) responsive to determining that a quality measurement for the substitute communication beam is below a predetermined threshold, or causes the saturation of the power amplifier, using the main communication beam again, instead of using the substitute communication beam.

10. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 9 , wherein the saturation determination process and the strength determination process of the step (e) comprise:

during a predetermined time period, measuring a plurality of communication sample values of the substitute communication beam at intervals;

continuously calculating a plurality of moving average values of the communication sample values;

averaging the moving average values, so as to obtain a final average value; and

using the final average value as a saturation condition parameter and a strength condition parameter of the substitute communication beam.

11. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the saturation condition parameter and the strength condition parameter comprise RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power), and SINR (Signal to Interference-plus-Noise Ratio).

12. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the strength determination process of the step (e) comprises:

comparing the RSRP of the strength condition parameter with a fourth threshold value;

responsive to determining that the RSRP of the strength condition parameter is lower than the fourth threshold value, determining that the substitute communication beam is too weak; and

responsive to determining that the RSRP of the strength condition parameter is higher than or equal to the fourth threshold value, determining that the substitute communication beam has sufficient strength.

13. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the saturation determination process of the step (e) further comprises:

comparing the RSRP of the saturation condition parameter with a second threshold value;

comparing the SINR of the saturation condition parameter with a third threshold value;

responsive to determining that the RSRP of the saturation condition parameter is higher than or equal to the second threshold value, and the SINR of the saturation condition parameter is lower than or equal to the third threshold value, determining that the substitute communication beam causes the saturation of the power amplifier; and

responsive to determining that the RSRP of the saturation condition parameter is lower than the second threshold value, or the SINR of the saturation condition parameter is higher than the third threshold value, determining that the substitute communication beam does not cause the saturation of the power amplifier.

14. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 9 , further comprising:

(g) responsive to determining that the step (c), the step (d), the step (e), and the step (f) have been all completed, during a freezing time period, no switching is performed between the main communication beam and the substitute communication beam.

15. The antenna control method as claimed in claim 14 , further comprising:

(h) resetting and then performing the step (a), the step (b), the step (c), the step (d), the step (e), and the step (f) at intervals of a cycle time period.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a computer program product operable to control a communication device to perform operations of:

(a) using a plurality of beams of an antenna device for communication one after another, and performing a scanning process on each of the beams, so as to retrieve a communication quality parameter;

(b) comparing all of the communication quality parameters, and selecting one of the beams as a main communication beam, wherein the selected beam has the best communication quality parameter;

(c) performing a saturation determination process on the main communication beam; and

(d) switching to another beam adjacent to the main communication beam as a substitute communication beam responsive to determining that the main communication beam causes saturation of a power amplifier.