Alert notifications utilizing broadcasted telematics data
View Patent ↗Geographic location data and telematics data may be collected in real-time by a mobile device within a vehicle, or the vehicle itself. The telematics data may indicate vehicle direction, speed, motion, etc., as well as traffic hazards in the surrounding environment. A remote server may receive the location and telematics data from two vehicles. If an anomalous or hazardous condition exists in the vicinity of the first vehicle, a geographic relationship with the second vehicle is determined, and if within a predetermined distance, an alert or alternate route for the second vehicle is determined and transmitted to the second vehicle. As a result, a negative impact or risk of collision caused by the anomalous condition on the second vehicle is alleviated. The amount of the insured's usage of the telematics data-based risk mitigation or prevision functionality may be used to calculate or adjust insurance premiums, rates, or discounts.
1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
receiving, by one or more processors, (i) first data indicative of a geographic location of a first and a second vehicle, and (ii) second data indicative of a motion of the first and the second vehicle; and
in response to the one or more processors determining, based upon the first data and the second data, that (i) an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle, and (ii) a calculated geographic relationship between the first and the second vehicle satisfies a threshold distance condition, transmitting an alert indicative of the anomalous condition to a computing device associated with the second vehicle,
wherein the alert alleviates a risk of the second vehicle experiencing a physical vehicle collision as a result of the anomalous condition.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the act of receiving the first and the second data comprises:
receiving the first data from a first mobile computing device that is travelling within the first vehicle; and
receiving the second data from a second mobile computing device that is travelling within the second vehicle.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the second data includes data selected from one or more of, and not limited to all of:
a timestamp;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of braking motion of the first vehicle;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of acceleration motion of the first vehicle;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of cornering motion of the first vehicle; and
one or more sensor metrics indicative of a direction of the first vehicle.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the act of determining whether an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle comprises:
determining whether a speed of the first vehicle is less than a threshold speed.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
calculating, by one or more processors, a geofence around the first vehicle, and
wherein the calculated geographic relationship between the first and the second vehicle satisfies the threshold distance condition when the second vehicle is located within the geofence around the first vehicle.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
adjusting, by one or more processors, the threshold distance condition based upon a calculated population density corresponding to the geographic location of the first vehicle or the second vehicle.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the calculated geographic relationship between the first and the second vehicle satisfies the threshold distance condition when the second vehicle is located less than a threshold distance from the first vehicle.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing device associated with the second vehicle is a mobile computing device, the method further comprising:
identifying, by one or more processors, an insured customer associated with the mobile computing device; and
adjusting, by one or more processors, an insurance policy, premium, or discount for the insured customer based upon the mobile computing device being configured to receive transmitted alerts indicative of anomalous conditions.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing device associated with the second vehicle is a mobile computing device, the method further comprising:
identifying, by one or more processors, an insured customer associated with the mobile computing device;
monitoring, by one or more processors, a usage amount associated with the insured customer driving the second vehicle while the mobile computing device is configured to receive transmitted alerts indicative of anomalous conditions; and
adjusting, by one or more processors, an insurance policy, premium, or discount for the insured customer based upon the usage amount.
10. A non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium storing machine readable instructions for generating alerts that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:
receive (i) first data indicative of a geographic location of a first and a second vehicle, and (ii) second data indicative of a motion of the first and the second vehicle; and
in response to the one or more processors determining, based upon the first data and the second data, that (i) an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle, and (ii) a calculated geographic relationship between the first and the second vehicle satisfies a threshold distance condition, transmit an alert indicative of the anomalous condition to a computing device associated with the second vehicle,
wherein the alert warns a driver of the second vehicle of the anomalous condition to reduce a risk of the second vehicle experiencing a physical vehicle collision as a result of the anomalous condition.
11. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to receive the first and the second data include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
receive the first data from a first mobile computing device that is travelling within the first vehicle; and
receive the second data from a second mobile computing device that is travelling within the second vehicle.
12. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the second data includes data selected from one or more of, and not limited to all of:
a timestamp;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of braking motion of the first vehicle;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of acceleration motion of the first vehicle;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of cornering motion of the first vehicle;
one or more sensor metrics indicative of a direction of the first vehicle.
13. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to determine whether the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to determine whether a speed of the first vehicle is less than a threshold speed.
14. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , further including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
calculate a geofence around the first vehicle, and
wherein the instructions to generate the alert further include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to determine that the threshold distance condition is satisfied when the second vehicle is located within the geofence around the first vehicle.
15. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , further including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
adjust the threshold distance condition based upon a calculated population density corresponding to the geographic location of the first vehicle or the second vehicle.
16. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to generate the alert further include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to determine that the threshold distance condition is satisfied when the second vehicle is located less than a threshold distance from the first vehicle.
17. A first mobile computing device located within a first vehicle, comprising:
a communication unit configured to receive data from a second mobile computing device located within a second vehicle, the data being indicative of a geographic location of the second vehicle and a motion of the second vehicle; and
a processor configured to determine whether an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the second vehicle based upon the received data,
wherein the communication unit is further configured to generate an alert indicative of the anomalous condition in response to (i) the processor determining that the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the second vehicle, and (ii) a calculated geographic relationship between the first and second vehicle satisfying a threshold distance condition, and
wherein the alert warns a driver of the first vehicle of the anomalous condition to reduce a risk of the first vehicle experiencing a physical vehicle collision as a result of the anomalous condition.
18. The first mobile computing device of claim 17 , wherein the communication unit is further configured to receive the data via (i) peer-to-peer communications between the first mobile computing device and a second mobile computing device located within the second vehicle, or (ii) network communications between the first mobile computing device and the second mobile computing device.
19. The first mobile computing device of claim 17 , wherein the processor is further configured to adjust the threshold distance condition based upon a calculated population density corresponding to the geographic location of the first vehicle or the second vehicle.
20. The first mobile computing device of claim 17 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine whether the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the second vehicle based upon whether a speed of the second vehicle is less than a threshold speed.