IP Library Granted Patent US 12,216,110
Granted Patent B2
US 12,216,110 · App. 15/487,329 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Method and system of estimating a sequence of polymer units

Inventors: Stuart William Reid (Oxford, GB); Gavin Harper (Sonning, GB); Clive Gavin Brown (Cambridge, GB); James Anthony Clarke (Kidlington, GB); Andrew John Heron (Oxford, GB)
Assignee: Oxford Nanopore Technologies PLC
G01N33/48721C12Q1/6869G01N27/44791G01N33/483G06F17/18G06N7/01G16B30/00G16B30/10B82Y15/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,216,110
App. No.
15/487,329
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sequence of polymer units in a polymer ( 3 ), eg. DNA, is estimated from at least one series of measurements related to the polymer, eg. ion current as a function of translocation through a nanopore ( 1 ), wherein the value of each measurement is dependent on a k-mer being a group of k polymer units ( 4 ). A probabilistic model, especially a hidden Markov model (HMM), is provided, comprising, for a set of possible k-mers: transition weightings representing the chances of transitions from origin k-mers to destination k-mers; and emission weightings in respect of each k-mer that represent the chances of observing given values of measurements for that k-mer. The series of measurements is analysed using an analytical technique, eg. Viterbi decoding, that refers to the model and estimates at least one estimated sequence of polymer units in the polymer based on the likelihood predicted by the model of the series of measurements being produced by sequences of polymer units. In a further embodiment, different voltages are applied across the nanopore during translocation in order to improve the resolution of polymer units.

Claims (45)

1. A computer-implemented method of estimating a sequence of polymer units in a polymer, the method comprising:

controlling translocation of the polymer through a nanopore using an enzyme;

detecting, using a measurement circuit coupled to electrodes arranged on each side of the nanopore, a sequence of measurements of the polymer, each measurement being indicative of an ion current flowing through the nanopore during said translocation of the polymer through the nanopore;

using at least one processor, coupled to a memory, to perform:

accessing, in the memory, a probabilistic model comprising, for a set of possible k-mers, wherein a k-mer is a group of k polymer units where k is a positive integer:

transition weightings each representing a probability of transition from an origin k-mer to a destination k-mer immediately subsequent in a sequence representing the sequence of polymer units, and wherein, when k is greater than one, transitions to destination k-mers that have a sequence in which the first k-1 polymer units are the same as the last k-1 polymer units of associated origin k-mers have greater probabilities than other transitions; and

emission weightings each representing a probability of obtaining given values of ion current measurements for a respective k-mer of the set of possible k-mers;

determining likelihoods, for each ion current measurement in the detected sequence of measurements of the polymer, that the ion current measurement was produced by respective k-mers of the set of possible k-mers, by optimizing a sequence of states of the probabilistic model based on the detected sequence of ion current measurements, the transition weightings, and the emission weightings; and

determining an estimated sequence of polymer units in the polymer based on the likelihoods determined for each ion current measurement.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein optimizing the sequence of states of the probabilistic model comprises optimization via the Viterbi algorithm.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probabilistic model comprises a Hidden Markov Model (HMM).

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the polymer is a polynucleotide.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein translocation of the polynucleotide through the nanopore is assisted by an enzyme.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sequence of measurements comprises plural series of measurements each related to said polymer, wherein the value of each measurement is dependent on a k-mer; and

wherein determining at least one estimated sequence of polymer units involves treating the plural series of measurements as arranged in plural, respective dimensions.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein each series of measurements are measurements of a same region of the same polymer.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the plural series of measurements comprise a first series of measurements and a second series of measurements, wherein the first series of measurements are measurements of a first region of a polymer and the second series of measurements are measurements of a second region of a polymer that is related to said first region.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first region and the second region are related regions of the same polymer.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the related regions are complementary.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein providing the probabilistic model comprises accessing, using the at least one processor, the probabilistic model stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the nanopore is inserted into a biological membrane, and wherein detecting the sequence of measurements of the polymer comprises measuring a current across the membrane.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising operating a control circuit to supply a voltage to the electrodes during said translocation of the polymer through the nanopore.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the enzyme controls a rate of translocation of the polymer through the nanopore throughout said translocation.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transition weightings comprise k preferred transitions.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the estimated sequence of polymer units comprises determining an estimated sequence of k-mers and determining the estimated sequence of polymer units based on the estimated sequence of k-mers.

17. At least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions encoded thereon that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform a method of estimating a sequence of polymer units in a polymer, the method comprising:

controlling translocation of the polymer through a nanopore using an enzyme;

detecting, using a measurement circuit coupled to electrodes arranged on each side of the nanopore, a sequence of measurements of the polymer, each measurement being indicative of an ion current flowing through the nanopore during said translocation of the polymer through the nanopore;

using at least one processor, coupled to a memory, to perform:

accessing, in the memory, a probabilistic model comprising, for a set of possible k-mers, wherein a k-mer is a group of k polymer units where k is a positive integer:

transition weightings each representing a probability of transition from an origin k-mer to a destination k-mer immediately subsequent in a sequence representing the sequence of polymer units, and wherein, when k is greater than one, transitions to destination k-mers that have a sequence in which the first k-1 polymer units are the same as the last k-1 polymer units of associated origin k-mers have greater probabilities than other transitions; and

emission weightings each representing a probability of obtaining given values of ion current measurements for a respective k-mer of the set of possible k-mers;

determining likelihoods, for each ion current measurement in the detected sequence of measurements of the polymer, that the ion current measurement was produced by respective k-mers of the set of possible k-mers, by optimizing a sequence of states of the probabilistic model based on the detected sequence of ion current measurements, the transition weightings, and the emission weightings; and

determining an estimated sequence of polymer units in the polymer based on the likelihoods determined for each ion current measurement.

18. A system comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions encoded thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform a method of estimating a sequence of polymer units in a polymer, the method comprising:

controlling translocation of the polymer through a nanopore using an enzyme;

detecting, using a measurement circuit coupled to electrodes arranged on each side of the nanopore, a sequence of measurements of the polymer, each measurement being indicative of an ion current flowing through the nanopore during said translocation of the polymer through the nanopore;

using at least one processor, coupled to a memory, to perform:

accessing, in the memory, a probabilistic model comprising, for a set of possible k-mers, wherein a k-mer is a group of k polymer units where k is a positive integer:

transition weightings each representing a probability of transition from an origin k-mer to a destination k-mer immediately subsequent in a sequence representing the sequence of polymer units, and wherein, when k is greater than one, transitions to destination k-mers that have a sequence in which the first k-1 polymer units are the same as the last k-1 polymer units of associated origin k-mers have greater probabilities than other transitions; and

emission weightings each representing a probability of obtaining given values of ion current measurements for a respective k-mer of the set of possible k-mers;

determining likelihoods, for each ion current measurement in the detected sequence of measurements of the polymer, that the ion current measurement was produced by respective k-mers of the set of possible k-mers, by optimizing a sequence of states of the probabilistic model based on the detected sequence of ion current measurements, the transition weightings, and the emission weightings; and

determining an estimated sequence of polymer units in the polymer based on the likelihoods determined for each ion current measurement.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 14, 2022
From: OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Reel/Frame 058737/0664 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2017
From: REID, STUART WILLIAM; HARPER, GAVIN; BROWN, CLIVE GAVIN; CLARKE, JAMES ANTHONY; HERON, ANDREW JOHN
To: OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 043448/0020 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 14346549
Provisional Application 61617880 · Mar 30, 2012
Provisional Application 61538721 · Sep 23, 2011
Related Publication 20170219557A1 · Aug 3, 2017
References Cited (198)
US 5795782A · Church et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6128587A · Sjolander · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7625706B2 · Akeson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7731826B2 · Hibbs et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8324914B2 · Chen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8452546B1 · Lathrop · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9057102B2 · Turner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9121064B2 · Turner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9127313B2 · Brown et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9546400B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9556480B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9678056B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9738929B2 · Turner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10131943B2 · Reid et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10260093B2 · Geiser et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10689697B2 · Reid et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11085077B2 · Reid et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11401549B2 · Reid et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11921103B2 · Reid et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11959906B2 · Reid et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020197618A1 · Sampson · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030099951A1 · Akeson et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050159898A1 · Yasuda et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050202444A1 · Zhu · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050272923A1 · Zhang et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060019259A1 · Joyce · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060086626A1 · Joyce · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070161028A1 · Schwartz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080092760A1 · Helmstadter et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090035777A1 · Kokoris et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100331194A1 · Turner et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110121840A1 · Sanghera et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110124518A1 · Cantor · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110226623A1 · Timp et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120071330A1 · Kokoris et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120088235A1 · Kokoris et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120316075A1 · Buzby et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130071837A1 · Winters-Hilt · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130203610A1 · Meller et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140255918A1 · Olasagasti et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150057948A1 · Reid et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150152492A1 · Brown et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150152495A1 · Stava et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150344944A1 · Reid et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160162634A1 · Reid et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170091427A1 · Massingham · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170096703A1 · Dolan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170233804A1 · Reid et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190154655A1 · Reid et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190203286A1 · Reid et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190310242A1 · Reid et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210079460A1 · Reid et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220064724A1 · Reid et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 1351183A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
EP 1544310A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP H11178575A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002325581A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005257687A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006119140A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010524436A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010539966A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014531901A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2000079257A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002042496 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006028508A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007117832A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007137225A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008092760A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008102120A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008124107 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010053820A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010055307A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010109197 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2010122293 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011067559 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012021149A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012107778A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012109483A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012135658A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012138357A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012164270A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013014451A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013041878A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013057495A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013098561A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013098562A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013109970A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013121224A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013153359A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013159042A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013185137A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014013259A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014013260A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014013262A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014064443A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014064444A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014096830A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Thompson et al. (Nucleic Acids Research, 1994, vol. 22, N0. 22 4673-4680). [cited by examiner]
Edgar et al. (Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 1792-1797). [cited by examiner]
Kasianowicz et al. (Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008. 1:737-66). (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Churbanov et al. (BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8(Suppl 7):S14, pp. 1-15) (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
Polymer (Chapter 2: Polymerizer Module, Copyright 1997, pp. 1-14) (Year: 1997). [cited by examiner]
Panwar et al. (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18563-18570) (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Howorka et al. (Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2360-2384) (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Stanke et al. (Bioinformatics, 2003, pp. 1-17). (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
EP Communication pursuant to Rule 114(2) EPC for application No. 13706058.8 dated Oct. 19, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Alcock et al., Time-series Similarity Queries Employing a Feature-Based Approach. Proceedings of the 7th Hellenic Conference on Informatics (HCI '99); University of loannina, Greece, pp. 1-9, Aug. 26-29, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Altschul et al., Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. Oct. 5, 1990;215(3):403-10. [cited by applicant]
Altschul, A protein alignment scoring system sensitive at all evolutionary distances. J Mol Evol. Mar. 1993;36(3):290-300. [cited by applicant]
Ashkenasy et al., Recognizing a single base in an individual DNA strand: a step toward DNA sequencing in nanopores. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Feb. 18, 2005;44(9):1401-4. [cited by applicant]
Batzoglou, Algorithmic challenges in mammalian whole-genome sequence assembly. In: Encyclopedia of genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Bell et al., DNA origami nanopores. Nano Lett. Jan. 11, 2012;12(1):512-7. doi: 10.1021/nl204098n. Epub Dec. 29, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Bokhari et al., A parallel graph decomposition algorithm for DNA sequencing with nanopores. Bioinformatics. Apr. 1, 2005;21(7):889-96. Epub Nov. 11, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Boufounos et al., Basecalling using hidden Markov models. Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 341 :23-36 (2004). [cited by applicant]
Braha et al., Designed protein pores as components for biosensors. Chem Biol. Jul. 1997;4(7):497-505. [cited by applicant]
Butler et al., Single-molecule DNA detection with an engineered MspA protein nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 30, 2008;105(52):20647-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807514106. Epub Dec. 19, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Clarke et al., Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat Nanotechnol. Apr. 2009;4(4):265-70. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.12. Epub Feb. 22, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Dahl et al., Direct observation of translocation in individual DNA polymerase complexes. J Biol Chem. Apr. 13, 2012;287(16):13407-21. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.338418. Epub Feb. 2, 20129. [cited by applicant]
Derrington et al., Nanopore DNA sequencing with MspA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 14, 2010;107(37):16060-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 1001831107. [cited by applicant]
Devereux et al., A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. Jan. 11, 1984;12(1 Pt 1):387-95. [cited by applicant]
Ervin et al., Simultaneous alternating and direct current readout of protein ion channel blocking events using glass nanopore membranes. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2008;80(6):2069-76. doi: 10.1021/ac7021103. Epub Feb. 23, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Fariselli et al., A new decoding algorithm for hidden Markov models improves the prediction of the topology of all-beta membrane proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. Dec. 1, 2005;6 Suppl 4:S12. [cited by applicant]
Gonzalez-Perez et al., Biomimetic triblock copolymer membrane arrays: a stable template for functional membrane proteins. Langmuir. Sep. 15, 2009;25(18):10447-50. doi: 10.1021/la902417m. [cited by applicant]
Gordon, Classification. 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC. 69-109. 1999. [cited by applicant]
Hall et al., Hybrid pore formation by directed insertion of α-haemolysin into solid-state nanopores. Nat Nanotechnol. Dec. 2010;5(12):874-7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.237. Epub Nov. 28, 2010. [cited by applicant]
He et al., Controlling DNA translocation through gate modulation of nanopore wall surface charges. ACS Nano. Jul. 26, 2011;5(7):5509-18. doi: 10.1021/nn201883b. Epub Jun. 17, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Healy, Nanopore-based single-molecule DNA analysis. Nanomedicine (Lond). Aug. 2007;2(4):459-81. [cited by applicant]
Heron et al., Simultaneous measurement of ionic current and fluorescence from single protein pores. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 11, 2009;131(5):1652-3. doi: 10.1021/ja808128s. [cited by applicant]
Higgins et al., CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene. Dec. 15, 1988;73(1):237-44. [cited by applicant]
Ivanov et al., DNA tunneling detector embedded in a nanopore. Nano Lett. Jan. 12, 2011;11(1):279-85. doi: 10.1021/nl103873a. Epub Dec. 6, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Karp et al., “Efficient randomized pattern-matching algorithms,” IBM J. Res. Development, vol. 31 (2), pp. 249-260 ( 1987). [cited by applicant]
Kasianowicz et al., Nanoscopic porous sensors. Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif). 2008;1:737-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112818. [cited by applicant]
Kowalczyk et al., Slowing down DNA translocation through a nanopore in lithium chloride. Nano Lett. Feb. 8, 2012;12(2):1038-44. doi: 10.1021/nl204273h. Epub Jan. 27, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Lathrop et al., Monitoring the escape of DNA from a nanopore using an alternating current signal. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 17, 2010;132(6):1878-85. doi: 10.1021/ja906951g. [cited by applicant]
Liang et al., Bayesian Basecalling for DNA Sequence Analysis using Hidden Markov Models. Proceedings of 2006 IEEE Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS, pp. 1599-1604 (2006). [cited by applicant]
Lieberman et al., Processive replication of single DNA molecules in a nanopore catalyzed by phi29 DNA polymerase. J Am Chem Soc. Dec. 22, 2010;132(50):17961-72. doi:10.1021/ja1087612. Epub Dec. 1, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Luan et al., Base-by-base ratcheting of single stranded DNA through a solid-state nanopore. Phys Rev Lett. Jun. 11, 2010;104(23):238103. Epub Jun. 10, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Luan et al., Control and reversal of the electrophoretic force on DNA in a charged nanopore. J Phys Condens Matter. Nov. 17, 2010;22(45):454123. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/45/454,123. Epub Oct. 29, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Manrao et al., Reading DNA at single-nucleotide resolution with a mutant MspA nanopore and phi29 DNA polymerase. Nat Biotechnol. Mar. 25, 2012;30(4):349-53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2171. [cited by applicant]
Montal et al., Formation of bimolecular membranes from lipid monolayers and a study of their electrical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Dec. 1972;69(12):3561-6. [cited by applicant]
Olasagasti et al., Replication of individual DNA molecules under electronic control using a protein nanopore. Nat Nanotechnol. Nov. 2010;5(11):798-806. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.177. Epub Sep. 26, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Quinlan et al., C.45: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, ISBN 1-55860-238-0. Ed.:Langley. 1-114. 1993. [cited by applicant]
Soni et al., Synchronous optical and electrical detection of biomolecules traversing through solid-state nanopores. Rev Sci Instrum. Jan. 2010;81(1):014301. doi: 10.1063/1.3277116. [cited by applicant]
Stoddart et al., Multiple base-recognition sites in a biological nanopore: two heads are better than one. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(3):556-9. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905483. [cited by applicant]
Stoddart et al., Nucleobase recognition in ssDNA at the central constriction of the alpha-hemolysin pore. Nano Lett. Sep. 8, 2010;10(9):3633-7. doi: 10.1021/nl101955a. [cited by applicant]
Stoddart et al., Single-nucleotide discrimination in immobilized DNA oligonucleotides with a biological nanopore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 12, 2009;106(19):7702-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901054106. Epub Apr. 20, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Suzuki et al., A New Hmnet Construction Algorithm Requiring No Contextual Factors. IEICE. Jun. 1995;E78:662-668. [cited by applicant]
Timp et al., DNA base-calling from a nanopore using a Viterbi algorithm. Biophys J. May 16, 2012;102(10):L37-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.04.009. Epub May 15, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Warren et al., Assembling millions of short DNA sequences using SSAKE. Bioinformatics. Feb. 15, 2007;23(4):500-1. Epub Dec. 8, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Winters-Hilt et al., A novel, fast, HMM-with-Duration implementation -for application with a new, pattern recognition informed, nanopore detector. BMC Bioinformatics. Nov. 1, 2007;8 Suppl 7:S19. [cited by applicant]
Winters-Hilt et al., Highly accurate classification of Watson-Crick basepairs on termini of single DNA molecules. Biophys J. Feb. 2003;84(2 Pt 1):967-76. [cited by applicant]
Zerbino et al., Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. May 2008;18(5):821-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. Epub Mar. 18, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., Bayesian adaptive sequence alignment algorithms. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(1):25-39. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-01353-LPS Document 15. Plaintiff's response to Oxford Nanopore Techologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Request for Scheduling Conference. Nov. 30, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-01353-LPS Document 13. First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. Nov. 30, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-01353-RGA Document 10. Oxford's opening brief in support of its motion to partially dismiss Pacbio's complaint for patent infringement. Nov. 16, 2017. [cited by applicant]
United States District Court for the District of Delaware Order. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-LPS Document 19. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-LPS Document 18. Notice of subsequent events relating to Oxford's motion to dismiss (D.I. 9). Oct. 18, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-RGA Document 16. Oxford's reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss PacBio's complaint for patent infringement. Jun. 26, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-RGA Document 14. PacBio's response to Oxford's motion to dismiss. Jun. 5, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Case 1:17-cv-00275-RGA Document 10. Oxford's opening brief in support of its motion to dismiss PacBio's complaint for patent infringement. May 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/162,848, filed Oct. 17, 2018, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
Khreich et al., A survey of techniques for incremental learning of HMM parameters. J Info Sciences. Aug. 2012; 197:105-130. [cited by applicant]
Winters-Hilt, Machine learning methods for channel current cheminformatics, biophysical analysis, and bioinformatics. University of California Santa Cruz. Mar. 2003. Dissertation. 176 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chao et al., Constrained sequence alignment. Bull Math Biol. May 1993;55(3):503-24. [cited by applicant]
Hein et al., Statistical alignment: computational properties, homology testing and goodness-of-fit. J Mol Biol. Sep. 8, 2000;302(1):265-79. [cited by applicant]
Kaxiras et al. Multiscale simulations of complex systems: computation meets reality. Sci Model Simul. 2008; 15:59-65. [cited by applicant]
Kent, Blat—the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. Apr. 2002;12(4):656-64. [cited by applicant]
Lam et al., HMMCONVERTER 1.0: a toolbox for hidden Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. Nov. 2009;37(21):e139. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp662. [cited by applicant]
Nakane et al. Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 (2003) R1365-R1393. [cited by applicant]
Schneider et al., DNA sequencing with nanopores. Nat Biotechnol. Apr. 10, 2012;30(4):326-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2181. [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al., PyroHMMvar: a sensitive and accurate method to call short indels and SNPs for Ion Torrent and 454 data. Bioinformatics. Nov. 15, 2013;29(22):2859-68. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt512. Epub Aug. 31, 2013. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office. [cited by applicant]
Jain et al., Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer. Nat Methods. Apr. 2015; 12(4): 351-356. EPub Feb. 16, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3290. Author Manuscript. [cited by applicant]
Loose et al., Real-time selective sequencing using nanopore technology. Nat Methods. Sep. 2016; 13(9): 751-754. EPub Jul. 25, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3930. [cited by applicant]
Mikheyev et al., A first look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. Mol Ecol Resour. Nov. 2014;14(6):1097-102. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12324. Epub Sep. 24, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Ainsleigh et al., Hidden Gauss-Markov Models for Signal Classification. IEEE Trans Sig Proc. Jun. 2002;50(6):1355-1367. [cited by applicant]
Bates et al., Dynamics of DNA molecules in a membrane channel probed by active control techniques. Biophys J. 2003;84(4):2366-2372. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75042-5. [cited by applicant]
Pylkkönen et al., Duration Modeling Techniques for Continuous Speech Recognition. Eighth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 2004. 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/930,198, filed May 12, 2020, Reid et al.. [cited by applicant]
Branton et al., The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2008;26(10):1146-53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1495. [cited by applicant]
Cabello-Aguilar et al., Experimental and simulation studies of unusual current blockade induced by translocation of small oxidized PEG through a single nanopore. Phys Chem Chem Phys. Sep. 7, 2014;16(33):17883-92. doi: 1… [cited by applicant]
Chu et al., Real-time monitoring of DNA polymerase function and stepwise single-nucleotide DNA strand translocation through a protein nanopore. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Dec. 27, 2010;49(52):10106-9. doi: 10.1002/anie.201… [cited by applicant]
Fennouri et al., Single molecule detection of glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides and depolymerization enzyme activity using a protein nanopore. ACS Nano. Nov. 27, 2012;6(11):9672-8. doi: 10.1021/nn303104… [cited by applicant]
Hornblower et al., Single-molecule analysis of DNA-protein complexes using nanopores. Nat Methods. Apr. 2007;4(4):315-7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1021. Epub Mar. 4, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Muzard et al., DNA translocation and unzipping through a nanopore: some geometrical effects. Biophys J. May 19, 2010;98(10):2170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.041. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/369,834, filed Jul. 7, 2021, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/449,272, filed Jun. 21, 2019, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/245,306, filed Jan. 11, 2019, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/311,272, filed Nov. 15, 2016, Massingham. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/852,192, filed Jun. 28, 2022, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 14/379,242, filed Aug. 15, 2014, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
PCT/GB2012/052343, Apr. 3, 2014, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. [cited by applicant]
PCT/GB2012/052343, Jan. 31, 2013, International Search Report. [cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/591,644, filed Feb. 29, 2024, Reid et al. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (3)
US 12,486,534 US 12,545,955 US 12,545,956