IP Library Granted Patent US 12,413,262
Granted Patent B2
US 12,413,262 · App. 15/527,123 · Granted Sep 9, 2025

Link loss detection

Inventors: Raj Kumar Jain (Bangalore, IN); Ravindra Singh (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: MaxLinear, Inc.
H04B3/46H03M13/1105H04B3/32H04L1/0061H04L1/0057H04L1/006H04M11/062
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,413,262
App. No.
15/527,123
Granted
Sep 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A coded signal is received via a physical link and decoded. A link loss of the physical link is detected based on at least one of the coded signal and said decoding.

Claims (69)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving a coded signal via a physical link,

decoding the received coded signal to obtain a result signal,

detecting a link loss of a disturber physical link based on the coded signal, the decoding of the coded signal, or both, wherein an error correction code is determined to combat noise related to the disturber physical link, wherein an action is to be taken responsive to the link loss of the disturber physical link that includes a mitigation of an effect related to the link loss of the disturber physical link, the link loss being further determined based on energy across a plurality of samples in a frequency domain.

2. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the link loss of the physical link is detected based on a temporal evolution of the at least one of the coded signal and/or the decoding in a time interval having a duration in the range of 3-15 ms.

3. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the decoding of the coded signal,

wherein the decoding provides an error signal indicative of a presence of errors in the coded signal,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the error signal.

4. The method of claim 3 ,

wherein the error signal is indicative of a number of adjacent erroneous symbols in the coded signal,

wherein the method further comprises:

executing a threshold comparison between the number of adjacent erroneous symbols and a predefined threshold,

wherein the link loss is selectively detected based on a result of the threshold comparison.

5. The method of claim 3 ,

wherein the decoding of the coded signal comprises decoding using a second-stage redundancy decoder operating based on the error signal.

6. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the decoding of the coded signal comprises decoding using a Viterbi decoder.

7. The method of claim 6 ,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the decoding of the coded signal,

wherein the decoding provides an error signal indicative of a presence of errors in the coded signal,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the error signal,

wherein the method further comprises

determining the error signal based on a difference between different Viterbi paths of the Viterbi decoder.

8. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the decoding of the coded signal comprises decoding using a Quadrature Amplitude Modulation, QAM, decoder.

9. The method of claim 8 ,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the decoding of the coded signal,

wherein the decoding provides an error signal indicative of a presence of errors in the coded signal,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the error signal,

wherein the method further comprises:

determining the error signal based on an Euclidean distance between a constellation point of a symbol of the coded signal and a constellation point of a predefined carrier.

10. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the decoding of the coded signal comprises decoding using a low-density parity check, LDPC, decoder.

11. The method of claim 10 ,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the decoding of the coded signal,

wherein the decoding provides an error signal indicative of a presence of errors in the coded signal,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the error signal,

wherein the method further comprises

determining the error signal based on a log-likelihood estimate between a constellation point of a symbol of the coded signal and a constellation point of a predefined carrier.

12. The method claim 1 ,

wherein the coded signal is modulated using at least one carrier,

wherein the link loss is detected based on the coded signal,

wherein the method further comprises:

measuring energy levels of a plurality of resource blocks of the coded signal,

wherein the link loss is determined based on the measured energy levels.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

executing a threshold comparison between energy levels of the plurality of resource blocks and a predetermined threshold,

wherein the link loss is selectively determined based on a result of the threshold comparison.

14. The method of claim 12 ,

wherein the coded signal is modulated using a plurality of carriers,

wherein the plurality of resources blocks are adjacent time samples of the coded signal or adjacent carriers of the coded signal.

15. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the result signal comprises a sequence of bits forming transmission frames,

wherein the link loss of the physical link is further detected based on a checksum of at least one of the transmission frames.

16. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the physical link comprises a copper wire,

wherein the method further comprises:

in response to determining the link loss of the physical link, removing a Digital Subscriber Line channel implemented via the physical link from a Digital Subscriber Line vector engine calculation, the Digital Subscriber Line vector engine calculation removing far-end crosstalk between the physical link and a plurality of further physical links.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

retaining further Digital Subscriber Line channels implemented via the further physical links at the Digital Subscriber Line vector engine calculation.

18. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the link loss corresponds to the physical link being interrupted and prohibiting communication.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the action to be taken responsive to the link loss of the disturber physical link includes an action for a second physical link that is affected by the link loss of the disturber physical link.

20. A device, comprising:

a receiver configured to receive a coded signal via a physical link, the coded signal having been coded by a Trellis coded modulation (TCM) encoder,

a decoder configured to decode the received coded signal to obtain a result signal,

at least one processor configured to detect a link loss of a disturber physical link based on the coded signal, the decoding of the coded signal, or both, wherein an error correction code is determined to combat noise related to the disturber physical link, wherein an action is to be taken responsive to the link loss of the disturber physical link that includes a mitigation of an effect related to the link loss of the disturber physical link, the link loss being further determined based on energy across a plurality of samples in a frequency domain.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 9, 2021
From: MAXLINEAR, INC.; MAXLINEAR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; EXAR CORPORATION
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 056816/0089 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2020
From: INTEL CORPORATION
To: MAXLINEAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 053626/0636 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2020
From: LANTIQ BETEILIGUNGS-GMBH & CO. KG
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 053259/0678 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2017
From: JAIN, RAJ KUMAR; SINGH, RAVINDRA
To: LANTIQ BETEILIGUNGS-GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 042836/0978 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62081592 · Nov 19, 2014
Related Publication 20190058503A1 · Feb 21, 2019
References Cited (69)
US 7212492B1 · Au · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7248587B1 · Sharma · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7743313B2 · Jain et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7860981B1 · Vinokour · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7970966B1 · Hobbs · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8081560B2 · Van Wijngaarden · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8306097B2 · De Lind Van Wijngaarden et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8683095B1 · Ni · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8717863B2 · Schenk · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20050047498A1 · Gao · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050166124A1 · Tsuchinaga · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050180336A1 · Kim · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050220180A1 · Barlev · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060067412A1 · Qiu · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060193396A1 · Li · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070030889A1 · Yu · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070091916A1 · Yu · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070157065A1 · Pons · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070260965A1 · Schmidt · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070280339A1 · Oksman · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080065968A1 · Jain · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080107089A1 · Larsson · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080176517A1 · Lee · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080298444A1 · Cioffi · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090083234A1 · Yeom · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090213916A1 · Liu · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090274242A1 · Kwon · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090313530A1 · Becker · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100117904A1 · Miyatani · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100185791A1 · Pons · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110110402A1 · Schenk · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110200080A1 · Fang · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120224470A1 · Jeong · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120243404A1 · Goodson · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120263060A1 · Suzuki · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130070826A1 · Nielsen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130130737A1 · Kobayashi · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130177306A1 · Pfau · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130229905A1 · Schenk · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140023127A1 · Pereira · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140055776A1 · Hathorn · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140089770A1 · Wei · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140098705A1 · Chow · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140143578A1 · Cenizal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140314134A1 · Dardenne · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140359381A1 · Takeuchi · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150046775A1 · Prodan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150063551A1 · Kuipers · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150085634A1 · Yu · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150110205A1 · Jin · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150138972A1 · Peeters · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150309852A1 · Urban · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160037128A1 · Van der Auwera · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160056989A1 · Murakami · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160084895A1 · Imhof · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160156383A1 · Nuzman · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160277564A1 · Rohlfing · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170134569A1 · Tu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170250731A1 · Medeiros · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 101163054A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 101369964A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 1130918A2 · 2001 [cited by examiner]
WO WO1993014572A1 · 1993 [cited by examiner]
WO 2009148530 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009148530A2 · 2009 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2014062704A1 · 2014 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016079180A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for PCT/EP2015/076965, Dated Feb. 8, 2016. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2015/076965, mailed Jun. 1, 2017, 8 Pages. [cited by applicant]