IP Library Granted Patent US 10,451,894
Granted Patent B2
US 10,451,894 · App. 15/536,864 · Granted Oct 22, 2019

Method for comparing a first ophthalmic lens with a second ophthalmic lens

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,451,894
App. No.
15/536,864
Granted
Oct 22, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a method for comparing first and second ophthalmic lenses, including: a first optical function providing step, during which a first optical function of a first ophthalmic lens LI is provided, the first optical function including at least a first set of values of an optical parameter Gj, the values of the first set of values corresponding to the values of the optical parameter of the first ophthalmic lens in a set of gaze directions, a similar second optical function providing step directed to a second ophthalmic lens L 2, a subsets determining step, during which at least a first and a second subset of gaze directions are selected, a comparison step for each subset of gaze directions, an assignment step, during which a subset status is assigned to each subset of gaze directions, the subset status being selected among at least three levels.

Claims (29)

1. A method, implemented by a computer configured to compare a first ophthalmic lens with a second ophthalmic lens, the method comprising:

providing a first optical function of a first ophthalmic lens, the first optical function comprising at least a first set of values of an optical parameter of the first ophthalmic lens in a set of gaze directions;

providing a second optical function of a second ophthalmic lens, the second optical function comprising at least a second set of values of the optical parameter of the second ophthalmic lens in the set of gaze directions;

selecting at least a first subset and a second subset of gaze directions within the set of gaze directions, each subset of gaze directions comprising at least two gaze directions specific only to said subset;

for each subset of gaze directions, comparing the values of the optical parameter of the first and second optical functions to each other using a comparison function associated with said optical parameter; and

assigning a subset status to each subset of gaze directions, the subset status being based on a comparison of the value of the comparison function with at least two threshold values associated with said optical parameter, the subset status being selected among at least three levels.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optical parameter is selected from one of a wearer power, oblique astigmatism, an unwanted astigmatism, distortion, magnification, prismatic deviation, and acuity loss.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second optical functions are wearer optical functions defined in specific wearing conditions, and the gaze directions are defined from the center of rotation of the eye of the wearer.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second optical functions are wearer optical functions defined in specific wearing conditions, and the optical parameter is a binocular optical parameter.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least first and second subsets of gaze directions comprise no common gaze directions.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the comparison function is a monotonically increasing function of the difference between the first and second optical functions.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein during the comparing, for each subset of gaze directions, the value of the optical parameter of the first and second optical function are compared using:

Ccomp=Ceval[|Pj (( αi, βi ); L 1)− Pj (( αi, βi ) ; L 2)|],  a.

or

Ccomp=Ceval[Pj (( αi,βi ); L 1)]−Ceval [Pj((αi, βi); L 2)]|,  b.

wherein Pj is the optical parameter, αi, βi is the set of gaze directions, L 1 is the first ophthalmic lens, and L 2 is the second ophthalmic lens, and

wherein Ceval is selected from the standard deviation function, the mean function, the peak to valley function, the maximum function, and the Root Mean Square function.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first and second lenses are configured to be worn by a wearer.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein each of the first and second lenses are virtual lenses.

10. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising assigning a global status for the set of gaze directions, the global status being dependent on each of the subset statuses according to a predetermined rule.

11. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising providing a frame contour, each of the subsets of gaze directions being comprised within the frame contour.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one subset of gaze direction comprises gaze directions in the vicinity of a central vision zone.

13. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first and second ophthalmic lenses are progressive addition lenses, and at least one subset of gaze directions comprises gaze directions in the vicinity of the meridian line.

14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein each of the gaze directions of the set is associated to one subset of gaze directions.

15. A lens ordering system comprising:

a processor configured to implement the comparing method according to claim 1 ; and

a display configured to display the comparison result.

16. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the first and second optical functions are wearer optical functions defined in specific wearing conditions, and the gaze directions are defined from the center of rotation of the eye of the wearer.

17. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the first and second optical functions are wearer optical functions defined in specific wearing conditions, and the optical parameter is a binocular optical parameter.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2018
From: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE D'OPTIQUE)
To: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL
Reel/Frame 045853/0275 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 11, 2017
From: CALIXTE, LAURENT; KARIOTY, FARID; FROELIGER, MARIE-GAELLE; GOULARD, CEDRIC; CONTET, AUDE; DOUCIN, BRUNO; FERRE, FANNY
To: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GENERALE D'OPTIQUE)
Reel/Frame 043265/0977 →