IP Library Granted Patent US 10,362,502
Granted Patent B2
US 10,362,502 · App. 15/537,428 · Granted Jul 23, 2019

Method for analysing a wireless link of a Wi-Fi node, respective circuit performing the method, and application

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,362,502
App. No.
15/537,428
Granted
Jul 23, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for analyzing a wireless link ( 3 ) of a wireless node of a customer premises equipment (CPE) device ( 1 ) during operation of the CPE device comprises: performing an active test, during which a data transmission is forced through the wireless link, to obtain a first set of parameters, and performing before or after the active test a passive test, which is a monitoring mode during which a data transmission of the CPE device is monitored, to obtain a second set of parameters. In particular, based on the first set of parameters, it is determined whether and to which extent the wireless link is in an uncertainty zone, and based on the second set of parameters, the decision is made to assign an observed decrease in a measured data rate to physics effects or to interference effects.

Claims (29)

1. A method for analyzing a wireless link of a wireless node of a customer premises equipment (CPE) device, comprising:

performing a first test, during which a data transmission is forced through the wireless link, to obtain a first set of parameters comprising at least a measured data rate with a RSSI value and

performing a second test, which is a monitoring mode during which a data transmission of the wireless link is monitored, to obtain a second set of parameters,

wherein if the measured data rate with the RSSI value is an uncertainty zone of a reference data, said reference data comprising two sets of data rates with RSSI values measured at two different times in an interference free environment and for two different conditions of path loss, an observed decrease in the measured data rate is assigned to Physics effects or to a Far End Interference based on the second set of parameters.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the wireless link is fully loaded during the first test, and the decision to assign the observed decrease in the measured data rate to Physics effects or to Far End Interference is made with reference to measured RSSI values as included in the second set of parameters.

3. The method according to claim 1 , comprising

taking samples of one or several of the following parameters in a time interval: Received Signal Strength (RSSI), modulation rate (Physical Layer Rate) and/or the number of spatial streams used for the wireless link during the second test, and

calculating an average for said parameters over a test interval by including a filtering of said parameters to avoid artefacts caused by power save mechanisms.

4. The method of claim 3 , comprising: sample a transmission rate (TxRate) and receive rate (RxRate) in said time interval to calculate the traffic flowing over the link, and retaining only those parameter values, Received Signal Strength, modulation rate and/or the number of spatial streams, for calculating the average, that are taken at a moment when sufficient traffic is flowing over the link.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the average parameters are used for calculating a maximum possible data rate for the wireless link.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein a maximum obtainable wireless data rate is determined by determining a data throughput from said reference data for a given measured received signal strength (RSSI) and by taking into account a correction factor for the number of multiple spatial streams for a selected wireless standard used for the transmission.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the number of multiple spatial streams is determined by checking a Rx and/or TX physical rate at an access point side or station side.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein a correction factor is determined to distinguish between environment and interference by taking into account the number of spatial streams used for an access point to station link in comparison with the number of spatial streams for a station to access point link.

9. A device comprising a processor, a memory and a wireless node said processor being configured to perform:

a first test, during which a data transmission is forced through the wireless link, to obtain a first set of parameters comprising at least a measured data rate with a RSSI value, and

a second test, which is a monitoring mode during which a data transmission of the wireless link is monitored, to obtain a second set of parameters

wherein if the measured data rate with the RSSI value is an uncertainty zone of a reference data, said reference data comprising two sets of data rates with RSSI values measured at two different times in an interference free environment and for two different conditions of path loss, an observed decrease in the measured data rate is assigned to Physics effects or to a Far End Interference based on the second set of parameters.

10. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the wireless link is fully loaded during the first test, and the decision to assign an observed decrease in the measured data rate to Physics effects or to Far End Interference is made with reference to measured RSSI values as included in the second set of parameters.

11. The device of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to

take samples of one or several of the following parameters in a time interval: Received Signal Strength (RSSI), modulation rate (Physical Layer Rate) and/or the number of spatial streams used for the wireless link during the second test, and

calculate an average for said parameters over a test interval by including a filtering of said parameters to avoid artefacts caused by power save mechanisms.

12. The device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to sample a transmission rate (TxRate) and receive rate (RxRate) in said time interval to calculate the traffic flowing over the link, and to retain only those parameter values, Received Signal Strength, modulation rate and/or the number of spatial streams, for calculating the average, that are taken at a moment when sufficient traffic is flowing over the link.

13. The device of claim 11 , wherein the average parameters are used for calculating a maximum possible data rate for the wireless link.

14. The device of claim 9 , wherein a maximum obtainable wireless data rate is determined by determining a data throughput from said reference data for a given measured received signal strength (RSSI) and by taking into account a correction factor for the number of multiple spatial streams for a selected wireless standard used for the transmission.

15. The device of claim 14 , wherein the number of multiple spatial streams is determined by checking a Rx and/or TX physical rate at an access point side or station side.

16. A non-transitory program storage medium, readable by a computer and comprising executable program code for performing a method for analyzing a wireless link of a wireless node of a customer premises equipment (CPE) device, comprising:

performing a first test, during which a data transmission is forced through the wireless link, to obtain a first set of parameters comprising at least a measured data rate with a RSSI value and

performing a second test, which is a monitoring mode during which a data transmission of the wireless link is monitored, to obtain a second set of parameters,

wherein if the measured data rate with the RSSI value is an uncertainty zone of a reference data, said reference data comprising two sets of data rates with RSSI values measured at two different times in an interference free environment and for two different conditions of path loss, an observed decrease in the measured data rate is assigned to Physics effects or to a Far End Interference based on the second set of parameters.

Assignments (5)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY NAME FROM INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS TO INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS, SAS. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 47332 FRAME: 511. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 28, 2024
From: THOMSON LICENSING
To: INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS, SAS
Reel/Frame 066703/0509 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 18, 2019
From: INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS, SAS
To: TECHNICOLOR DELIVERY TECHNOLOGIES SAS
Reel/Frame 048930/0404 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 18, 2019
From: TECHNICOLOR DELIVERY TECHNOLOGIES SAS
To: AIRTIES BELGIUM SPRL
Reel/Frame 048930/0451 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2018
From: THOMSON LICENSING
To: INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS
Reel/Frame 047332/0511 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2018
From: VAN DOORSELAER, KAREL; TIMMS, STUART; VAN OOST, KOEN
To: THOMSON LICENSING
Reel/Frame 046238/0614 →