IP Library Granted Patent US 9,967,628
Granted Patent B2
US 9,967,628 · App. 15/595,849 · Granted May 8, 2018

Rating videos based on parental feedback

Inventors: Shiva Jaini (Santa Clara, CA); Kevin Dame (San Francisco, CA); Bosun Adeoti (Mountain View, CA); Charles Thomas Curry (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Google LLC
H04N21/4756H04N21/4532H04N21/4667H04N21/4668H04N21/4751
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,967,628
App. No.
15/595,849
Filed
May 15, 2017
Granted
May 8, 2018
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2426
USPC
725/28
Abstract

Systems and methods for rating videos based on parental feedback axe presented. In an aspect, a method is provided that includes providing supervisory users respectively having a supervisory role over other users access to watch histories of respective ones of the other users and receiving feedback from the supervisory users regarding appropriateness of a video for the other users, respectively. The method further includes determining an age rating for the media item based on an average age of the other users that the feedback indicates the video is appropriate for, and recommending the video to a user for watching based on the user having an age that satisfies the age rating.

Claims (43)

1. A method comprising:

using, a media provider device that receives a signal over a network and a processor to execute the following computer executable instructions stored in a memory to perform the following acts:

providing a user interface that allows a first user to provide feedback regarding videos watched by a second user;

providing the first user access, via the user interface, to a watch history of the second user, wherein the watch history includes one or more videos watched by the second user:

receiving, in response to input at the user interface, feedback from the first user regarding a video included in the watch history of the second user, the feedback based at least in part on an educational level of the second user and indicating whether the videos are appropriate for viewing by the second user;

inferring an age appropriateness rating and an educational appropriateness rating to associate with the video based on the feedback received from the first user via the user interface; and

recommending additional media items for viewing by the second user, the recommendation determined according to the feedback received from the first user and an education appropriateness rating associated with the media items to be recommended.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: recommending the video to a third user for watching based on the age appropriateness rating and an age of the third user.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a personalized rating for the video that reflects a degree of appropriateness of the video for viewing by a third user based on the feedback, a profile of the third user, and a profile of the second user; and recommending the video to the third user in response to the personalized rating being greater than or equal to a threshold rating.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the profile of the third user and the profile of the second user includes information identifying at least one of: user gender, user ethnicity, user culture, user religion, or user geographic location.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a personalized rating for the video that reflects a degree of appropriateness of the video for viewing by a third user based on the feedback, a profile of the third user, a profile of the second user, a profile of the first user and a profile of a fourth user having a supervisory role over the third user; and

recommending the video to the third user in response to the personalized rating being greater than or equal to a threshold rating.

6. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising computer-readable instructions that, in response to execution, cause a computing system to perform operations, comprising:

providing a user interface that allows, a first user to provide feedback regarding videos watched by a second user;

providing the first user access, via the user interface, to a watch history of the second user, wherein the watch history includes one or more videos watched by the second user,

receiving, in response to input at the user interface, feedback from the first user regarding a video included in the watch history of the second user, the feedback based at least in part on an educational level of the second user and indicating whether the videos are appropriate for viewing by the second user;

inferring an age appropriateness rating and an educational appropriateness rating to associate with the video based on the feedback received from the first user via the user interface: and

recommending additional media items for viewing by the second user, the recommendation determined according to the feedback received from the first user and an education appropriateness rating associated with the media items to be recommended.

7. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6 , the operations further comprising:

determining a personalized rating for the video that reflects a degree of appropriateness of the video for viewing by a third user based on the feedback, a profile of the third user, a profile of the second user, a profile of the first user and a profile of a fourth user having a supervisory role over the third user; and

recommending the video to the third user in response to the personalized rating being greater than or equal to a threshold rating.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6 , the operations further comprising:

recommending the video to a third user for watching based on the age appropriateness rating and an age of the third user.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6 , the operations further comprising:

determining a personalized rating for the video that reflects a degree of appropriateness of the video for viewing by a third user based on the feedback, a profile of the third user, and a profile of the second user; and recommending the video to the third user in response to the personalized rating being greater than or equal to a threshold rating.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein the profile of the third user and the profile of the second user includes information identifying at least one of: user gender, user ethnicity, user culture, user religion, or user geographic location.

11. A media provider device that receives a signal over a network comprising:

a memory; and

a processor operatively coupled to the memory to:

provide a user interface that allows a first user to provide feedback regarding videos watched by a second user;

provide the first user access, via the user interface, to a watch history of the second user, wherein the watch history includes one or more videos watched by the second user:

receive, in response to input at the user interface, feedback from the first user regarding a video included in the watch history of the second user, the feedback based at least in part on an educational level of the second user and indicating whether the videos are appropriate for viewing by the second user;

infer an age appropriateness rating and an educational appropriateness rating to associate with the video based on the feedback received from the first user via the user interface; and

recommend additional media items for viewing by the second user, the recommendation determined according to the feedback received from the first user and an education appropriateness rating associated with the media items to be recommended.

12. The media provider device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further to:

recommend the video to a third user for watching based on the age appropriateness rating and an age of the third user.

13. The media provider device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further to:

determine a personalized rating for the video that reflects a degree of appropriateness of the video for viewing by a third user based on the feedback, a profile of the third user, and a profile of the second user; and recommending the video to the third user in response to the personalized rating being greater than or equal to a threshold rating.

14. The media provider device of claim 13 , wherein the profile of the third user and the profile of the second user includes information identifying at least one of: user gender, user ethnicity, user culture, user religion, or user geographic location.

15. The media provider device of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further to:

determine a personalized rating for the video that reflects a degree of appropriateness of the video for viewing by a third user based on the feedback, a profile of the third user, a profile of the second user, a profile of the first user and a profile of a fourth user having a supervisory role over the third user; and

recommend the video to the third user in response to the personalized rating being greater than or equal to a threshold rating.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 5, 2017
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 044129/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 17, 2017
From: JAINI, SHIVA; DAME, KEVIN; ADEOTI, BOSUN; CURRY, CHARLES THOMAS
To: GOOGLE INC.
Reel/Frame 042417/0900 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 14675114 · Mar 31, 2015
Provisional Application 61972849 · Mar 31, 2014
Related Publication 20170251263A1 · Aug 31, 2017