IP Library Granted Patent US 10,765,225
Granted Patent B2
US 10,765,225 · App. 15/597,784 · Granted Sep 8, 2020

Occupant support with a migration sensitive bladder and method for migration detection

Inventors: Christopher R. O'Keefe (Columbus, OH); Timothy J. Receveur (Guilford, IN); Aziz A. Bhai (Fishers, IN); Luke Gibson (Greensburg, IN); Charles A. Lachenbruch (Batesville, IN); Rachel Williamson (Batesville, IN)
Assignee: Hill-Rom Services, Inc.
A47C27/083A47C27/10A47C27/08A61G7/05769
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,765,225
App. No.
15/597,784
Granted
Sep 8, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for detecting occupant position change on a support surface includes establishing a rate of change of pressure in a head end test zone and in a foot end test zone, comparing the head end rate to at least one head end rate limit, comparing the foot end rate to at least one foot end rate limit, and inferring, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred. An associated occupant support includes a frame and a mattress. The mattress includes head and foot zones each having at least one pressurizable bladder. The support also includes a controller adapted to compare a head end rate of pressure change to a head end rate limit, to compare a foot end rate of pressure change to a foot end rate limit, and to infer, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.

Claims (36)

1. A bed comprising:

a frame;

a mattress supported by the frame, the mattress including a head zone having at least one fluid pressurizable bladder and a foot zone having at least one fluid pressurizable bladder;

a controller operable to:

compare a head end rate of pressure change to at least one head end rate limit;

compare a foot end rate of pressure change to at least one foot end rate limit; and

infer, in response to the comparing steps, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.

2. The bed of claim 1 in which the head zone and the foot zone each include multiple bladders.

3. The bed of claim 1 in which the head zone and the foot zone are longitudinally separated from each other by an intermediate zone.

4. The bed of claim 3 in which one or more bladders resides in the intermediate zone, the bladders being the principal medium for supporting an occupant of the mattress in the intermediate zone.

5. The bed of claim 3 in which a medium other than one or more bladders resides in the intermediate zone and is the principal medium for supporting an occupant of the mattress in the intermediate zone.

6. The bed of claim 5 in which the medium is foam.

7. The bed of claim 2 in which the head zone, the foot zone or both include a foam medium for at least partially supporting an occupant of the bed, the foam medium having a frame side and an occupant side, and in which the at least one head zone bladder is embedded in the foam medium.

8. The bed of claim 2 in which the head zone, the foot zone or both include a foam medium for at least partially supporting an occupant of the bed, the foam medium having a frame side and an occupant side, and in which the at least one head zone bladder is exposed on the frame side of the medium.

9. The bed of claim 2 in which the head zone, the foot zone or both include a foam medium for at least partially supporting an occupant of the bed, the foam medium having a frame side and an occupant side, and in which the at least one head zone bladder is exposed on the occupant side of the medium.

10. The bed of claim 1 in which the at least one head end rate limit is a fast head end rate limit, and the at least one foot end rate limit is a fast foot end rate limit.

11. The bed of claim 10 in which the inference is a positive result for occupant migration if the head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit or if the foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit.

12. The bed of claim 10 in which the inference produces a positive result for occupant migration if the head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit and if the foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit.

13. The bed of claim 10 including a slow head end rate limit and a slow foot end rate limit.

14. The bed of claim 13 in which the inference is a positive result for occupant migration if the established head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit and faster than the slow head end rate limit or if the established foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit and faster than the slow foot end rate limit.

15. The bed of claim 13 in which the inference is a positive result for occupant migration if the established head end pressure rate is slower than the fast head end rate limit and faster than the slow head end rate limit and if the established foot end pressure rate is slower than the fast foot end rate limit and faster than the slow foot end rate limit.

16. The bed of claim 1 in which the inference produces a result with regard to occupant migration and the result is accepted as conclusive.

17. The bed of claim 1 in which when the inference is a positive result for occupant migration, the inferring step is followed by a validation.

18. The bed of claim 17 in which the validation includes

changing at least one of pressure in the head zone and pressure in the foot zone in response to the inferred positive result;

determining a head end pressure derivative based on the change in pressure in the head zone and/or determining a foot end pressure derivative based on the change in the pressure in the foot zone;

conducting a comparison of the pressure derivative or derivatives and an associated pressure derivative threshold; and

concluding, in response to the conducting step, whether or not occupant migration has occurred.

19. The bed of claim 18 in which:

both the pressure in the head zone and the pressure in the foot zone are changed in response to the inferred positive result;

the determining analysis is carried out for both the head zone and the foot zone; and

the concluding analysis is positive for occupant migration if the comparison for the head zone, the comparison for the foot zone, or both indicate occupant migration.

20. The bed of claim 16 in which the conclusion of occupant migration is followed by the controller doing any one of:

issuing an alarm;

taking an action intended to mitigate additional migration; and

taking an action to mitigate adverse effects of the migration.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 050260/0644 Recorded Dec 14, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BREATHE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.; HILL-ROM, INC.; VOALTE, INC.; BARDY DIAGNOSTICS, INC.; HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 058517/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 4, 2019
From: HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.; HILL-ROM, INC.; HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.; ALLEN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.; ANODYNE MEDICAL DEVICE, INC.; VOALTE, INC.; WELCH ALLYN, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 050260/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 12, 2017
From: O'KEEFE, CHRISTOPHER R.; RECEVEUR, TIMOTHY J.; BHAI, AZIZ A.; GIBSON, LUKE; LACHENBRUCH, CHARLES A.; WILLIAMSON, RACHEL
To: HILL-ROM SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 043562/0187 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13443234 · Apr 10, 2012
Related Publication 20170246062A1 · Aug 31, 2017