IP Library Granted Patent US 11,083,074
Granted Patent B2
US 11,083,074 · App. 15/601,796 · Granted Aug 3, 2021

Scanning linear accelerator system having stable pulsing at multiple energies and doses

Inventors: William L. Nighan, Jr. (Portola Valley, CA); Maarten Korringa (Mountain View, CA); John Howard Rolin (Morgan Hill, CA); Devin Kirk Herderlong (Boulder Creek, CA)
Assignee: ETM Electromatic, Inc.
H05G2/00H05G1/20H05H7/02H05H9/048H05H2007/022H05H2007/025
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,083,074
App. No.
15/601,796
Granted
Aug 3, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A linac-based X-ray system for cargo scanning and imaging applications uses linac design, RF power control, beam current control, and beam current pulse duration control to provide stable sequences of pulses having different energy levels or different doses.

Claims (26)

1. An X-ray system for providing X-ray pulses of controlled dose per pulse comprising

a linear accelerator having a triode gun,

a control system,

an RF source responsive to the control system to supply RF pulses to the linear accelerator, the RF pulses having a power,

an electron gun driver connected to the triode gun and providing a gun driver grid voltage thereto, responsive to the control system but controlled independently of the RF source, for supplying to the linear accelerator pulses of controllable beam current at times substantially corresponding to RF pulses,

the RF source and electron gun driver being configured cooperatively to cause the generation of X-ray pulses of a first energy and first dose for scanning a first region, and to cause the generation of X-ray pulses of a second energy and second dose for scanning a second region.

2. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the first dose used for scanning the first region is lower than the second dose used for scanning the second region.

3. The X-ray system of claim 2 wherein the first dose is no more than one-tenth the second dose.

4. The X-ray system of claim 2 wherein the first dose is no more than one-one-hundredth the second dose.

5. The X-ray system of claim 2 wherein the first energy is substantially the same as the second energy.

6. The X-ray system of claim 2 wherein the first energy is not substantially the same as the second energy.

7. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the first dose is lower than the second dose, and the gun driver grid voltage provided to the triode gun for scanning the first region is substantially the same as the gun driver grid voltage provided to the triode gun for scanning the second region.

8. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the first dose is lower than the second dose, and the gun driver grid voltage provided to the triode gun for scanning the first region is not substantially the same as the gun driver grid voltage provided to the triode gun for scanning the second region.

9. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the first dose is lower than the second dose, and the gun driver pulses supplied to the linear accelerator have a duration, the duration of the pulses provided for scanning the first region is substantially shorter than the duration of the pulses provided for scanning the second region.

10. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the first dose is lower than the second dose, and the power of the RF pulses supplied to the linear accelerator for scanning the first region is different from the power of the RF pulses supplied to the linear accelerator for scanning the second region.

11. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the first energy and first dose used for scanning the first region transitions to the second energy and second dose used for scanning a second region without substantially disrupting either an image resulting from scanning the first region or an image resulting from scanning the second region.

12. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition between the first energy and first dose and the second energy and second dose is accomplished on a pulse to pulse basis.

13. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition from the first energy and first dose to the second energy and second dose is accomplished in less than 2.5 milliseconds.

14. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition from the first energy and first dose to the second energy and second dose is accomplished in less than 5 milliseconds.

15. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition from the first energy and first dose to the second energy and second dose is accomplished in less than 10 milliseconds.

16. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition from the first energy and first dose to the second energy and second dose is accomplished in less than 25 milliseconds.

17. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition from the first energy and first dose to the second energy and second dose is accomplished in less than 100 milliseconds.

18. The X-ray system of claim 1 wherein the transition from the first energy and first dose to the second energy and second dose is accomplished in less than 250 milliseconds.

19. The X-ray system of claim 1 where the electron gun driver is configured to change grid voltage on a time scale short enough to transition between the doses and energies associated with the first and second regions that image quality of the images resulting from scanning the first and second regions is not degraded.

20. The X-ray system of claim 1 where the electron gun driver comprises first and second grid power supplies set at different grid voltages, with the first grid power supply providing pulses for scanning the first region, and the second grid power supply providing pulses for scanning the second region.

21. The X-ray system of claim 1 where at least one of the first and second doses is sufficiently low that scanning of the associated first or second region is safe for humans in that region.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE APP NOS 10737122, 10757798, & 10420201 WERE INCORRECTLY ID ON THE COVER SHEET. THESE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ID AS PATENT REG NOS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055948 FRAME 0048. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ETM-ELECTROMATIC, INC.. Recorded Apr 20, 2021
From: ETM-ELECTROMATIC, INC.
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 057265/0773 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2021
From: ETM-ELECTROMATIC, INC.
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 055948/0048 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 4, 2017
From: NIGHAN, WILLIAM L., JR; KORRINGA, MAARTEN; ROLIN, JOHN HOWARD; HENDERLONG, DEVIN KIRK
To: ETM ELECTROMATIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 043208/0428 →