Systems and methods for performing security actions based on people's actual reactions to interactions

1. A computer-implemented method for performing security actions based on people's actual reactions to interactions, at least a portion of the method being performed by a computing device comprising at least one processor, the method comprising:

detecting an interaction of a monitored person;

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction;

using contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction;

comparing an estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to an estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction; and

performing a security action based at least in part on a comparison of the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction and the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the monitored person comprises a child;

performing the security action comprises reporting the interaction to the child's guardian.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

detecting the interaction of the monitored person comprises detecting a communication that the monitored person views;

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises determining that the monitored person's expected reaction to the communication should be positive;

using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises using the contemporaneous sensor data to determine that the monitored person's actual reaction to the communication was negative; and

comparing the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction comprises identifying a difference between the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction and the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction;

performing the security action comprises determining, based at least in part on the difference, that the communication is a form of cyberbullying.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises:

using additional sensor data to estimate at least one additional monitored person's actual reaction to a similar interaction; and

using the at least one additional monitored person's actual reaction to the similar interaction to establish a baseline normal reaction to the interaction; and

the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction is based at least in part on the baseline normal reaction to the interaction.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein:

comparing the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction comprises identifying a difference between the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction and the baseline normal reaction;

performing the security action comprises determining, based at least in part on the difference, that the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction is abnormal.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises using prior sensor data to estimate a prior reaction of the monitored person to a similar interaction; and

the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction is based at least in part on the prior reaction of the monitored person to the similar interaction.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein:

comparing the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction comprises identifying a difference between the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction and the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction;

performing the security action comprises determining, based at least in part on the difference, that the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction is abnormal.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises:

using contemporaneous camera data to detect a microexpression that was exhibited by the monitored person as the monitored person had the interaction; and

deriving the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction based at least in part on the microexpression that was exhibited by the monitored person.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the contemporaneous sensor data indicates an actual physical reaction of the monitored person to the interaction; and

using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises estimating the monitored person's actual emotional reaction to the interaction based at least in part on the actual physical reaction of the monitored person to the interaction.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the contemporaneous sensor data indicates at least one of:

the monitored person's heartrate at the time of the interaction;

the monitored person's blood pressure at the time of the interaction;

the monitored person's stress level at the time of the interaction; and

the monitored person's skin temperature at the time of the interaction.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

detecting the interaction of the monitored person comprises detecting digital content with which the monitored person interacts;

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the digital content; and

using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the digital content.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

detecting the interaction of the monitored person comprises detecting an additional person with which the monitored person interacts;

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the additional person; and

using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the additional person.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

detecting the interaction of the monitored person comprises detecting an environment with which the monitored person interacts;

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the environment; and

using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises using the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the environment.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

estimating the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction comprises using information about the interaction as input to a first model that outputs the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction;

using contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction comprises using the contemporaneous sensor data as input to a second model that outputs the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction.

15. A system for performing security actions based on people's actual reactions to interactions, the system comprising:

a detecting module, stored in memory, that detects an interaction of a monitored person;

an estimating module, stored in memory, that estimates the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction;

a sensing module, stored in memory, that uses contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction;

a security module, stored in memory, that:

compares an estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to an estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction; and

performs a security action based at least in part on a comparison of the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction and the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction; and

at least one physical processor that executes the detecting module, the estimating module, the sensing module, and the security module.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the monitored person comprises a child;

the security module performs the security action by reporting the interaction to the child's guardian.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the detecting module detects the interaction of the monitored person by detecting a communication that the monitored person views;

the estimating module estimates the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction by determining that the monitored person's expected reaction to the communication should be positive;

the sensing module uses the contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction by using the contemporaneous sensor data to determine that the monitored person's actual reaction to the communication was negative; and

the security module performs the security action by:

comparing the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction comprises identifying a difference between the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction and the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction; and

determining, based at least in part on the difference, that the communication is a form of cyberbullying.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the estimating module estimates the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction by:

using additional sensor data to estimate at least one additional monitored person's actual reaction to a similar interaction; and

using the at least one additional monitored person's actual reaction to the similar interaction to establish a baseline normal reaction to the interaction; and

the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction is based at least in part on the baseline normal reaction to the interaction.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the security module performs the security action by:

comparing the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction comprises identifying a difference between the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction and the baseline normal reaction;

determining, based at least in part on the difference, that the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction is abnormal.

20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to:

detect an interaction of a monitored person;

estimate the monitored person's expected reaction to the interaction;

use contemporaneous sensor data to estimate the monitored person's actual reaction to the interaction;

compare an estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction to an estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction; and

perform a security action based at least in part on a comparison of the estimation of the monitored person's expected reaction and the estimation of the monitored person's actual reaction.