IP Library Granted Patent US 10,331,516
Granted Patent B2
US 10,331,516 · App. 15/636,454 · Granted Jun 25, 2019

Content-aware data recovery method for elastic cloud storage

Inventors: Mikhail Danilov (Saint Petersburg, RU); Konstantin Buinov (Kirovsk, RU); Kirill Gusakov (Saint Petersburg, RU); Sergey Koyushev (Saint Petersburg, RU); Maxim S. Trusov (Saint Petersburg, RU)
Assignee: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
G06F11/1076G06F3/064G06F3/067G06F3/0608H03M13/154H03M13/373H03M13/3761H03M13/616
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,331,516
App. No.
15/636,454
Granted
Jun 25, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for avoiding recovery and storage of useless data is disclosed. The operations comprise: determining that a subset of data fragments out of a plurality of data fragments have become unavailable, the plurality of data fragments forming a data chunk, wherein the plurality of data fragments are protected by additional redundancy data; determining whether all of data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments when the unavailable subset of data fragments were available would be useless if recovered using remaining available data fragments of the data chunk and the redundancy data; and in response to determining that all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless if recovered, generating new redundancy data for protecting the remaining available data fragments of the data chunk without recovering the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments.

Claims (32)

1. A method for avoiding recovery and storage of useless data, comprising:

determining that a subset of data fragments out of a plurality of data fragments have become unavailable, the plurality of data fragments forming a data chunk, wherein the plurality of data fragments are protected by additional redundancy data;

determining whether all of data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments when the unavailable subset of data fragments were available would be useless if recovered using remaining available data fragments of the data chunk and the redundancy data; and

in response to determining that all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless if recovered, generating new redundancy data for protecting the remaining available data fragments of the data chunk without recovering the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining whether all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless comprises determining whether all user objects associated with the unavailable subset of data fragments have been deleted.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein whether all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless is determined based on reference tables.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the new redundancy data are generated based on erasure coding.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the new redundancy data are generated in part with predetermined fake data, wherein the predetermined fake data is used whenever data from the unavailable subset of data fragments would be needed in the new redundancy data generation.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the predetermined fake data are not stored.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the predetermined fake data are one of: 1) all 0's, or 2) all 1's.

8. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having instructions stored therein which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform data protection operations, the operations comprising:

determining that a subset of data fragments out of a plurality of data fragments have become unavailable, the plurality of data fragments forming a data chunk, wherein the plurality of data fragments are protected by additional redundancy data;

determining whether all of data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments when the unavailable subset of data fragments were available would be useless if recovered using remaining available data fragments of the data chunk and the redundancy data; and

in response to determining that all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless if recovered, generating new redundancy data for protecting the remaining available data fragments of the data chunk without recovering the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments.

9. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein determining whether all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless comprises determining whether all user objects associated with the unavailable subset of data fragments have been deleted.

10. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein whether all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless is determined based on reference tables.

11. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the new redundancy data are generated based on erasure coding.

12. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the new redundancy data are generated in part with predetermined fake data, wherein the predetermined fake data is used whenever data from the unavailable subset of data fragments would be needed in the new redundancy data generation.

13. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the predetermined fake data are not stored.

14. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the predetermined fake data are one of: 1) all 0's, or 2) all 1's.

15. A data processing system, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform data protection operations, the operations including:

determining that a subset of data fragments out of a plurality of data fragments have become unavailable, the plurality of data fragments forming a data chunk, wherein the plurality of data fragments are protected by additional redundancy data;

determining whether all of data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments when the unavailable subset of data fragments were available would be useless if recovered using remaining available data fragments of the data chunk and the redundancy data; and

in response to determining that all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless if recovered, generating new redundancy data for protecting the remaining available data fragments of the data chunk without recovering the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments.

16. The data processing system of claim 15 , wherein determining whether all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless comprises determining whether all user objects associated with the unavailable subset of data fragments have been deleted.

17. The data processing system of claim 15 , wherein whether all of the data that were stored in the unavailable subset of data fragments would be useless is determined based on reference tables.

18. The data processing system of claim 15 , wherein the new redundancy data are generated based on erasure coding.

19. The data processing system of claim 15 , wherein the new redundancy data are generated in part with predetermined fake data, wherein the predetermined fake data is used whenever data from the unavailable subset of data fragments would be needed in the new redundancy data generation.

20. The data processing system of claim 19 , wherein the predetermined fake data are not stored.

21. The data processing system of claim 19 , wherein the predetermined fake data are one of: 1) all 0's, or 2) all 1's.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053546/0001) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 071642/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (047648/0422) Recorded May 20, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 060160/0862 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 047648 FRAME 0346 Recorded Nov 2, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 058298/0510 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2020
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053546/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 21, 2019
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049452/0223 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (CREDIT) Recorded Oct 12, 2018
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047648/0346 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES) Recorded Oct 12, 2018
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047648/0422 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2017
From: DANILOV, MIKHAIL; BUINOV, KONSTANTIN; GUSAKOV, KIRILL; KOYUSHEV, SERGEY; TRUSOV, MAXIM S.
To: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 042854/0735 →
Priority Claims (1)
RU 2016150866 · Dec 23, 2016 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180181466A1 · Jun 28, 2018