IP Library Granted Patent US 11,481,411
Granted Patent B2
US 11,481,411 · App. 15/662,226 · Granted Oct 25, 2022

Systems and methods for automated generation classifiers

Inventors: Vishnuvyas Sethumadhavan (Mountain View, CA); John O. Schneider (Los Gatos, CA); Jose Cruz Toledo (Redwood City, CA)
Assignee: Apixio, Inc.
G06F16/285G06Q10/04G06Q10/0639G06Q10/10G06Q50/22G06V30/413G16H10/60G16H50/70G06V40/376G16H40/20G16H50/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,481,411
App. No.
15/662,226
Granted
Oct 25, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods to automatically generate classifiers are provided. A labeled dataset is initially received. The dataset may be for a positive class, or may be a negative for a class, or a false positive class. N features that are predictive for the class (or false positive or the negative class) are identified. These features are combined within a classifier dictionary. Medical records received may be processed in order to be machine readable. Features within the medical records are identified and are compared against the dictionary of classifiers. Matches indicate classes within the medical record. The classifier dictionary may be periodically updated in response to insufficient classification accuracy, or when new data becomes available.

Claims (35)

1. A computerized method for generating classifiers implemented using an automated classifier computer system comprising processor in communication with a memory, the method comprising:

receiving a first labeled dataset associated with positive medical diagnoses, a second labeled dataset associated with false positive medical diagnoses, and a third labeled dataset associated with negative medical diagnoses;

determining N features predictive of a positive medical diagnosis using the first labeled dataset, M features predictive of a false positive medical diagnosis using the second labeled dataset, and P features predictive of a negative medical diagnosis using the third labeled dataset;

generating a first feature dictionary by associating the N features with a plurality of medical code classifiers;

generating a second feature dictionary by associating the M features with the plurality of medical code classifiers;

generating a third feature dictionary by associating the P features with the plurality of medical code classifiers;

generating a master feature dictionary for evaluating healthcare documents for code-able events by combining the first feature dictionary, the second feature dictionary, and the third feature dictionary;

receiving a digital medical record from an electronic records system;

identifying features in the digital medical record in a backend processor; and

determining at least one classifier of the plurality of medical code classifiers to assign to the digital medical record by utilizing the master feature dictionary.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein finding N features includes mutual information feature selection methods.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first labeled dataset includes an evaluation dataset and a training dataset.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein finding N features uses the training dataset.

5. The method of claim 3 , further comprising identifying test features in the evaluation dataset, and matching the test features to the N features predictive of a positive medical diagnosis to determine at least one test classifier.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising comparing the at least one test classifier to at least one known classifier for the evaluation dataset.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising updating the N features if the at least one test classifier does not match the at least one known classifier.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, at an interface of the automated classifier computer system, the first labeled dataset associated with positive medical diagnoses, the second labeled dataset associated with false positive medical diagnoses, and the third labeled dataset associated with negative medical diagnoses.

9. An automated classifier computer system comprising:

a feature selector embodied on an analytics layer of a server system configured to:

receive a first labeled dataset associated with positive medical diagnoses, a second labeled dataset associated with false positive medical diagnoses, and a third labeled dataset associated with negative medical diagnoses;

determine N features predictive of a positive medical diagnosis using the first labeled dataset, M features predictive of a false positive medical diagnosis using the second labeled dataset, and P features predictive of a negative medical diagnosis using the third labeled dataset;

generate a first feature dictionary by associating the N features with a plurality of medical code classifiers;

generate a second feature dictionary by associating the M features with the plurality of medical code classifiers;

generate a third feature dictionary by associating the P features with the plurality of medical code classifiers; and

generate a master feature dictionary for evaluating healthcare documents for code-able events by combining the first feature dictionary, the second feature dictionary, and the third feature dictionary; and

a classifier embodied on a backend processor configured to:

receive a digital medical record from an electronic records system;

identify features in the digital medical record; and

determine at least one classifier of the plurality of medical code classifiers to assign to the digital medical record by utilizing the master feature dictionary.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein finding N features includes mutual information feature selection methods.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the first labeled dataset includes an evaluation dataset and a training dataset.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein finding N features uses the training dataset.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the classifier is further configured to identify test features in the evaluation dataset, and match the test features to the N features predictive of a positive medical diagnosis to determine at least one test classifier.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the classifier is further configured to compare the at least one test classifier to at least one known classifier for the evaluation dataset.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the feature selector is further configured to update the N features if the at least one test classifier does not match the at least one known classifier.

Assignments (5)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 44033 FRAME 490. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Recorded Dec 11, 2024
From: SETHUMADHAVAN, VISHNUVYAS; SCHNEIDER, JOHN O.; TOLEDO, JOSE CRUZ
To: APIXIO INC.
Reel/Frame 069588/0297 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: CHURCHILL AGENCY SERVICES LLC
To: APIXIO, LLC (F/K/A APIXIO INC.)
Reel/Frame 068453/0713 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Jul 12, 2023
From: APIXIO INC.
To: APIXIO, LLC
Reel/Frame 064259/0006 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 13, 2023
From: APIXIO INC.
To: CHURCHILL AGENCY SERVICES LLC
Reel/Frame 063928/0847 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2017
From: SETHUMADHAVAN, VISHNUVYAS; SCHNEIDER, JOHN O.; TOLEDO, JOSE CRUZ
To: APIXIO, INC.
Reel/Frame 044033/0490 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation In Part 13747336 · Jan 22, 2013
Continuation In Part 13223228 · Aug 31, 2011
Provisional Application 62369003 · Jul 29, 2016
Provisional Application 61590330 · Jan 24, 2012
Provisional Application 61379228 · Sep 1, 2010
Related Publication 20180011922A1 · Jan 11, 2018
Cited By (1)
US 12,651,475