IP Library Granted Patent US 10,607,493
Granted Patent B2
US 10,607,493 · App. 15/682,617 · Granted Mar 31, 2020

Aircraft arrival determination systems and methods

Inventors: Samantha A. Schwartz (Castle Pines, CO); Garoe Gonzalez Parra (Frankfurt am Main, DE); Adam Karwan (Gliwice, PL); Marcin Zadroga (Gdynia, PL); Daniel Roman Jarozewski (Wiebaden, DE); Wolfgang Ludwig Mergenthaler (Floersheim am Main, DE)
Assignee: THE BOEING COMPANY
G08G5/0039G08G5/0008G08G5/0013G08G5/0021G08G5/0026G08G5/0034G08G5/0043G08G5/0056G08G5/0078G08G5/0082G08G5/0091
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,607,493
App. No.
15/682,617
Granted
Mar 31, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

An aircraft arrival determination system includes an arrival sequence determination unit that is configured to determine a position of an aircraft within a landing queue for a destination airport and an estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport. A landing suggestion unit is configured to provide a landing suggestion for the aircraft. The landing suggestion provides information related to landing at the destination airport or diverting from the destination airport to an alternate airport.

Claims (66)

1. An aircraft arrival determination system comprising:

an arrival sequence determination unit that is configured to determine a position of an aircraft within a landing queue for a destination airport and an estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport; and

a user interface that is configured to show the position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport and the estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport, wherein the user interface provides a visual display that allows an individual to determine whether there is a need to divert from the destination airport to an alternate airport, wherein the user interface comprises:

a weather section that shows weather graphics indicative of current weather conditions at the destination airport and the alternate airport;

a traffic section that shows traffic graphics indicative of a current position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport; and

a fuel factors section that shows a bug out fuel graphic indicative of an amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport,

wherein the user interface further shows a bug out distance in relation to the destination airport, wherein the bug out distance represents a decision threshold in which a decision to the alternate airport is to be made before reaching.

2. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a landing suggestion unit that is configured to provide a landing suggestion for the aircraft, wherein the landing suggestion provides information related to landing at the destination airport or diverting from the destination airport to an alternate airport.

3. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 2 , wherein the landing suggestion unit is configured to provide the landing suggestion based on a first distance between the aircraft and the destination airport, a second distance between the aircraft and the alternate airport, and a remaining amount of fuel of the aircraft.

4. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 1 , further comprising a tracking sub-system that is configured to track a location of the aircraft in relation to the destination airport.

5. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 4 , wherein the tracking sub-system is an automatic depending surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) tracking sub-system.

6. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 1 , further comprising a weather detection sub-system that is configured to detect weather conditions proximate to the destination airport.

7. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 1 , wherein the user interface is onboard the aircraft.

8. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 1 , wherein the user interface comprises one or both of an airport comparison section or a comparison graph, wherein the airport comparison section and the comparison graph show a graphical representation of a landing decision comparison between the destination airport and the alternate airport that shows a destination airport projected cost use indication and an alternate airport projected cost use indication, wherein the destination airport projected cost use indication and the alternate airport projected cost use indication are indicative of a cost of fuel and penalties arising from falling below a bug out fuel minimum.

9. An aircraft arrival determination method comprising:

determining, by an arrival sequence determination unit, a position of an aircraft within a landing queue for a destination airport and an estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport; and

showing, on a user interface, the position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport and the estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport, wherein the user interface provides a visual display that allows an individual to determine whether there is a need to divert from the destination airport to an alternate airport, wherein the showing comprises:

showing, on a weather section, weather graphics indicative of current weather conditions at the destination airport and the alternate airport;

showing, on a traffic section, traffic graphics indicative of a current position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport;

showing, on a fuel factors section, a bug out fuel graphic indicative of an amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport; and

showing a bug out distance in relation to the destination airport, wherein the bug out distance represents a decision threshold in which a decision to the alternate airport is to be made before reaching.

10. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 9 , further comprising:

providing, by a landing suggestion unit, a landing suggestion for the aircraft, wherein the landing suggestion provides information related to landing at the destination airport or diverting from the destination airport to an alternate airport.

11. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 10 , wherein the providing comprises basing the landing suggestion unit on a first distance between the aircraft and the destination airport, a second distance between the aircraft and the alternate airport, and a remaining amount of fuel of the aircraft.

12. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 9 , further comprising tracking, by a tracking sub-system, a location of the aircraft in relation to the destination airport.

13. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 9 , further comprising detecting, by a weather detection sub-system, weather conditions proximate to the destination airport.

14. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 9 , wherein the showing comprises showing, on one or both of an airport comparison section or a comparison graph, a graphical representation of a landing decision comparison between the destination airport and the alternate airport that shows a destination airport projected cost use indication and an alternate airport projected cost use indication, wherein the destination airport projected cost use indication and the alternate airport projected cost use indication are indicative of a cost of fuel and penalties arising from falling below a bug out fuel minimum.

15. An aircraft arrival determination system comprising:

an arrival sequence determination unit that is configured to determine a position of an aircraft within a landing queue for a destination airport and an estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport;

a landing suggestion unit that is configured to provide a landing suggestion for the aircraft, wherein the landing suggestion provides information related to landing at the destination airport or diverting from the destination airport to an alternate airport, wherein the landing suggestion unit is configured to provide the landing suggestion based on a first distance between the aircraft and the destination airport, a second distance between the aircraft and the alternate airport, and a remaining amount of fuel of the aircraft;

an automatic depending surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) tracking sub-system that is configured to track a location of the aircraft in relation to the destination airport;

a weather detection sub-system that is configured to detect weather conditions proximate to the destination airport; and

a user interface that is configured to show the position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport and the estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport, wherein the user interface provides a visual display that allows an individual to determine whether there is a need to divert from the destination airport to the alternate airport, wherein the user interface comprises:

a weather section that shows weather graphics indicative of current weather conditions at the destination airport and the alternate airport;

a traffic section that shows traffic graphics indicative of a current position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport;

a fuel factors section that shows a bug out fuel graphic indicative of an amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport, wherein the user interface further shows a bug out distance in relation to the destination airport, wherein the bug out distance represents a decision threshold in which a decision to the alternate airport is to be made before reaching, wherein the bug out fuel graphic also shows an emergency probability index indicative of a probability of the amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport falling below a predetermined safe level;

an airport comparison section and a comparison graph that show a landing decision comparison between the destination airport and the alternate airport that shows a destination airport projected cost use indication and an alternate airport projected cost use indication, wherein the destination airport projected cost use indication and the alternate airport projected cost use indication are indicative of a cost of fuel and penalties arising from falling below a bug out fuel minimum.

16. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 1 , wherein the bug out fuel graphic also shows an emergency probability index indicative of a probability of the amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport falling below a predetermined safe level.

17. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 9 , wherein the showing on the fuel factors section further comprises showing an emergency probability index indicative of a probability of the amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport falling below a predetermined safe level.

18. An aircraft arrival determination system comprising:

an arrival sequence determination unit that is configured to determine a position of an aircraft within a landing queue for a destination airport and an estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport; and

a user interface that is configured to show the position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport and the estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport, wherein the user interface provides a visual display that allows an individual to determine whether there is a need to divert from the destination airport to an alternate airport, wherein the user interface comprises:

a weather section that shows weather graphics indicative of current weather conditions at the destination airport and the alternate airport;

a traffic section that shows traffic graphics indicative of a current position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport; and

a fuel factors section that shows a bug out fuel graphic indicative of an amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport, wherein the bug out fuel graphic also shows an emergency probability index indicative of a probability of the amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport falling below a predetermined safe level.

19. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 18 , further comprising:

a landing suggestion unit that is configured to provide a landing suggestion for the aircraft, wherein the landing suggestion provides information related to landing at the destination airport or diverting from the destination airport to an alternate airport.

20. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 19 , wherein the landing suggestion unit is configured to provide the landing suggestion based on a first distance between the aircraft and the destination airport, a second distance between the aircraft and the alternate airport, and a remaining amount of fuel of the aircraft.

21. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 18 , further comprising a tracking sub-system that is configured to track a location of the aircraft in relation to the destination airport.

22. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 21 , wherein the tracking sub-system is an automatic depending surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) tracking sub-system.

23. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 18 , further comprising a weather detection sub-system that is configured to detect weather conditions proximate to the destination airport.

24. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 18 , wherein the user interface is onboard the aircraft.

25. The aircraft arrival determination system of claim 18 , wherein the user interface comprises one or both of an airport comparison section or a comparison graph, wherein the airport comparison section and the comparison graph show a graphical representation of a landing decision comparison between the destination airport and the alternate airport that shows a destination airport projected cost use indication and an alternate airport projected cost use indication, wherein the destination airport projected cost use indication and the alternate airport projected cost use indication are indicative of a cost of fuel and penalties arising from falling below a bug out fuel minimum.

26. An aircraft arrival determination method comprising:

determining, by an arrival sequence determination unit, a position of an aircraft within a landing queue for a destination airport and an estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport; and

showing, on a user interface, the position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport and the estimated landing time for the aircraft at the destination airport, wherein the user interface provides a visual display that allows an individual to determine whether there is a need to divert from the destination airport to an alternate airport, wherein the showing comprises:

showing, on a weather section, weather graphics indicative of current weather conditions at the destination airport and the alternate airport;

showing, on a traffic section, traffic graphics indicative of a current position of the aircraft within the landing queue for the destination airport;

showing, on a fuel factors section, a bug out fuel graphic indicative of an amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport; and

showing an emergency probability index indicative of a probability of the amount of fuel left for the aircraft to land at the alternate airport falling below a predetermined safe level.

27. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 26 , further comprising:

providing, by a landing suggestion unit, a landing suggestion for the aircraft, wherein the landing suggestion provides information related to landing at the destination airport or diverting from the destination airport to an alternate airport.

28. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 27 , wherein the providing comprises basing the landing suggestion unit on a first distance between the aircraft and the destination airport, a second distance between the aircraft and the alternate airport, and a remaining amount of fuel of the aircraft.

29. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 26 , further comprising tracking, by a tracking sub-system, a location of the aircraft in relation to the destination airport.

30. The aircraft arrival determination method of claim 26 , further comprising detecting, by a weather detection sub-system, weather conditions proximate to the destination airport.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2026
From: THE BOEING COMPANY
To: JEPPESEN FOREFLIGHT, INC. (F/K/A BOEING DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 074967/0544 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2025
From: FOREFLIGHT LLC; JEPPESEN FOREFLIGHT, INC.
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073622/0920 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2025
From: THE BOEING COMPANY
To: BOEING DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 073156/0773 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2017
From: SCHWARTZ, SAMANTHA A.; PARRA, GAROE GONZALEZ; KARWAN, ADAM; ZADROGA, MARCIN; JAROSZEWSKI, DANIEL ROMAN
To: THE BOEING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 043351/0680 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190066520A1 · Feb 28, 2019