IP Library Patent Application 15707892
Patent Application
App. No. 15/707,892

COGNITIVE MODELING APPARATUS FOR DEFUZZIFICATION OF MULTIPLE QUALITATIVE SIGNALS INTO HUMAN-CENTRIC THREAT NOTIFICATIONS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/707,892
Abstract

The present design is directed to a system for defuzzification of multiple qualitative signals into human-centric threat notifications using cognitive computing techniques, including a series of periodic execution components configured to operate over full or partial sets of received data, and a plurality of event reception components configured to operate on each event in a stream relevant to a terrain and selectively provide information to the series of periodic execution components. The system detects and signals anomalies upon detecting behavior inconsistent with normal behavior.

Claims (35)

1 . A system for defuzzification of multiple qualitative signals into human-centric threat notifications using cognitive computing techniques, comprising:

a series of periodic execution components configured to operate over full or partial sets of received data; and

a plurality of event reception components configured to operate on each event in a stream relevant to a terrain and selectively provide information to the series of periodic execution components;

wherein the system detects and signals anomalies upon detecting behavior inconsistent with normal behavior.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein an anomaly has properties including severity and degree of inconsistency from normal behavior represented by mathematical distance, wherein severity is a class of anomaly assigned by an analytical component that detected and measured the anomaly.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the system detects and signals hazards, wherein a hazard is an unperfected threat associated with an actor without regard to any related assets or the behavior of other actors.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein a hazard represents risk to an enterprise based on cumulative multi-dimensional behaviors comprising anomalous states generated from thresholds, orders of operation, peer-to-peer similarity, and actor behavior change over time.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein a hazard has two properties comprising severity of medium, elevated or high, derived from inherent terrain risks.

6 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the system detects and signals threats, wherein a threat is a perfected threat that ties together actors with behaviors of other actors and assets used by all actors in a hazard collection.

7 . The system of claim 5 , wherein:

threats develop a sequence of operations over a dynamic time-frame; and

threats are connected in a heterogeneous graph comprising nodes and edges, wherein nodes can be actors or assets and edges define the dynamic time-frame as well as the strength of their connection as a function of risk.

8 . A system, comprising:

a series of periodic execution components configured to operate over full or partial sets of received data;

a plurality of event reception components configured to operate on each event in a stream relevant to a terrain and selectively provide information to the series of periodic execution components; and

a signal manager configured to manage signals for one of the series of periodic execution components and the plurality of event reception components;

wherein the system performs defuzzification of multiple qualitative signals into human-centric threat notifications using cognitive computing techniques by detecting and signaling anomalies upon detecting behavior inconsistent with normal behavior.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein an anomaly has properties including severity and degree of inconsistency from normal behavior represented by mathematical distance, wherein severity is a class of anomaly assigned by an analytical component that detected and measured the anomaly.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the system detects and signals hazards, wherein a hazard is an unperfected threat associated with an actor without regard to any related assets or the behavior of other actors.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein a hazard represents risk to an enterprise based on cumulative multi-dimensional behaviors comprising anomalous states generated from thresholds, orders of operation, peer-to-peer similarity, and actor behavior change over time.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein a hazard has two properties comprising severity of medium, elevated or high, derived from inherent terrain risks.

13 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the system detects and signals threats, wherein a threat is a perfected threat that ties together actors with behaviors of other actors and assets used by all actors in a hazard collection.

14 . The system of claim 12 , wherein:

threats develop a sequence of operations over a dynamic time-frame; and

threats are connected in a heterogeneous graph comprising nodes and edges, wherein nodes can be actors or assets and edges define the dynamic time-frame as well as the strength of their connection as a function of risk.

15 . A system, comprising:

a series of periodic execution components configured to operate over full or partial sets of received data;

a plurality of event reception components configured to operate on each event in a stream relevant to a terrain and selectively provide information to the series of periodic execution components; and

a threat detector configured to detect threats based on information provided by the series of periodic execution components and the plurality of event reception components;

wherein the system performs defuzzification of multiple qualitative signals into human-centric threat notifications using cognitive computing techniques by detecting and signaling anomalies upon detecting behavior inconsistent with normal behavior.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein an anomaly has properties including severity and degree of inconsistency from normal behavior represented by mathematical distance, wherein severity is a class of anomaly assigned by an analytical component that detected and measured the anomaly.

17 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the system detects and signals hazards, wherein a hazard is an unperfected threat associated with an actor without regard to any related assets or the behavior of other actors.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein a hazard represents risk to an enterprise based on cumulative multi-dimensional behaviors comprising anomalous states generated from thresholds, orders of operation, peer-to-peer similarity, and actor behavior change over time.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein a hazard has two properties comprising severity of medium, elevated or high, derived from inherent terrain risks.

20 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the threat detector operates with the series of periodic execution components and the plurality of event reception components to detect and signal threats, wherein a threat is a perfected threat that ties together actors with behaviors of other actors and assets used by all actors in a hazard collection.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2025
From: BLUEVOYANT LLC; CONQUEST TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC
To: FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 071956/0110 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 18, 2017
From: CORMIER, MICHAEL E; COX, EARL D; THACKREY, WILLIAM E; MCGLYNN, JOSEPH; GAR, HARRY
To: SCIANTA ANALYTICS, LLC
Reel/Frame 043617/0538 →