Engine control strategy
At least some implementations of a method of distinguishing between two loads being driven by an engine, includes the steps of determining engine speed at defined intervals, comparing a second engine speed against a previously determined first engine speed, determining if the second engine speed fits an expected pattern of engine speeds, and counting either the number of incidents where the second engine speed does not fit the expected pattern, or the number of incidents where the second engine speed does fit the expected pattern, or some combination of these two. A method of determining if an engine is operating at least near a lean limit of its air to fuel ratio is also disclosed.
1. A method of distinguishing between two loads being driven by an engine, comprising the steps of:
determining a first engine speed and a second engine speed at defined intervals;
determining if the second engine speed fits an expected pattern of engine speeds relative to the first engine speed; and
counting either the number of incidents where the second engine speed does not fit the expected pattern, or the number of incidents where the second engine speed does fit the expected pattern, or some combination of these two, wherein the defined interval is one engine revolution and wherein the time or speed of each engine revolution is compared to the time or speed for the immediately prior engine revolution and the expected pattern includes alternating faster and slower revolutions.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the engine is a four stroke engine.
3. The method of claim 1 which also includes the step of tallying all counted incidents over a predetermined number of engine revolutions.
4. The method of claim 3 which also includes the step of comparing the tally against stored data, where the stored data includes information relating to at least two engine loads, to determine which of the engine loads is being driven by the engine based on the tally comparison.
5. The method of claim 1 which also includes the step of determining if the engine is being operated near a lean limit for the engine as a function of the counted incidents.
6. The method of claim 1 which also includes comparing the counted number of incidents against stored data, where the stored data includes information relating to at least one engine load, to determine if the one engine load is being driven by the engine or if a different engine load is being driven by the engine based on the comparison.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the stored data relates to at least two engine loads, wherein the at least two engine loads have different mass or different moments of inertia.
8. A method of distinguishing between two loads being driven by an engine, comprising the steps of:
determining a first engine speed for a first engine revolution;
determining a second engine speed for a second engine revolution immediately following the first engine revolution;
determining if the first engine speed and second engine speed fit an expected pattern of engine speeds;
counting, over a predetermined number of engine revolutions, either the number of incidents where the second engine speed does not fit the expected pattern, or the number of incidents where the second engine speed does fit the expected pattern, or some combination of these two.
9. The method of claim 8 which also includes the step of comparing the counted number of incidents against stored data, where the stored data includes information relating to at least one engine load, to determine if the one engine load is being driven by the engine or if a different engine load is being driven by the engine based on the comparison.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the stored data relates to at least two engine loads, wherein the at least two engine loads have different mass or different moments of inertia.