IP Library Granted Patent US 11,075,822
Granted Patent B1
US 11,075,822 · App. 15/784,598 · Granted Jul 27, 2021

System and method for improved performance QoS with service levels and storage groups

Inventors: Owen Martin (Hopedale, MA); Malak Alshawabkeh (Franklin, MA); Benjamin Allen Fitz Randolph (Uxbridge, MA)
Assignee: EMC IP Holding Company, LLC
H04L41/5019H04L43/0852H04L67/1097
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,075,822
App. No.
15/784,598
Granted
Jul 27, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method, computer program product, and computer system for receiving, by a computing device, a first I/O request from a first application in a first storage group assigned to a first storage level. A response time for the first I/O request may be identified. It may be identified that the response time for the first I/O request is outside a pre-determined response time. A delay may be added to a second I/O request received from a second application in a second storage group assigned to a second storage level based upon, at least in part, identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside the pre-determined response time.

Claims (35)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by a computing device, a first I/O request from a first application in a first storage group assigned to a first storage level, wherein the first storage group contains a first plurality of applications sharing a same service level;

identifying a response time for the first I/O request;

identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside a pre-determined response time;

adding a delay to a second I/O request received from a second application in a second storage group assigned to a second storage level based upon, at least in part, identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside the pre-determined response time, wherein the second storage group contains a second plurality of applications sharing a same service level, wherein the service level associated with the first storage group is higher in priority than the service level associated with the second storage group, wherein the delay is applied to the second I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level when a dampening factor applied to the second storage group indicates applying the delay will improve the response time for at least the first I/O request from the first application in the first storage group assigned to a first storage level;

determining that a response time for a third I/O request from the first application in the first storage group assigned to the first storage level is unchanged from the response time for the first I/O request; and

precluding the delay from being added to a fourth I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level based upon, at least in part, determining that the response time for the third I/O request is unchanged from the response time for the first I/O request.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the pre-determined response time includes a minimum response time specified by the first storage level and a maximum response time specified by the first storage level.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein identifying the response time for the first I/O request includes monitoring response times during a pre-determined interval.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein monitoring response times includes comparing two cycles of performance for the first application.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising assigning a maximum delay capable of being added to the second I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising increasing a probability of delay proportionally for each service level lower than the first storage level.

7. A computer program product residing on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon which, when executed across one or more processors, causes at least a portion of the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving, by a computing device, a first I/O request from a first application in a first storage group assigned to a first storage level, wherein the first storage group contains a first plurality of applications sharing a same service level;

identifying a response time for the first I/O request;

identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside a pre-determined response time;

adding a delay to a second I/O request received from a second application in a second storage group assigned to a second storage level based upon, at least in part, identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside the pre-determined response time, wherein the second storage group contains a second plurality of applications sharing a same service level, wherein the service level associated with the first storage group is higher in priority than the service level associated with the second storage group, wherein the delay is applied to the second I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level when a dampening factor applied to the second storage group indicates applying the delay will improve the response time for at least the first I/O request from the first application in the first storage group assigned to a first storage level;

determining that a response time for a third I/O request from the first application in the first storage group assigned to the first storage level is unchanged from the response time for the first I/O request; and

precluding the delay from being added to a fourth I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level based upon, at least in part, determining that the response time for the third I/O request is unchanged from the response time for the first I/O request.

8. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the pre-determined response time includes a minimum response time specified by the first storage level and a maximum response time specified by the first storage level.

9. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein identifying the response time for the first I/O request includes monitoring response times during a pre-determined interval.

10. The computer program product of claim 9 wherein monitoring response times includes comparing two cycles of performance for the first application.

11. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the operations further comprise assigning a maximum delay capable of being added to the second I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level.

12. The computer program product of claim 7 wherein the operations further comprise increasing a probability of delay proportionally for each service level lower than the first storage level.

13. A computing system including one or more processors and one or more memories configured to perform operations comprising:

receiving a first I/O request from a first application in a first storage group assigned to a first storage level, wherein the first storage group contains a first plurality of applications sharing a same service level;

identifying a response time for the first I/O request;

identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside a pre-determined response time;

adding a delay to a second I/O request received from a second application in a second storage group assigned to a second storage level based upon, at least in part, identifying that the response time for the first I/O request is outside the pre-determined response time, wherein the second storage group contains a second plurality of applications sharing a same service level, wherein the service level associated with the first storage group is higher in priority than the service level associated with the second storage group, wherein the delay is applied to the second I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level when a dampening factor applied to the second storage group indicates applying the delay will improve the response time for at least the first I/O request from the first application in the first storage group assigned to a first storage level;

determining that a response time for a third I/O request from the first application in the first storage group assigned to the first storage level is unchanged from the response time for the first I/O request; and

precluding the delay from being added to a fourth I/O request received from the second application in the second storage group assigned to the second storage level based upon, at least in part, determining that the response time for the third I/O request is unchanged from the response time for the first I/O request.

14. The computing system of claim 13 wherein the pre-determined response time includes a minimum response time specified by the first storage level and a maximum response time specified by the first storage level.

15. The computing system of claim 13 wherein identifying the response time for the first I/O request includes monitoring response times during a pre-determined interval.

16. The computing system of claim 15 wherein monitoring response times includes comparing two cycles of performance for the first application.

17. The computing system of claim 13 wherein the operations further comprise increasing a probability of delay proportionally for each service level lower than the first storage level.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053546/0001) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 071642/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (044535/0109) Recorded May 20, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.)
Reel/Frame 060753/0414 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 044535 FRAME 0001 Recorded Nov 2, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 058298/0475 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2020
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053546/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 21, 2019
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049452/0223 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (CREDIT) Recorded Nov 29, 2017
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 044535/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES) Recorded Nov 29, 2017
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 044535/0109 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 16, 2017
From: MARTIN, OWEN; ALSHAWABKEH, MALAK; RANDOLPH, BENJAMIN ALLEN FITZ
To: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 043872/0632 →