IP Library Granted Patent US 10,026,237
Granted Patent B1
US 10,026,237 · App. 15/808,548 · Granted Jul 17, 2018

Shared vehicle usage, monitoring and feedback

Inventors: Brian Mark Fields (Normal, IL); Steven C. Cielocha (Bloomington, IL); Jacob J. Alt (Downs, IL); Laura Anne Uphoff (Normal, IL); Leo Nelson Chan (Normal, IL); Mohamed A. Wazeer (Normal, IL); Kristopher Keith Gaudin (Bloomington, IL); Justin Davis (Normal, IL); Nathan W. Baumann (Bloomington, IL); Giles Roll (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G07C5/008G07C5/02G07C5/0816
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,026,237
App. No.
15/808,548
Granted
Jul 17, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods for monitoring the use of a shared vehicle are described. In various aspects, telematics data regarding operation of a shared vehicle is collected from one or more sensors, where the shared vehicle is associated with a shared vehicle operator and a shared vehicle stakeholder. One or more processors determine whether a driving event has occurred based upon the telematics data, where the driving event is indicative of improper usage of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator. The one or more processors generate a notification regarding the driving event. The notification includes a driver rating determined from the telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator. The notification is transmitted, via a network, to the shared vehicle stakeholder for presentation to the shared vehicle stakeholder.

Claims (35)

1. A computer-implemented method of monitoring use of a shared vehicle, comprising:

collecting, from one or more sensors associated with a shared vehicle, telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle, the shared vehicle associated a shared vehicle operator and a shared vehicle stakeholder;

determining, by the one or more processors, that a driving event has occurred based upon the telematics data, wherein the driving event is indicative of improper usage of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator;

generating, by the one or more processors, a notification regarding the driving event, the notification including a driver rating determined from the telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator; and

transmitting, via a network, the notification to the shared vehicle stakeholder for presentation to the shared vehicle stakeholder.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying, by the one or more processors, the shared vehicle operator based upon data received from one or more of the following: a mobile computing device associated with the shared vehicle operator or one or more sensors associated with the shared vehicle.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising associating the telematics data with a time period of vehicle usage and associating the time period of vehicle usage with the shared vehicle operator.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more sensors associated with the shared vehicle include one or more sensors disposed within a mobile computing device associated with the shared vehicle operator located within the shared vehicle during vehicle operation.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the improper usage includes improper driving behavior determined based upon the telematics data, such improper driving behavior including one or more of the following: excessive acceleration, excessive speed, hard braking, sharp turning, rolling stops, tailgating, lane departure, swerving, or approaching too near to another vehicle during operation of the shared vehicle.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the improper usage includes improper driving behavior determined based upon the telematics data, such improper driving behavior including one or more of the following: use of a mobile telephone during vehicle operation or excessive duration of vehicle operation during a reference period of time.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the improper usage includes prohibited vehicle usage by the shared vehicle operator determined based upon the telematics data, such prohibited vehicle usage including one or more of the following: operation of the shared vehicle during prohibited time periods, operation of the shared vehicle outside an approved geographic area, or exceeding a maximum allowable duration for a vehicle trip associated with the shared vehicle.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein generation of the notification includes a report regarding the operation of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the notification includes an alert to the shared vehicle stakeholder indicating the driving event, and the notification is transmitted to the shared vehicle stakeholder while vehicle operation by the shared vehicle operator is ongoing.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the alert indicates an urgency level associated with the driving event based upon a risk of an occurrence of a vehicle accident associated with the improper usage.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, via the network, a feedback message from the shared vehicle stakeholder; and presenting, by one or more output devices within the vehicle, the feedback message to the shared vehicle operator during vehicle operation.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the shared vehicle stakeholder is one or more of the following: an owner of the shared vehicle or a fleet manager of the shared vehicle.

13. A computer system for monitoring use of a shared vehicle, comprising:

one or more sensors associated with a shared vehicle, the shared vehicle associated a shared vehicle operator and a shared vehicle stakeholder;

one or more processors;

a program memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computer system to:

collect telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle from the one or more sensors associated with the shared vehicle;

determine, by the one or more processors, that a driving event has occurred based upon the telematics data, wherein the driving event is indicative of improper usage of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator;

generate, by the one or more processors, a notification regarding the driving event, the notification including a driver rating determined from the telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator; and

transmit, via a network, the notification to the shared vehicle stakeholder for presentation to the shared vehicle stakeholder.

14. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more sensors associated with the shared vehicle include one or more sensors disposed within a mobile computing device associated with the shared vehicle operator located within the shared vehicle during vehicle operation.

15. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the improper usage includes improper driving behavior determined based upon the telematics data, such improper driving behavior including one or more of the following: excessive acceleration, excessive speed, hard braking, sharp turning, rolling stops, tailgating, lane departure, swerving, approaching too near to another vehicle during operation of the shared vehicle, use of a mobile telephone during vehicle operation, or excessive duration of vehicle operation during a reference period of time.

16. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the improper usage includes prohibited vehicle usage by the shared vehicle operator determined based upon the telematics data, such prohibited usage including one or more of the following: operation of the shared vehicle during prohibited time periods, operation of the shared vehicle outside an approved geographic area, or exceeding a maximum allowable duration for a vehicle trip associated with the shared vehicle.

17. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the notification includes an alert to the shared vehicle stakeholder indicating the driving event, and the notification is transmitted to the shared vehicle stakeholder while vehicle operation by the shared vehicle operator is ongoing.

18. The computer system of claim 17 , wherein the alert indicates an urgency level associated with the driving event based upon a risk of an occurrence of a vehicle accident associated with the improper usage.

19. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the program memory further stores instructions that further cause the computer system to receive a feedback message from the shared vehicle stakeholder via the communication network, and to present the feedback message to the shared vehicle operator during vehicle operation.

20. A tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for monitoring use of a shared vehicle that, when executed by one or more processors of a computer system, cause the computer system to:

collect, via one or more sensors associated with a shared vehicle, telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle, the shared vehicle associated a shared vehicle operator and a shared vehicle stakeholder;

determine, by the one or more processors, that a driving event has occurred based upon the telematics data, wherein the driving event is indicative of improper usage of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator;

generate, by the one or more processors, a notification regarding the driving event, the notification including a driver rating determined from the telematics data regarding operation of the shared vehicle by the shared vehicle operator; and

transmit, via a network, the notification to the shared vehicle stakeholder for presentation to the shared vehicle stakeholder.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2023
From: HYUNDAI; KIA
To: HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; KIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062290/0655 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2022
From: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
To: HYUNDAI; KIA
Reel/Frame 062190/0037 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2017
From: FIELDS, BRIAN MARK; CIELOCHA, STEVEN C.; ALT, JACOB J.; UPHOFF, LAURA A.; CHAN, LEO NELSON; WAZEER, MOHAMED A.; GAUDIN, KRISTOPHER KEITH; DAVIS, JUSTIN; BAUMANN, NATHAN W.; ROLL, GILES
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 044129/0960 →
Continuity (15)
Continuation 15241826 · Aug 19, 2016
Provisional Application 62369537 · Aug 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62369531 · Aug 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62369577 · Aug 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62369552 · Aug 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62369563 · Aug 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62367470 · Jul 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62367467 · Jul 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62367466 · Jul 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62367460 · Jul 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62367474 · Jul 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62367479 · Jul 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62296839 · Feb 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62262671 · Dec 3, 2015
Provisional Application 62211337 · Aug 28, 2015
Cited By (16)
US 12,248,981 US 12,259,726 US 12,291,196 US 12,313,414 US 12,345,536 US 12,358,463 US 12,359,927 US 12,361,769 US 12,365,308 US 12,457,491 US 12,499,457 US 12,505,488 US 12,524,219 US 12,534,072 US 12,612,050 US 12,612,051