IP Library Granted Patent US 10,560,854
Granted Patent B2
US 10,560,854 · App. 15/834,423 · Granted Feb 11, 2020

Optimizing performance between a wireless distribution system (WDS) and a macro network(s)

Inventors: Igor Berlin (Potomac, MD); Dror Harel (Hod Hasharon, IL); Yair Zeev Shapira (Shoham, IL)
Assignee: Corning Optical Communications LLC
H04W24/02H04L41/0823H04L41/5009H04L41/5025H04L41/5067H04W24/10H04W52/243
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,560,854
App. No.
15/834,423
Granted
Feb 11, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Optimizing performance between a wireless distribution system (WDS) and a macro network(s). In this regard, a macro network optimization system is configured to detect a performance indicator(s) between a WDS and a macro network and optimize the performance of the macro network based on the detected performance indicator(s). The macro network optimization system analyzes a macro network performance report provided by the macro network and/or a WDS performance report provided by the WDS to detect the performance indicator(s) between the WDS and the macro network. The macro network optimization system reconfigures operations of one or more macro network elements to optimize performance between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected performance indicator(s). By detecting and optimizing performance between the WDS and the macro network, capacity, throughput, and/or coverage of the WDS and the macro network can be improved, thus providing better quality of experience (QoE).

Claims (61)

1. A macro network optimization system for optimizing performance in a macro network communicatively coupled to a wireless distribution system (WDS), the macro network optimization system configured to:

receive a WDS performance report from the WDS;

analyze the WDS performance report to determine at least one performance indicator between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfigure one or more macro network elements to optimize the performance between the WDS and the macro network based on the at least one performance indicator determined between the WDS and the macro network.

2. The macro network optimization system of claim 1 , wherein the WDS performance report comprises at least one information element selected from the group consisting of: a radio frequency (RF) signal information; a quality of experience (QoE) report; and a cell trace data generated by one or more WDS elements.

3. The macro network optimization system of claim 2 , wherein the at least one performance indicator between the WDS and the macro network is indicative of WDS originated RF interference and macro network originated RF interference.

4. The macro network optimization system of claim 3 , wherein the macro network optimization system is configured to:

analyze the WDS performance report from the WDS to determine if the at least one performance indicator indicates that RF interference exists between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfigure the one or more macro network elements to reduce the RF interference that is determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

5. The macro network optimization system of claim 4 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one outdoor base station; and

reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station in the macro network to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one outdoor base station.

6. The macro network optimization system of claim 5 , further configured to tilt an antenna in the at least one outdoor base station to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

7. The macro network optimization system of claim 5 , further configured to cause the at least one outdoor base station to change radiation pattern to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

8. The macro network optimization system of claim 5 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

9. The macro network optimization system of claim 8 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

10. The macro network optimization system of claim 5 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one outdoor client device; and

reconfigure the at least one outdoor client device in the macro network to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one outdoor client device.

11. The macro network optimization system of claim 10 , further configured to cause the at least one outdoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

12. The macro network optimization system of claim 10 , further configured to cause the at least one outdoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

13. The macro network optimization system of claim 5 , further configured to receive a macro network performance report from the macro network.

14. The macro network optimization system of claim 13 , further configured to analyze the macro network performance report to determine if the at least one performance indicator indicates that radio frequency (RF) interference exists between the WDS and the macro network.

15. The macro network optimization system of claim 14 , further configured to reconfigure one or more WDS elements to reduce the RF interference that is determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

16. The macro network optimization system of claim 15 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one remote unit in the WDS; and

reconfigure the at least one remote unit in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one remote unit.

17. The macro network optimization system of claim 16 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to change radiation pattern to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

18. The macro network optimization system of claim 16 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

19. The macro network optimization system of claim 16 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

20. The macro network optimization system of claim 15 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one indoor client device; and

reconfigure the at least one indoor client device in the macro network to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one indoor client device.

21. The macro network optimization system of claim 20 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

22. The macro network optimization system of claim 20 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

23. The macro network optimization system of claim 13 , wherein the macro network optimization system is configured to analyze the macro network performance report and the WDS performance report to determine if radio frequency (RF) interference exists between the WDS and the macro network.

24. The macro network optimization system of claim 23 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one outdoor base station; and

reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station in the macro network to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one outdoor base station.

25. The macro network optimization system of claim 24 , further configured to tilt an antenna in the at least one outdoor base station to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

26. The macro network optimization system of claim 24 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station to change radiation pattern to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

27. The macro network optimization system of claim 24 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

28. The macro network optimization system of claim 24 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor base station to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

29. The macro network optimization system of claim 23 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one outdoor client device; and

reconfigure the at least one outdoor client device in the macro network to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one outdoor client device.

30. The macro network optimization system of claim 29 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

31. The macro network optimization system of claim 29 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one outdoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

32. The macro network optimization system of claim 23 , wherein the macro network performance report comprises at least one information element selected from the group consisting of: a cell trace data; a quality of experience (QoE) report; a geo-location data; and cell statistics generated by the one or more macro network elements.

33. The macro network optimization system of claim 23 , further configured to reconfigure one or more WDS elements to reduce the RF interference that is determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

34. The macro network optimization system of claim 33 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one remote unit in the WDS; and

reconfigure the at least one remote unit in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one remote unit.

35. The macro network optimization system of claim 34 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to change radiation pattern to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

36. The macro network optimization system of claim 34 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

37. The macro network optimization system of claim 34 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

38. The macro network optimization system of claim 33 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one indoor client device; and

reconfigure the at least one indoor client device in the macro network to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one indoor client device.

39. The macro network optimization system of claim 38 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

40. The macro network optimization system of claim 38 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2025
From: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
To: ANI ACQUISITION SUB, LLC
Reel/Frame 071270/0328 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 12, 2019
From: BERLIN, IGOR; HAREL, DROR; SHAPIRA, YAIR ZEEV
To: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 049441/0667 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 22, 2019
From: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS LTD
To: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 048411/0787 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation In Part PCTIL2016050809 · Jul 24, 2016
Provisional Application 62251939 · Nov 6, 2015
Provisional Application 62245499 · Oct 23, 2015
Provisional Application 62196579 · Jul 24, 2015
Related Publication 20180103383A1 · Apr 12, 2018