IP Library Granted Patent US 10,012,993
Granted Patent B1
US 10,012,993 · App. 15/835,284 · Granted Jul 3, 2018

Method and system for risk modeling in autonomous vehicles

Inventors: Jonathan Matus (San Francisco, CA); Pankaj Risbood (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Zendrive, Inc.
G05D1/0214B60W40/09G05D1/0088G08G1/0112G08G1/096725B64C39/02B64C39/024G05D2201/0213G06Q40/08G08G5/00G08G5/003
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,012,993
App. No.
15/835,284
Granted
Jul 3, 2018
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method for adaptive risk modeling for an autonomous vehicle, the method comprising: retrieving parameters of an identified driving mission of the autonomous vehicle; in response to the parameters of the identified driving mission, generating values of: a comparative autonomous parameter, a mix model parameter, a surrounding risk parameter, a geographic operation parameter, and a security risk parameter upon evaluating situational inputs associated with the identified driving mission with a comparative autonomous model, a mix model, a sensor-surrounding model, a geography-dependent model, and a security risk model generated using sensor and supplementary data extraction systems associated with the autonomous vehicle; upon generating values, generating a risk analysis with a rule-based algorithm; and contemporaneously with execution of the identified driving mission, implementing a response action associated with control of the autonomous vehicle, based upon the risk analysis.

Claims (38)

1. A method for adaptive risk modeling for an autonomous vehicle, the method comprising:

with sensor systems associated with the autonomous vehicle, generating:

a comparative autonomous model that compares autonomous vehicle operation to human driving operation in a set of driving scenarios,

a mix model characterizing operation of the autonomous vehicle in mixed-traffic driving scenarios,

a sensor-surrounding model characterizing surroundings of the autonomous vehicle;

with a supplementary data extraction system, generating:

a geography-dependent model characterizing geographic location-specific acceptable driving behaviors;

with a security diagnostic system associated with the autonomous vehicle, generating a security risk model characterizing security risks of the autonomous vehicle;

in response to an identified driving mission of the autonomous vehicle, generating values of: a comparative autonomous parameter, a mix model parameter, a surrounding risk parameter, a geographic operation parameter, and a security risk parameter upon evaluating situational inputs associated with the identified driving mission with the comparative autonomous model, the mix model, the sensor-surrounding model, the geography-dependent model, and the security risk model;

upon generating values, generating a risk analysis upon processing values of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter with a rule-based algorithm; and

contemporaneously with execution of the identified driving mission, implementing a response action associated with control of the autonomous vehicle, based upon the risk analysis.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the comparative autonomous model comprises extracting at least one of a position characteristic, a velocity characteristic, and an acceleration characteristic from sensor systems associated with the autonomous vehicle during operation by a human entity and a non-human entity.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the sensor-surrounding model comprises extracting an environmental dataset from an environment-sensing sensor system associated with the autonomous vehicle, and evaluating a set of specifications of the autonomous vehicle against features of the environmental dataset to determine appropriateness of the autonomous vehicle for the identified driving mission.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the mix model comprises extracting a mixed traffic dataset characterizing interactions of the vehicle with a set of traffic types from a set of sensors, and tagging the mixed traffic dataset with mixed traffic event objects.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the geography-dependent model comprises establishing a first interface between the autonomous vehicle and a control system in communication with a computing system and a second interface between the computing system and the supplementary data extraction system.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein processing at least one of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter is based on combination of model outputs for improving accuracy of the risk analysis.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein combination of model outputs comprises determining a first weight associated with at least one of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter; determining a second weight associated with at least one of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter; and combining parameter values based on the first and the second weights for improving the accuracy of the risk analysis.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein implementing the response action associated with control of the autonomous vehicle comprises generating and executing control instructions for modified operation of the autonomous vehicle using control interfaces with subsystems of the autonomous vehicle.

9. A method for adaptive risk modeling for an autonomous vehicle, the method comprising:

retrieving parameters of an identified driving mission of the autonomous vehicle;

in response to the parameters of the identified driving mission, generating values of: a comparative autonomous parameter, a mix model parameter, a surrounding risk parameter, a geographic operation parameter, and a security risk parameter upon evaluating situational inputs associated with the identified driving mission with a comparative autonomous model, a mix model, a sensor-surrounding model, a geography-dependent model, and a security risk model generated using sensor and supplementary data extraction systems associated with the autonomous vehicle;

upon generating values, generating a risk analysis upon processing values of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter with a rule-based algorithm; and

contemporaneously with execution of the identified driving mission, implementing a response action associated with control of the autonomous vehicle, based upon the risk analysis.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: with sensor systems associated with the autonomous vehicle, generating:

the comparative autonomous model that compares autonomous vehicle operation to human driving operation in a set of driving scenarios,

the mix model characterizing operation of the autonomous vehicle in mixed-traffic driving scenarios, and

the sensor-surrounding model characterizing surroundings of the autonomous vehicle.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein generating the comparative autonomous model comprises extracting at least one of a position characteristic, a velocity characteristic, and an acceleration characteristic from sensor systems associated with the autonomous vehicle during operation by a human entity and a non-human entity.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein generating the mix model comprises extracting a mixed traffic dataset characterizing interactions of the vehicle with a set of traffic types from a set of sensors, and tagging the mixed traffic dataset with mixed traffic event objects.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising: with a supplementary data extraction system, generating the geography-dependent model characterizing geographic location-specific acceptable driving behaviors.

14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising with a security diagnostic system coupled to the autonomous vehicle, generating the security risk model characterizing security risks of the autonomous vehicle.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein retrieving parameters of the identified driving mission of the autonomous vehicle comprises receiving an input sourced from at least one of a passenger and an operator of the autonomous vehicle, the input indicative of a destination.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein processing at least one of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter is based on weighted combination of model outputs for improving accuracy of the risk analysis.

17. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

obtaining a set of computer-implemented rules defining the at least one of the comparative autonomous parameter, the mix model parameter, the surrounding risk parameter, the geographic operation parameter, and the security risk parameter as a function of risk feature types associated with outputs of at least one of the comparative autonomous model, the mix model, the sensor-surrounding model, the geography-dependent model, and the security risk model; and

wherein generating the risk analysis comprises generating the risk analysis based on the set of computer-implemented rules.

18. The method of claim 9 , wherein implementing the response action associated with control of the autonomous vehicle comprises generating and executing control instructions for modified operation of the autonomous vehicle using control interfaces with subsystems of the autonomous vehicle.

19. The method of claim 9 , wherein implementing the response action associated with control of the autonomous vehicle comprises transmitting the risk analysis to a vehicle control platform, and modifying, from the vehicle control platform, operational rules of units of the autonomous vehicle.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2024
From: ZENDRIVE, INC.
To: CREDIT KARMA, LLC
Reel/Frame 068584/0017 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF IP SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 16, 2024
From: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
To: ZENDRIVE, INC.
Reel/Frame 068383/0870 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 16, 2021
From: ZENDRIVE, INC.
To: TRINITY CAPITAL INC.
Reel/Frame 056896/0460 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 15, 2018
From: MATUS, JONATHAN; RISBOOD, PANKAJ
To: ZENDRIVE, INC.
Reel/Frame 044622/0150 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 62431949 · Dec 9, 2016
Cited By (13)
US 12,192,865 US 12,204,343 US 12,205,420 US 12,230,073 US 12,258,008 US 12,379,726 US 12,400,272 US 12,472,957 US 12,481,574 US 12,483,869 US 12,524,040 US 12,578,734 US 12,610,210