IP Library Granted Patent US 10,803,298
Granted Patent B2
US 10,803,298 · App. 15/861,982 · Granted Oct 13, 2020

High precision additive pattern recognition for image and other applications

Inventor: Omer Moshe Moussaffi (Haifa, IL)
Assignee: Shutterfly, LLC
G06K9/00288G06F17/16G06K9/00677G06K9/6256G06K9/6269
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,803,298
App. No.
15/861,982
Granted
Oct 13, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method includes selecting a kernel and kernel parameters for a first Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, testing the first SVM model on a feature matrix T of n feature vectors of length m to produce false positive (FP) data set and false negative (FN) data set by a computer processor, wherein n and m are integer numbers, automatically removing feature vectors corresponding to the FN data set from the feature matrix T by the computer processor to produce a feature matrix T_best of size (n-size(FN))*m, retraining the first SVM model on the feature matrix T_best to produce a second SVM model, and checking if a ratio (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) is above a threshold for the second SVM model on T_best. If the ratio is above the threshold, SVM predictions is performed using the second SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

Claims (35)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

selecting a kernel and kernel parameters for a first Support Vector Machine (SVM) model;

testing the first SVM model on a feature matrix T to produce false positive (FP) data set and false negative (FN) data set by a computer processor, wherein the feature matrix T includes n feature vectors of length m, wherein n and m are integer numbers;

automatically removing feature vectors corresponding to the FN data set from the feature matrix T by the computer processor to produce a feature matrix T_best of size (n-size(FN))*m;

retraining the first SVM model on the feature matrix T_best to produce a second SVM model;

checking if a ratio (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) is above a threshold for the second SVM model on T_best; and

if the ratio is above the threshold, performing SVM predictions using the second SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

if the ratio (T_best sample number)/(SVM model support vector number) is not above the threshold for the SVM model on T_best, repeating selecting, testing, automatically removing, retraining, and checking to find a third SVM model having (T_best sample number)/(SVM model support vector number) ratio that exceeds the threshold.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

performing SVM predictions using the third SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

if a SVM model having (T_best sample number)/(SVM model support vector number) ratio that exceeds the threshold is not found, selecting a fourth SVM model that yields a highest (T_best sample number)/(SVM model support vector number) ratio in repeating selecting, testing, automatically removing, retraining, and checking; and

performing SVM predictions using the fourth SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold for the (T_best sample number)/(SVM model support vector number) ratio is ten or higher.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying Grid Search on the feature matrix T to find optimal kernel parameters before testing the first SVM model on a feature matrix T.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the feature vectors are based on faces or objects in images, the computer-implemented method further comprising:

classifying the objects and the faces in the images by performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_best.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , further comprising:

automatically creating designs for photo products based on the objects and faces classified by performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_best.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting a feature vector v from the FN data set to add back to the feature matrix T_best to produce a feature matrix T_v;

retraining the second SVM model on the feature matrix T_v to produce a fifth SVM model;

performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_v using the fifth SVM model;

calculating a benefit function to produce a benefit function value, wherein the benefit function is dependent of differences between true positives, true negatives, and numbers of support vectors generated on T_best and T_v respectively by the second SVM model and the fifth SVM model;

adding the feature vector v to T_best if the benefit function value meets a predetermined criterion; and

performing SVM prediction using the feature matrix T_best.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising:

repeating selecting a feature vector v, training the second SVM model, performing SVM predictions, calculating a benefit function, and adding the feature vector v to T_best by selecting and adding a different feature vector from the FN data set to feature matrix T_best,

wherein SVM predictions are performed using the feature matrix T_best that gives a highest best function value.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein all the feature vectors corresponding to the FN data set are evaluated by calculating a corresponding benefic function and determined to be added to the T_best or not depending on a value of the corresponding benefic function.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the feature vector v is not added to the feature matrix T_best if the value of the benefit function does not meet the predetermined criterion.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the feature vectors are based on faces or objects in images, the computer-implemented method further comprising:

classifying the objects and the faces in the images by performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_best.

Assignments (5)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 22, 2019
From: SHUTTERFLY, INC.
To: SHUTTERFLY, LLC
Reel/Frame 051095/0172 →
FIRST LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 27, 2019
From: SHUTTERFLY, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 050574/0865 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: SHUTTERFLY, INC.; LIFETOUCH INC.; LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS INC.
Reel/Frame 050527/0868 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2019
From: MOUSSAFFI, OMER MOSHE
To: SHUTTERFLY, INC.
Reel/Frame 049159/0383 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 23, 2018
From: SHUTTERFLY, INC.; LIFETOUCH INC.; LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 046216/0396 →