IP Library Granted Patent US 10,589,118
Granted Patent B2
US 10,589,118 · App. 15/874,784 · Granted Mar 17, 2020

Enhanced spatial summation for deep-brain transcranial magnetic stimulation

Inventor: M. Bret Schneider (Portola Valley, CA)
Assignees: BRAINSWAY LTD.; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
A61N2/02A61N2/006A61N2/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,589,118
App. No.
15/874,784
Granted
Mar 17, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods of stimulating a target deep brain region using multiple Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) electromagnets positioned over a predetermined cortical regions each having a first-order connection to a target deep brain region and applying TMS so that the applied TMS induces spatial summation and thereby modulation of the target deep brain region.

Claims (23)

1. A method of stimulating a target deep brain region, the method comprising:

positioning a first Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) electromagnetic over a first predetermined cortical region having a first-order connection to the target deep brain region;

positioning a second TMS electromagnetic over a second predetermined cortical region having a first-order connection to the target deep brain region;

stimulating the first and second predetermined cortical regions by applying TMS from both the first and second TMS electromagnets; and

stimulating the target deep brain region by spatial summation of signals received at the target deep brain region from the stimulated first and second predetermined cortical regions.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising positioning a third TMS electromagnet over a third predetermined cortical region having a first-order connection to the target deep brain region.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of applying TMS comprises synchronizing the applied TMS from the first and second TMS electromagnets.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of positioning the first and second TMS electromagnets comprises positioning discrete one coil or two coil TMS electromagnets.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of applying TMS comprises applying TMS only locally to the predetermined cortical regions, rather than the entire brain.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising directly stimulating the target deep brain region concurrent with the TMS of the first and second predetermined cortical brain regions.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising treating a patient for depression, addiction, or pain.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the target deep brain region comprises one of: thalamus, cingulate, putamen, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, ventral striatum, and amygdala.

9. A method of treating a patient for a disorder by stimulating a target deep brain region, the method comprising:

positioning a plurality of discrete Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) electromagnets over a plurality of predetermined cortical regions each having a first-order connection to a target deep brain region;

stimulating each of the plurality of predetermined cortical regions by applying TMS to each of the plurality of predetermined cortical regions from each corresponding TMS electromagnet; and

treating the patient by receiving spatial summation of signals at the deep brain region received from the plurality of predetermined cortical regions.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the treating comprises synchronizing the applied TMS from the plurality of TMS electromagnets.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein positioning comprises positioning a first TMS electromagnet coil and a second TMS electromagnet coil.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein treating comprises applying TMS only locally to the predetermined cortical regions, rather than the entire brain.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising directly stimulating the target deep brain region concurrent with the TMS of the predetermined cortical regions.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein treating comprises treating the patient for depression, addiction, or pain.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the target deep brain region comprises one of: thalamus, cingulate, putamen, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, ventral striatum, and amygdala.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein treating the patient by receiving spatial summation of signals at the deep brain region received from the plurality of predetermined cortical regions includes stimulating the deep brain region by spatial summation of signals received at the deep brain region from stimulating each of the plurality of predetermined cortical regions.

Assignments (12)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CONVEYING PARTY PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 048314 FRAME: 0415. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 8, 2019
From: MISHELEVICH, DAVID J.; SCHNEIDER, M. BRET
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 050305/0036 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2019
From: RIO GRANDE NEUROSCIENCES, INC.
To: TMS INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 049375/0224 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2019
From: TMS INNOVATIONS, LLC
To: BRAINSWAY LTD.
Reel/Frame 049375/0611 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 4, 2019
From: SCHNEIDER, M. BRET
To: RIO GRANDE NEUROSCIENCES, INC.; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 049364/0301 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2019
From: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Reel/Frame 048564/0624 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: NEOSTIM, INC.
To: CERVEL NEUROTECH, INC.
Reel/Frame 048314/0262 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: CERVEL NEUROTECH, INC.
To: CERVEL (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
Reel/Frame 048314/0303 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: CERVEL (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
To: RIO GRANDE NEUROSCIENCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 048314/0342 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: RIO GRANDE NEUROSCIENCES, INC.
To: SCHNEIDER, M. BRET
Reel/Frame 048314/0355 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: SCHNEIDER, M. BRET
To: RIO GRANDE NEUROSCIENCES, INC.; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 048314/0377 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: SCHNEIDER, M. BRET
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 048314/0415 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2019
From: SCHNEIDER, M. BRET
To: NEOSTIM, INC.
Reel/Frame 048314/0230 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 15169564 · May 31, 2016
Continuation 13169967 · Jun 27, 2011
Continuation In Part 12324227 · Nov 26, 2008
Continuation In Part 11429504 · May 5, 2006
Provisional Application 61358847 · Jun 25, 2010
Related Publication 20180154165A1 · Jun 7, 2018
Cited By (5)
US 12,246,172 US 12,329,968 US 12,357,811 US 12,409,316 US 12,453,854