IP Library Granted Patent US 10,255,777
Granted Patent B1
US 10,255,777 · App. 15/885,062 · Granted Apr 9, 2019

Systems and methods for dynamic field reduction based on a measured distance between a tag and a tag deactivator

Inventors: Manuel Soto (Lake Worth, FL); Hubert A. Patterson (Boca Raton, FL); Adam S. Bergman (Boca Raton, FL)
Assignee: Sensormatic Electronics, LLC
G08B13/2411G08B13/242G08B13/2462G08B13/2465
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,255,777
App. No.
15/885,062
Granted
Apr 9, 2019
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods for deactivating an Electronic Article Surveillance (“EAS”) security tag coupled to an item. The methods comprise: detecting a presence of the EAS security tag in proximity to a tag deactivator; determining a distance between the item and at least one deactivation coil of the tag deactivator, in response to a detection of the EAS security tag; dynamically adjusting a deactivation field strength setting of the tag deactivator based on the distance that was previously determined; and using the at least one deactivation coil to generate a deactivation field in accordance with the deactivation field strength setting which was previously dynamically adjusted.

Claims (36)

1. A method for deactivating an EAS security tag coupled to an item, comprising:

detecting a presence of the EAS security tag in proximity to a tag deactivator;

determining a distance between the item and at least one deactivation coil of the tag deactivator, in response to a detection of the EAS security tag;

dynamically adjusting a deactivation field strength setting of the tag deactivator based on the distance that was previously determined; and

using the at least one deactivation coil to generate a deactivation field in accordance with the deactivation field strength setting which was previously dynamically adjusted.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising reading a barcode coupled to the item before, after or simultaneously with the detecting.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the distance is determined using distance measurement data from a distance measurement device provided with the tag deactivator.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the distance is determined based on tag field strength information from the at least one deactivation coil.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the distance is further determined using field pattern null information from the at least one deactivation coil.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one deactivation coil is located in a first plane that is horizontal to ground or is located in a second plane that is vertical to ground.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one deactivation coil comprises a first coil located in a first plane that is horizontal to ground and a second coil located in a second plane that is vertical to ground.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one deactivation coil comprises a first portion located in a first plane that is horizontal to ground and a second portion located in a second plane that is vertical to ground.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the deactivation field strength setting comprises a voltage setting for a capacitor connected to the at least one deactivation coil.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein a value for the voltage setting is computed based on the distance.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the value for the voltage setting is computed in accordance with the following Mathematical Equation

V ( z ):=(AmpTurns( z,w,l )·Freq( G,N )· L ( N ))/( N·eD )

where V(z) represents a voltage value to be applied to the capacitor when the item is at a distance z, AmpTurns(z,w,l) represents an Amp-turn peak product at a distance z (which is proportional to a field level as a function of coil size (w,l)), Freq(G,N) represents a resonant frequency as a function of wire gauge (G) and coil turns (N), L represents a coil inductance as a function of coil turns (N), N represents a number of coil turns, and eD represents an exponential decay factor of resonant discharge.

12. A system, comprising:

a tag detector configured to detect a presence of an Electronic Article Surveillance (“EAS”) security tag in proximity thereto; and

a tag deactivator comprising

a processor; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising programming instructions that are configured to cause the processor to implement a method for deactivating the EAS security tag, wherein the programming instructions comprise instructions to:

determine a distance between an item to which the EAS security tag is coupled and at least one deactivation coil of the tag deactivator, in response to the tag detector's detection of the EAS security tag;

dynamically adjust a deactivation field strength setting based on the distance that was previously determined; and

at least one deactivation coil to generate a deactivation field in accordance with the deactivation field strength setting which was previously dynamically adjusted.

13. The system according to claim 12 , further comprising a barcode reader configured to read a barcode coupled to the item before, after or simultaneously with the EAS security tag's detection.

14. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the distance is determined using distance measurement data from a distance measurement device provided with the tag deactivator.

15. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the distance is determined based on tag field strength information from the at least one deactivation coil.

16. The system according to claim 15 , wherein the distance is further determined using field pattern null information from the at least one deactivation coil.

17. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one deactivation coil is located in a first plane that is horizontal to ground or is located in a second plane that is vertical to ground.

18. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the at least one deactivation coil comprises a first coil located in a first plane that is horizontal to ground and a second coil located in a second plane that is vertical to ground.

19. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the deactivation field strength setting comprises a voltage setting for a capacitor connected to the at least one deactivation coil.

20. The system according to claim 19 , wherein a value for the voltage setting is computed based on the distance.

21. The system according to claim 20 , wherein the value for the voltage setting is computed in accordance with the following Mathematical Equation

V ( z ):=(AmpTurns( z,w,l )·Freq( G,N )· L ( N ))/( N·eD )

where V(z) represents a voltage value to be applied to the capacitor when the item is at a distance z, AmpTurns(z,w,l) represents an Amp-turn peak product at a distance z (which is proportional to a field level as a function of coil size (w,l)), Freq(G,N) represents a resonant frequency as a function of wire gauge (G) and coil turns (N), L represents a coil inductance as a function of coil turns (N), N represents a number of coil turns, and eD represents an exponential decay factor of resonant discharge.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 3, 2018
From: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
To: SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS, LLC
Reel/Frame 047188/0715 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2018
From: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
To: SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS, LLC
Reel/Frame 047182/0674 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 31, 2018
From: SOTO, MANUEL; PATTERSON, HUBERT A.; BERGMAN, ADAM S.
To: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 044787/0659 →
Cited By (2)
US 12,454,851 US 12,638,584