IP Library Patent Application 15893152
Patent Application
App. No. 15/893,152

MAGNETIC ROBOT CALIBRATION

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/893,152
Abstract

Aspects of the present disclosure relate to magnetic robot calibration. As an example, a robot may engage in a calibration process based at least in part on data samples from a magnetometer. The robot may use the data samples to determine a reference point, with which the robot may process movement instructions accordingly. In some examples, a user device may be used to control the robot, and may comprise a magnetometer for determining a reference point similar to that of the robot. As a result, the user device may communicate with the robot using movement instructions that are based on the reference point determined at the user device, such that the robot may perform the movement instructions using the reference point determined at the robot.

Claims (46)

1 . A system for magnetic calibration of a robot, comprising:

at least one processor; and

memory encoding computer executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, perform a method comprising:

collecting a set of data samples from a magnetometer while the robot rotates;

generating a sinusoidal function associated with the set of data samples;

determining a reference point using the sinusoidal function, wherein the reference point is associated with a rotation angle of the robot at a critical point of the sinusoidal function;

receiving a movement instruction from a user device, wherein the movement instruction comprises a heading; and

performing the movement instruction by evaluating the heading using the reference point.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein collecting the set of data samples from the magnetometer further comprises associating the samples with data from an inertial measurement unit.

3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the rotation angle of the robot at the critical point is measured by the inertial measurement unit.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the method further comprises recalibrating the inertial measurement unit based on the reference point.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the rotation angle is stored as an offset, and wherein evaluating the heading using the reference point comprises evaluating the heading based on the offset.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the method further comprises:

receiving a calibration request from a user device; and

in response to the calibration request; providing the offset to the user device.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein generating the sinusoidal function associated with the set of data samples comprises at least one of:

removing noise from the set of data samples; and

performing a smoothing operation on the set of data samples.

8 . A computer-implemented method for controlling a robot, comprising:

providing a calibration indication to a robot, wherein the calibration indication causes the robot to determine a first reference point for the robot;

determining, at a user device, a second reference point based on a magnetometer of the user device;

generating a movement instruction for the robot based on a user input, wherein the movement instruction comprises a heading based on the second reference point; and

providing the generated movement instruction to the robot.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the user input comprises at least one of a speed for the robot and a direction for the robot.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving, in response to providing the calibration indication, an offset from the robot.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the movement instruction is generated based on the received offset.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the second reference point is determined based on a rotation angle from an inertial measurement unit.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the first reference point and the second reference point correspond to a similar cardinal direction.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

receiving, from the robot, a set of data samples from a magnetometer of the robot; and

determining, based on the set of data samples, an offset for the robot.

15 . A computer-implemented method for controlling a robot, comprising:

determining an offset relating to a robot in relation to a first reference point;

determining, at a user device, a second reference point based on a magnetometer of the user device;

generating, based on user input, a movement instruction for the robot comprising a heading based on the second reference point and the received offset; and

providing the generated movement instruction to the robot.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the second reference point is determined based on a rotation angle from an inertial measurement unit.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein determining the offset relating to the robot comprises receiving the offset in a response from the robot, and wherein the response is in response to a calibration indication provided to the robot.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein determining the offset relating to the robot comprises:

receiving, from the robot, a set of data samples from a magnetometer of the robot; and

determining, based on the set of data samples, the offset for the robot.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 18 , wherein determining the offset relating to the robot further comprises at least one of:

removing noise from the set of data samples; and

performing a smoothing operation on the set of data samples.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the first reference point and the second reference point correspond to a similar cardinal direction.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 11, 2020
From: SPHERO, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 052623/0705 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2018
From: HYGH, DAVID; CARROLL, JONATHAN; MARTIN, PATRICK; MICHELET, QUENTIN
To: SPHERO, INC.
Reel/Frame 044927/0947 →