IP Library Granted Patent US 11,036,233
Granted Patent B2
US 11,036,233 · App. 15/963,662 · Granted Jun 15, 2021

Adaptive vehicle motion control system

Inventors: Albert Costa (Pittsburgh, PA); Michael L. Phillips (Pittsburgh, PA); Michael Bode (Pittsburgh, PA)
Assignee: UATC, LLC
G05D1/0223B60W30/0953G01C21/3415G05D1/0027G05D1/0088G05D1/0217G05D2201/0213
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,036,233
App. No.
15/963,662
Granted
Jun 15, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for controlling the motion of an autonomous are provided. In one example embodiment, a computer implemented method includes obtaining, by one or more computing devices on-board an autonomous vehicle, data associated with one or more objects that are proximate to the autonomous vehicle. The data includes a predicted path of each respective object. The method includes identifying at least one object as an object of interest based at least in part on the data associated with the object of interest. The method includes generating cost data associated with the object of interest. The method includes determining a motion plan for the autonomous vehicle based at least in part on the cost data associated with the object of interest. The method includes providing data indicative of the motion plan to one or more vehicle control systems to implement the motion plan for the autonomous vehicle.

Claims (16)

1. A computer-implemented method of controlling autonomous vehicle motion, comprising:

obtaining, by a computing system comprising one or more computing devices, data associated with an object that is proximate to an autonomous vehicle, wherein the data comprises a predicted path of the object;

performing, by the computing system, a cost analysis of controlling a motion of the autonomous vehicle to maintain travel behind the object at a following distance or in front of the object at a leading distance in a manner that corresponds to a motion of the object;

determining, by the computing system, a motion plan for the autonomous vehicle based at least in part on the cost analysis; and

causing, by the computing system, the autonomous vehicle to implement at least a portion of the motion plan for the autonomous vehicle.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the object comprises a lead vehicle and wherein traveling in the manner that corresponds to the object comprises following the lead vehicle.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the object is located behind the autonomous vehicle and wherein traveling in the manner that corresponds to the object comprises travelling in front of the object.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying, by the computing system, the object as a collision risk with respect to the autonomous vehicle.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein performing the cost analysis comprises:

generating, by the computing system, cost data associated with the object, wherein the cost data is indicative of a cost of controlling the motion of the autonomous vehicle to maintain travel behind the object at the following distance or in front of the object at the leading distance in a manner that corresponds to the motion of the object.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the cost data is based at least in part on one or more constraints, and wherein the one or more constraints comprise at least one of a headway between the autonomous vehicle and the object, a time to a potential collision between the autonomous vehicle and the object, and a minimum preferred distance between the autonomous vehicle and the object.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein performing the cost analysis comprises:

generating, by the computing system, a cost function that is indicative of a cost of controlling the motion of the autonomous vehicle in the manner that corresponds to the motion of the object.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein one or more inputs of the cost function comprise at least a subset of the data associated with the object and a travel route of the autonomous vehicle.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the motion plan comprises a trajectory by which the autonomous vehicle is to travel behind the object or a trajectory by which the autonomous vehicle is to travel in front of the object.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 14, 2024
From: UATC, LLC
To: AURORA OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 067733/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2023
From: COSTA, ALBERT
To: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 063830/0255 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE FROM CHANGE OF NAME TO ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 050353 FRAME 0884. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECT CONVEYANCE SHOULD BE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 27, 2019
From: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: UATC, LLC
Reel/Frame 051145/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 12, 2019
From: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: UATC, LLC
Reel/Frame 050353/0884 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2019
From: PHILLIPS, MICHAEL L.; BODE, MICHAEL; COSTA, ALBERT
To: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 048105/0702 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15423233 · Feb 2, 2017
Related Publication 20180246517A1 · Aug 30, 2018
Cited By (3)
US 12,552,414 US 12,578,723 US 12,693,666