Identifying potential solutions for abnormal events based on historical data

1. A computer-implemented method performed by one or more processors, comprising:

obtaining, by the one or more processors, interaction data between a client device and a server;

determining, by the one or more processors, whether an abnormal event exists in the obtained interaction data;

in response to determining that the abnormal event exists in the obtained interaction data, obtaining, by the one or more processors, attribute information of a user corresponding to the client device from the obtained interaction data;

identifying, by the one or more processors, one or more records in a database, each record including the attribute information, a cause of one or more previous abnormal events, and a weight characterizing a severity of the previous abnormal events;

determining, by the one or more processors, a cause of the abnormal event, wherein the determined cause is the same as the cause of the previous abnormal events from the record in the identified one or more records that includes a largest weight; and

providing, by the one or more processors, a solution to address the abnormal event based on the determined cause.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the one or more processors, an occurrence of a plurality of abnormal events in the obtained interaction data;

sorting, by the one or more processors, the plurality of abnormal events in a predetermined abnormal event order; and

executing, by the one or more processors, in a sequential order of the sorted plurality of abnormal events, the sorted plurality of abnormal events based on causes for each abnormal event in the sorted plurality of abnormal events.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the weight characterizing the severity of the abnormal event includes a quantity of times the abnormal event occurred.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: executing, by the one or more processors, the solution to address abnormal event to produce a processing result.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising: receiving, by the one or more processors, feedback data from a user of the client device based on the processing result obtained from the server after processing the abnormal event.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the feedback data comprises an indication of an agreement on the executed solution or an indication of a disagreement on the executed solution, as indicated by the user at the client device.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the one or more records in the database further comprises:

comparing, by the one or more processors, attribute information from each of the one or more records in the database to the attribute information from the obtained interaction data; and

in response to comparing the attribute information from each of the one or more records in the database to the attribute information found in the obtained interaction data, determining, by the one or more processors, a match between the attribute information from at least one of the one or more records to the attribute information from the obtained interaction data.

8. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions executable by a computer system to perform operations comprising:

obtaining, by one or more processors, interaction data between a client device and a server;

determining, by the one or more processors, whether an abnormal event exists in the obtained interaction data;

in response to determining that the abnormal event exists in the obtained interaction data, obtaining, by the one or more processors, attribute information of a user corresponding to the client device from the obtained interaction data;

identifying, by the one or more processors, one or more records in a database, each record including the attribute information, a cause of one or more previous abnormal events, and a weight characterizing a severity of the previous abnormal events;

determining, by the one or more processors, a cause of the abnormal event, wherein the determined cause is the same as the cause of the previous abnormal events from the record in the identified one or more records that includes a largest weight; and

providing, by the one or more processors, a solution to address the abnormal event based on the determined cause.

9. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

determining, by the one or more processors, an occurrence of a plurality of abnormal events in the obtained interaction data;

sorting, by the one or more processors, the plurality of abnormal events in a predetermined abnormal event order; and

executing, by the one or more processors, in a sequential order of the sorted plurality of abnormal events, the sorted plurality of abnormal events based on causes for each abnormal event in the sorted plurality of abnormal events.

10. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the weight characterizing the severity of the abnormal event includes a quantity of times the abnormal event occurred.

11. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , the operations further comprising: executing, by the one or more processors, the solution to address abnormal event to produce a processing result.

12. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 11 , the operations further comprising: receiving, by the one or more processors, feedback data from a user of the client device based on the processing result obtained from the server after processing the abnormal event.

13. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the feedback data comprises an indication of an agreement on the executed solution or an indication of a disagreement on the executed solution, as indicated by the user at the client device.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein identifying the one or more records in the database further comprises:

comparing, by the one or more processors, attribute information from each of the one or more records in the database to the attribute information from the obtained interaction data; and

in response to comparing the attribute information from each of the one or more records in the database to the attribute information found in the obtained interaction data, determining, by the one or more processors, a match between the attribute information from at least one of the one or more records to the attribute information from the obtained interaction data.

15. A computer-implemented system, comprising:

one or more computers; and

one or more computer memory devices interoperably coupled with the one or more computers and having tangible, non-transitory, machine-readable media storing one or more instructions that, when executed by the one or more computers, perform one or more operations comprising:

obtaining, by one or more processors, interaction data between a client device and a server;

determining, by the one or more processors, whether an abnormal event exists in the obtained interaction data;

in response to determining that the abnormal event exists in the obtained interaction data, obtaining, by the one or more processors, attribute information of a user corresponding to the client device from the obtained interaction data;

identifying, by the one or more processors, one or more records in a database, each record including the attribute information, a cause of one or more previous abnormal events, and a weight characterizing a severity of the previous abnormal events;

determining, by the one or more processors, a cause of the abnormal event, wherein the determined cause is the same as the cause of the previous abnormal events from the record in the identified one or more records that includes a largest weight; and

providing, by the one or more processors, a solution to address the abnormal event based on the determined cause.

16. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:

determining, by the one or more processors, an occurrence of a plurality of abnormal events in the obtained interaction data;

sorting, by the one or more processors, the plurality of abnormal events in a predetermined abnormal event order; and

executing, by the one or more processors, in a sequential order of the sorted plurality of abnormal events, the sorted plurality of abnormal events based on causes for each abnormal event in the sorted plurality of abnormal events.

17. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein the weight characterizing the severity of the abnormal event includes a quantity of times the abnormal event occurred.

18. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , the operations further comprising: executing, by the one or more processors, the solution to address abnormal event to produce a processing result.

19. The computer-implemented system of claim 18 , the operations further comprising: receiving, by the one or more processors, feedback data from a user of the client device based on the processing result obtained from the server after processing the abnormal event.

20. The computer-implemented system of claim 19 , wherein the feedback data comprises an indication of an agreement on the executed solution or an indication of a disagreement on the executed solution, as indicated by the user at the client device.