IP Library Granted Patent US 10,471,659
Granted Patent B2
US 10,471,659 · App. 15/996,726 · Granted Nov 12, 2019

Systems and methods of simulating intermediate forms for additive fabrication

Inventor: Shane Wighton (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: Formlabs, Inc.
B29C64/386B33Y50/00G05B2219/49007
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,471,659
App. No.
15/996,726
Granted
Nov 12, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

According to some embodiments, a method of optimizing an additive fabrication process for an object is provided, the method comprising obtaining a representation of an intermediate form of the object, the intermediate form being an expected shape of the object when partially fabricated by the additive fabrication process, simulating one or more forces expected to be applied to the intermediate form of the object during the additive fabrication process, evaluating one or more results of the simulating step against one or more criteria, and adapting the additive fabrication process based at least in part on a result of the evaluating.

Claims (28)

1. A method of optimizing an additive fabrication process for an object to be fabricated by an additive fabrication device from N layers of material, the method comprising:

identifying a first intermediate form of the object, the first intermediate form of the object being an expected shape after M of the N layers of the object have been formed, wherein M is less than N;

simulating, using at least one processor, one or more forces expected to be applied to the first intermediate form of the object during fabrication of the object by the additive fabrication device;

generating, using the at least one processor, a support structure for the object, wherein when one or more results of the simulating step exceed any of one or more thresholds, the generated support structure comprises at least one support coupled to one or more of the M layers of the object; and

generating, using the at least one processor, instructions that, when executed by the additive fabrication device, cause the additive fabrication device to fabricate the object and the support structure.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising fabricating the object via the additive fabrication process according to the generated instructions.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein simulating the one or more forces expected to be applied to the first intermediate form of the object during fabrication of the object by the additive fabrication device comprises performing a finite element analysis of the first intermediate form of the object.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more thresholds include a maximum allowable deformation of a region of the first intermediate form.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the region of the first intermediate form includes at least part of the Mth layer of the object.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more thresholds include a maximum allowable displacement of a region of the first intermediate form.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the at least one processor, dimensions of the at least one support coupled to the one or more of the M layers of the object based on an extent to which the one or more results of the simulating step exceed any of the one or more thresholds.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the additive fabrication process comprises forming each of the N layers of the object in contact with a container, and wherein the one or more results of the simulating step include a peak force expected to be applied to the Mth layer during separation of the Mth layer from the container.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more results of the simulating step comprise at least one force predicted to be applied to a region of the intermediate form of the object.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the additive fabrication process includes stereolithography.

11. At least one non-transitory computer readable medium comprising an executable program that, when executed, causes a computer to perform a method of optimizing an additive fabrication process for an object to be fabricated by an additive fabrication device from N layers of material, the method comprising:

identifying a first intermediate form of the object, the first intermediate form of the object being an expected shape after M of the N layers of the object have been formed, wherein M is less than N;

simulating, using at least one processor, one or more forces expected to be applied to the first intermediate form of the object during fabrication of the object by the additive fabrication device;

generating, using the at least one processor, a support structure for the object, wherein when one or more results of the simulating step exceed any of one or more thresholds, the generated support structure comprises at least one support coupled to one or more of the M layers of the object; and

generating, using the at least one processor, instructions that, when executed by the additive fabrication device, cause the additive fabrication device to fabricate the object and the support structure.

12. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the method further comprises fabricating the object via the additive fabrication process according to the generated instructions.

13. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein simulating the one or more forces expected to be applied to the first intermediate form of the object during fabrication of the object by the additive fabrication device comprises performing a finite element analysis of the first intermediate form of the object.

14. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more thresholds include a maximum allowable deformation of a region of the first intermediate form.

15. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the region of the first intermediate form includes at least part of the Mth layer of the object.

16. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more thresholds include a maximum allowable displacement of a region of the first intermediate form.

17. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the method further comprises determining, by the at least one processor, dimensions of the at least one support coupled to the one or more of the M layers of the object based on an extent to which the one or more results of the simulating step exceed any of the one or more thresholds.

18. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the additive fabrication process comprises forming each of the N layers of the object in contact with a container, and wherein the one or more results of the simulating step include a peak force expected to be applied to the Mth layer during separation of the Mth layer from the container.

19. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more results of the simulating step comprise at least one force predicted to be applied to a region of the intermediate form of the object.

20. The at least one non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the additive fabrication process includes stereolithography.

Assignments (3)
AMENDED AND RESTATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: FORMLABS INC.; FORMLABS OHIO INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 061087/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2020
From: FORMLABS INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 051734/0886 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2018
From: WIGHTON, SHANE
To: FORMLABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 046511/0649 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14543138 · Nov 17, 2014
Related Publication 20190070782A1 · Mar 7, 2019