IP Library Granted Patent US 10,576,689
Granted Patent B2
US 10,576,689 · App. 16/009,722 · Granted Mar 3, 2020

Additive fabrication support structures

Inventors: Shane Wighton (Cambridge, MA); Maxim Lobovsky (Cambridge, MA); Peter Schmidt-Nielsen (Lexington, MA)
Assignee: Formlabs, Inc.
B29C64/40B29C33/3842B29C64/106B29C64/112B29C64/118B29C64/124B29C64/129B29C64/135B29C64/141B29C64/147B29C64/153B29C64/165B29C64/386B29C64/393B33Y50/00B33Y10/00B33Y50/02G06F2217/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,576,689
App. No.
16/009,722
Granted
Mar 3, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Techniques for generating a support structure for an object are provided. In some embodiments, one or more regions of the object are identified as one or more regions to which mechanical support is to be provided and one or more support points within at least a first region of the one or more regions are identified. A support structure may be generated for the object that comprises one or more support tips coupled to the object at the one or more support points, where the support tips being generated based at least in part on a direction normal to the surface of the object at the respective support point. Techniques for providing visual feedback to a user relating to an amount of support that a support structure is expected to provide during fabrication are also provided.

Claims (15)

1. A computer-implemented method of evaluating support provided to an object to be fabricated via an additive fabrication device, the method comprising:

calculating, using one or more processors, based on a three-dimensional representation of the object and an associated support structure, a supportedness value for a first region of the object, wherein:

calculating the supportedness value is based at least in part on one or more forces to which the object and/or support structure are expected to be subjected to during said fabrication of the object by the additive fabrication device, and

the supportedness value is indicative of a degree of support that the support structure is expected to provide to the first region of the object during fabrication of the object by the additive fabrication device; and

displaying the object via a graphical user interface, wherein the calculated supportedness value for the first region of the object is indicated within the graphical user interface by coloring at least a portion of the first region of the object and/or the support structure using one or more colors.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the supportedness value for the first region of the object is indicated by coloring at least a portion of the first region of the object using the one or more colors.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the supportedness value for the first region is indicated by coloring at least a part of the support structure using the one or more colors.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more colors includes a first color when the supportedness value is above a first threshold, and includes a second color, different from the first color, when the supportedness value is below a second threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the supportedness value is calculated, at least in part, by calculating supportedness values for a plurality of voxels of the three-dimensional representation of the object.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein a supportedness value for at least one voxel of the plurality of voxels is calculated based at least in part on one or more supportedness values of one or more neighboring voxels.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the supportedness value is calculated, at least in part, using a finite element analysis.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, when user input indicates that the supportedness value is not acceptable, updating the indication of the supportedness value for the first region of the object based on a new supportedness value.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising, subsequent to said user input, generating a second support structure for the object.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising obtaining the three-dimensional representation of the object by reading data from one or more computer readable storage media.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more forces to which the object and/or support structure are expected to be subjected to during said fabrication include gravity.

Assignments (3)
AMENDED AND RESTATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: FORMLABS INC.; FORMLABS OHIO INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 061087/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 29, 2020
From: FORMLABS INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 051734/0886 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 3, 2019
From: WIGHTON, SHANE; LOBOVSKY, MAXIM; SCHMIDT-NIELSEN, PETER
To: FORMLABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 047891/0895 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 14873310 · Oct 2, 2015
Continuation 14275459 · May 12, 2014
Continuation 14245765 · Apr 4, 2014
Provisional Application 61878851 · Sep 17, 2013
Provisional Application 61808714 · Apr 5, 2013
Related Publication 20180297291A1 · Oct 18, 2018
Cited By (1)
US 12,186,993