IP Library Granted Patent US 10,306,220
Granted Patent B2
US 10,306,220 · App. 16/040,735 · Granted May 28, 2019

Methods for determining localized outages and distributed signal verification of set-top boxes

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,306,220
App. No.
16/040,735
Granted
May 28, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments disclose systems and methods for testing and determining outages of communication systems. A server can receive signal-reception-related information from set-top boxes (STBs) in a particular geographical region, where a STB: receives signals having a predefined pattern, generates a comparison of the predefined pattern to reference patterns stored on the STB, generates the signal-reception-related information based on the comparison, and sends the signal-reception-related information. The server can determine an outage status for the particular geographical region based on the signal-reception-related information. The server can generate an output based on the outage status. The output is configured to provide information related to the outage status of the particular geographical region and information for possible responses related to the outage status. The server can send the output.

Claims (45)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, by a processing system having a processor, signal-reception-related information provided by a plurality of computing devices, wherein a first computing device of the plurality of computing devices is located in a first geographical region, and wherein a second computing device of the plurality of computing devices is located in a second geographical region;

determining, by the processing system, a first testing rate for receiving the signal-reception-related information from the first geographical region, wherein the first testing rate is determined based on a first outage status for the first geographical region;

determining, by the processing system, a second testing rate for receiving the signal-reception-related information from the second geographical region, wherein the second testing rate is determined based on a second outage status for the second geographical region; and

causing the first computing device to provide the signal-reception-related information at the first testing rate and the second computing device to provide the signal-reception-related information at the second testing rate, wherein the first testing rate is different than the second testing rate, thereby controlling network loads associated with the receiving the signal-reception-related information according to the first outage status for the first geographical region and the second outage status for the second geographical region.

2. The method of claim 1 , further including comparing the first outage status and the second outage status, wherein the comparing indicates that the first geographical region is experiencing more outages than the second geographical region.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the first testing rate is higher than the second testing rate.

4. The method of claim 1 , further including:

determining, by the processing system, that the first computing device of the plurality of computing devices is located in the first geographical region; and

determining, by the processing system, that the second computing device of the plurality of computing devices is located in the second geographical region, according to the signal-reception-related information.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining one or more possible causes for an outage, wherein the one or more possible causes for the outage are selected from a group of: a meteorologically-related cause, a satellite-related cause, a terrestrial-network-related cause, a network-traffic-related cause, and a solar-radiation-related cause.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving the signal-reception-related information comprises:

sending a first request for the signal-reception-related information to the first computing device of the plurality of computing devices at the first testing rate; and

sending a second request for the signal-reception-related information to the second computing device of the plurality of computing devices at the second testing rate.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving the signal-reception-related information comprises:

sending the first testing rate to the first computing device of the plurality of computing devices; and

sending the second testing rate to the second computing device of the plurality of computing devices.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing, by the processing system, possible responses related to the first outage status for the first geographical region.

9. A server comprising:

a processor; and

a memory that stores computer-readable program instructions that, upon execution by the processor, cause the server to facilitate performance of operations, the operations comprising:

receiving first signal-reception-related information from a first plurality of computing devices located in a first geographical region;

receiving second signal-reception-related information from a second plurality of computing devices located in a second geographical region;

determining a first testing rate for receiving the first signal-reception-related information from the first geographical region, wherein the first testing rate is determined based on a first outage status for the first geographical region;

determining a second testing rate for receiving the second signal-reception-related information from the second geographical region, wherein the second testing rate is determined based on a second outage status for the second geographical region; and

causing a first computing device of the first plurality of computing devices to send the first signal-reception-related information to the server at the first testing rate and a second computing device of the second plurality of computing devices to send the second signal-reception-related information to the server at the second testing rate, wherein the first testing rate is different than the second testing rate.

10. The server of claim 9 , the operations further including:

comparing the first outage status and the second outage status; and

responsive to the comparing indicating that the first geographical region is experiencing more outages than the second geographical region, the determining the first testing rate and the determining the second testing rate results in the first testing rate being higher than the second testing rate.

11. The server of claim 9 , the operations further including determining that the first plurality of computing devices are located in the first geographical region according to the first signal-reception-related information and that the second plurality of computing devices are located in the second geographical region according to the second signal-reception-related information.

12. The server of claim 9 , the operations further including determining one or more possible causes for an outage, wherein the one or more possible causes for the outage are selected from a group of: a meteorologically-related cause, a satellite-related cause, a terrestrial-network-related cause, a network-traffic-related cause, and a solar-radiation-related cause.

13. The server of claim 9 , wherein the receiving the first signal-reception-related information comprises sending a first request for the first signal-reception-related information to each of the first plurality of computing devices at the first testing rate, and wherein the receiving the second signal-reception-related information comprises sending a second request for the second signal-reception-related information to each of the second plurality of computing devices at the second testing rate.

14. The server of claim 9 , wherein the receiving the first signal-reception-related information comprises sending the first testing rate to each of the first plurality of computing devices, and wherein the receiving the second signal-reception-related information comprises sending the second testing rate to each of the plurality of computing devices.

15. The server of claim 9 , the operations further including providing possible responses related to the first outage status for the first geographical region.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer-readable program instructions that, upon execution by a processing system including a processor, cause the processing system to facilitate performance of operations, the operations comprising:

receiving signal-reception-related information from a plurality of computing devices, wherein a first computing device is located in a first geographical region, and wherein a second computing device is located in a second geographical region;

determining a first testing rate for receiving the signal-reception-related information from the first geographical region, wherein the first testing rate is determined based on a first outage status for the first geographical region;

determining a second testing rate for receiving the signal-reception-related information from the second geographical region, wherein the second testing rate is determined based on a second outage status for the second geographical region; and

wherein the first testing rate is different than the second testing rate, thereby controlling network loads associated with the receiving the signal-reception-related information according to the first outage status for the first geographical region and the second outage status for the second geographical region.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , the operations further including:

comparing the first outage status and the second outage status; and

responsive to the comparing indicating that the first geographical region is experiencing more outages than the second geographical region, the determining the first testing rate and the determining the second testing rate results in the first testing rate being higher than the second testing rate.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , the operations further including determining that the first computing device is located in the first geographical region and that the second computing device is located in the second geographical region, according to the signal-reception-related information.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the receiving the signal-reception-related information comprises sending a first request for the signal-reception-related information to the first computing device at the first testing rate, and sending a second request for the signal-reception-related information to the second computing device at the second testing rate.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the receiving the signal-reception-related information comprises sending the first testing rate to the first computing device, and sending the second testing rate to the second computing device.

Assignments (6)
SUCCESSION OF AGENCY IN PATENT SECURITY INTERESTS Recorded Oct 3, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH (AS SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH)
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
Reel/Frame 072994/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 25, 2024
From: DIRECTV, LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066371/0690 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2021
From: DIRECTV, LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 058220/0531 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: DIRECTV, LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057695/0084 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2021
From: THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.
To: DIRECTV, LLC
Reel/Frame 057021/0221 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 23, 2018
From: CHIN, KIAN-VINE; YEE, WOEI-SHYANG; HUIE, WESLEY W.; TALATINIAN, GERARD V.; YANG, CHRISTOPHER; KIM, HEESOON E.; GREENWADE, ROBERT S.
To: THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 046425/0150 →