IP Library Granted Patent US 10,395,522
Granted Patent B2
US 10,395,522 · App. 16/059,886 · Granted Aug 27, 2019

Adaptive traffic optimization using unmanned aerial vehicles

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,395,522
App. No.
16/059,886
Granted
Aug 27, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods of adaptive traffic control based on detected anomalies in traffic conditions and utilizing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to determine root causes thereof are disclosed. One aspect of the present disclosure is a method including receiving traffic data at an intersection; determining statistics associated with traffic at the intersection based on the traffic data; detecting an anomaly in the traffic based on the statistics; utilizing an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to determine a root cause of the anomaly; and communicating an anomaly rule based on the root cause to a light controller to control traffic at the intersection.

Claims (72)

1. A method of adaptive traffic control, the method comprising:

receiving traffic data at an intersection;

determining statistics associated with traffic at the intersection based on the traffic data;

detecting an anomaly in the traffic based on the statistics;

utilizing an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to determine a root cause of the anomaly; and

communicating an anomaly rule based on the root cause to a light controller to control traffic at the intersection.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the statistics comprises:

recording, for each of a plurality of time intervals and for each zone at the intersection, at least one of:

an average traffic flow rate for a corresponding zone; and

whether at least one object is detected in the corresponding zone.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the UAV is utilized if the average traffic flow rate is less than a threshold and no object is detected in the corresponding zone.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the anomaly is detected when the average traffic flow rate in a corresponding zone at the intersection is equal to or less than a threshold and no object is detected in the corresponding zone for at least two consecutive ones of the plurality of time intervals.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein utilizing the UAV comprises:

retrieving settings for the UAV;

launching the UAV to monitor one or more target zones to determine the root cause; and

determining if, in one or more of the target zones, a corresponding traffic flow rate is less than a threshold and at least one object is detected therein.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

processing image data of the one or more target zones for which the corresponding traffic flow rate is less than the threshold;

sending the image data to a graphical user interface; and

determining the root cause of the anomaly based on at least one of a result of processing the image data or an input received from the graphical user interface in response to sending of the image data.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the anomaly rule by:

retrieving an existing anomaly rule from an anomaly rules database; or

generating a new anomaly rule, wherein

the existing anomaly rule or the new anomaly rule has one or more traffic control settings to be applied to a traffic light at the intersection to at least one of prevent future occurrences of the anomaly or reduce a current impact of the anomaly on existing traffic at the intersection.

8. A traffic controller, comprising:

memory having computer-readable instructions stored therein; and

one or more processors configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to:

receive traffic data at an intersection;

determine statistics associated with traffic at the intersection based on the traffic data;

detect an anomaly in the traffic based on the statistics;

utilize an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to determine a root cause of the anomaly; and

communicate an anomaly rule based on the root cause to a light controller to control traffic at the intersection.

9. The traffic controller of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to determine the statistics by recording, for each of a plurality of time intervals and for each zone at the intersection, at least one of:

an average traffic flow rate for a corresponding zone; and

whether at least one object is detected in the corresponding zone.

10. The traffic controller of claim 9 , wherein the UAV is utilized if the average traffic flow rate is less than a threshold and no object is detected in the corresponding zone.

11. The traffic controller of claim 9 , wherein the anomaly is detected when the average traffic flow rate in a corresponding zone at the intersection is equal to or less than a threshold and no object is detected in the corresponding zone for at least two consecutive ones of the plurality of time intervals.

12. The traffic controller of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to utilize the UAV by:

retrieving settings for the UAV;

launching the UAV to monitor one or more target zones to determine the root cause; and

determining if, in one or more of the target zones, a corresponding traffic flow rate is less than a threshold and at least one object is detected therein.

13. The traffic controller of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to:

process image data of the one or more target zones for which the corresponding traffic flow rate is less than the threshold;

send the image data to a graphical user interface; and

determine the root cause of the anomaly based on at least one of a result of processing the image data or an input received from the graphical user interface in response to sending of the image data.

14. The traffic controller of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to determine the anomaly rule by:

retrieving an existing anomaly rule from an anomaly rules database; or

generating a new anomaly rule, wherein

the existing anomaly rule or the new anomaly rule has one or more traffic control settings to be applied to a traffic light at the intersection to at least one of prevent future occurrences of the anomaly or reduce a current impact of the anomaly on existing traffic at the intersection.

15. The traffic controller of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to determine the anomaly rule by:

retrieving an existing anomaly rule from an anomaly rules database; or

generating a new anomaly rule, wherein

the existing anomaly rule or the new anomaly rule has one or more traffic control settings to be applied to a traffic light at the intersection to at least one of prevent future occurrences of the anomaly or reduce a current impact of the anomaly on existing traffic at the intersection.

16. One or more non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable instructions, which when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

receive traffic data at an intersection;

determine statistics associated with traffic at the intersection based on the traffic data;

detect an anomaly in the traffic based on the statistics;

utilize an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to determine a root cause of the anomaly; and

communicate an anomaly rule based on the root cause to a light controller to control traffic at the intersection.

17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the execution of the computer-readable instructions by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to determine the statistics by recording, for each of a plurality of time intervals and for each zone at the intersection, at least one of:

an average traffic flow rate for a corresponding zone; and

whether at least one object is detected in the corresponding zone.

18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the UAV is utilized if the average traffic flow rate is less than a threshold and no object is detected in the corresponding zone.

19. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the execution of the computer-readable instructions by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to utilize the UAV by:

retrieving settings for the UAV;

launching the UAV to monitor one or more target zones to determine the root cause; and

determining if, in one or more of the target zones, a corresponding traffic flow rate is less than a threshold and at least one object is detected therein.

20. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 19 , wherein the execution of the computer-readable instructions by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to:

process image data of the one or more target zones for which the corresponding traffic flow rate is less than the threshold;

send the image data to a graphical user interface; and

determine the root cause of the anomaly based on at least one of a result of processing the image data or an input received from the graphical user interface in response to sending of the image data.

Assignments (10)
SUPERPRIORITY PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 6, 2025
From: CUBIC CORPORATION; CUBIC DEFENSE APPLICATIONS INC.; CUBIC DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC.; CUBIC ITS, INC.; CUBIC SECURE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; CUBIC TOTAL LEARNING PLATFORM, LLC; CUBIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.; GATR TECHNOLOGIES INC.; NUVOTRONICS INC.
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Reel/Frame 073008/0761 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2025
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: CUBIC CORPORATION; CUBIC DEFENSE APPLICATIONS, INC.; CUBIC DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 072278/0272 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2025
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: CUBIC CORPORATION; CUBIC DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC; NUVOTRONICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 072281/0176 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 056393/0281 Recorded Jul 28, 2025
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: CUBIC CORPORATION; CUBIC DEFENSE APPLICATIONS, INC.; CUBIC DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC (FORMERLY PIXIA CORP.)
Reel/Frame 072282/0124 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2025
From: CUBIC CORPORATION
To: CUBIC ITS, INC.
Reel/Frame 071370/0881 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 2, 2025
From: CUBIC DEFENSE APPLICATIONS, INC.; CUBIC DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE, INC.
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
Reel/Frame 071161/0299 →
SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 26, 2021
From: CUBIC CORPORATION; PIXIA CORP.; NUVOTRONICS, INC.
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
Reel/Frame 056393/0314 →
FIRST LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 26, 2021
From: CUBIC CORPORATION; PIXIA CORP.; NUVOTRONICS, INC.
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Reel/Frame 056393/0281 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2019
From: GRIDSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: CUBIC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 048248/0847 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 29, 2018
From: MALKES, WILLIAM A.; OVERSTREET, WILLIAM S.; PRICE, JEFFERY R.; TOURVILLE, MICHAEL J.
To: GRIDSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 046745/0601 →