IP Library Granted Patent US 11,078,650
Granted Patent B2
US 11,078,650 · App. 16/061,276 · Granted Aug 3, 2021

Management of liquid conduit systems

Inventors: Ivan Stoianov (Greater London, GB); Edo Abraham (Greater London, GB); Filippo Pecci (Greater London, GB)
Assignee: IP2IPO INNOVATIONS LIMITED
E03B7/071E03B7/02E03B7/075G05D16/2026G05D16/204G05D16/2066Y02A20/15
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,078,650
App. No.
16/061,276
Granted
Aug 3, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling conditions within a liquid conduit system. The method comprising: defining a zone within the liquid conduit system, wherein pressure within the zone is influenced by one or more actuator valves; controlling the one or more actuator valves in dependence on a Pareto efficient solution to the minimisation of functions of the average pressure within the zone (AZP) and the pressure variability within the zone (PVZ).

Claims (26)

1. A method for controlling pressure conditions within a liquid conduit system comprising

defining a zone within the liquid conduit system, wherein pressure within the zone is influenced by one or more actuator valves;

defining a first function to be minimised, the first function expressing the average pressure within the zone (AZP);

defining a second function to be minimised, the second function expressing the pressure variability within the zone (PVZ);

minimising the first and second functions;

determining a Pareto efficient solution to a problem of optimal minimisation of both the first and second functions; and

controlling the one or more actuator valves in dependence on the Pareto efficient solution.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein one or more locations of the one or more actuator valves are selected in dependence on the Pareto efficient solution.

3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the zone comprises a plurality of conduits, and each conduit is represented by a weighting factor for constraining the second function.

4. A method according to claim 3 , wherein the weighting factor is generated in dependence on a criticality risk-based parameter of the conduit.

5. A method according to claim 3 , wherein the weighting factor is generated in dependence on a vulnerability risk-based parameter of the conduit.

6. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the Pareto efficient solution is obtained using a series of single-objective mixed integer non-linear programs.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the Pareto efficient solution is obtained using a scalarization method.

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the first function is formulated as a weighted sum of nodal pressures within the zone, where a respective weighting factor for each nodal pressure is representative of lengths of conduit connected to corresponding nodes.

9. A computer program product comprising computer executable instructions embodied in a non-transitory computer readable medium for carrying out the method of claim 1 .

10. An apparatus for controlling a liquid conduit system comprising a zone containing one or more actuator valves, the apparatus comprising one or more processors configured to

minimise a first function and a second function, wherein the first function expresses an average pressure within the zone (AZP) and the second function expresses a pressure variability within the zone (PVZ);

calculate a Pareto efficient solution to a problem of optimal minimisation of both the first and second functions; and

control the one or more actuator valves in dependence on the Pareto efficient solution.

11. An apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein one or more of the locations of the one or more actuator valves are selected in dependence on the Pareto efficient solution.

12. An apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the zone comprises a plurality of conduits, a corresponding weighting factor is ascribed to each conduit, and each weighting factor is applied within the second function.

13. An apparatus according to claim 12 , wherein the weighting factor is generated in dependence on a criticality risk-based parameter of the conduit.

14. An apparatus according to claim 12 , wherein the weighting is generated in dependence on a vulnerability risk-based parameter of the conduit.

15. An apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the Pareto efficient solution is obtained using a series of single-objective mixed integer non-linear programs.

16. An apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the Pareto efficient solution is obtained using a scalarization method.

17. An apparatus according to claim 10 , wherein the first function is formulated as a weighted sum of nodal pressures within the zone, where a respective weighting factor for each nodal pressure is representative of lengths of conduit connected to corresponding nodes.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 17, 2019
From: IMPERIAL INNOVATIONS LIMITED
To: IP2IPO INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 050403/0888 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 11, 2018
From: STOIANOV, IVAN; ABRAHAM, EDO; PECCI, FILIPPO
To: IMPERIAL INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 046047/0532 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 1522553 · Dec 21, 2015 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180355589A1 · Dec 13, 2018
Cited By (1)
US 12,585,294